see4
Well-Known Member
The judge that dismissed the case said " the DNC used resources and surreptitious methods to support Clinton over Sanders".
The DNC did not even attempt to defend the allegation that they showed favoritism towards Clinton. They argued that the DNC can run primaries however they chose, and there is nothing legally binding that forces them to remain neutral.
In other words, the case (which sought monetary damages for donations made to Sanders and the DNC by the plaintiffs) was dismissed on a legal basis, not because the claim that the DNC showed favoritism was without merit.
http://sunshinestatenews.com/story/...-rigged-primary-judge-dismisses-fraud-lawsuit
https://www.google.com/amp/observer...-schulz-rigged-primaries-against-sanders/amp/
And yet you are overlooking the obvious. Bernie is an Independent, not a Democrat. He has said so himself. And Padawan's excuse that, "waah, the election process isn't fair, waah", is dry and baseless.
I repeat, Bernie is not a Democrat, why should he be held to the DNC standards?
You reviewed his voting record and listened to his speeches, and yet you were clearly oblivious to the fact that one of the main points of his platform was to overturn Citizens United and enact campaign finance reform?
So, you're saying that you lack the ability to comprehend things?
If you reread what I wrote, you will hopefully grasp the idea that I read his voting record and listened to his speeches when he first "came to the scene". The speech you provided and the subsequent statement issued on Berniebaby's website are after the fact. Meaning, I already made up my mind on Bernie prior to those issued statements.
Try harder bro.