The world of cannabis is not defined by the seed banks.. come 10 years time and attitude just sells crappy strains, well someone like TGA will think hmmm, maybe i could make some money selling real strains etc. Again, the seed suply will only run out if people wish for this to happen, which on the whole they don't, if someone had only a handful of seeds left from a 20yr old killer strain, common sense would dictate that they would clone out and polinate and such.
I'm not talking about 10 years from now.
If you think the population of landrace genetics hasn't dwindled your sadly mistaken and talking about a handful of seeds when trying to preserve a genetic line is laughable. While landrace species still exist they are not around in the numbers that they used to be, to me that is negligence.
And your perception that all we see is negligence, well keep it to yourself, i don't think a clone only strain has sucessfully kept itself alive and spreading through negligence. Not everyone is the same..
I was talking about man kind as a whole being negligent.
Keeping a clone going for 20 years doesn't mean anything. To keep diversity in genes massive populations must be grown out which is almost impossible with the laws today and one clone with one particular set of genes of a particular genetic isn't going to cut it. Also, have you ever heard of genetic drift? Clones will only last so long before the genetic will start to deteriorate and again I'm thinking long term effects not 20 years.
if however a stable female is sprayed with collodial silver and then artificially hermis, and that pollen impregnates a different stable female, what proof is there that there will be any genetic remainder? are you saying that the colloidal silver has forever changed the genetic code of that plant that up until now was stable over multiple generations? prove it.
Science already has, it has obviously altered the original genetic code just for the simple fact that all of the offspring are female. A female is still being pollinated by a female and a male is required to impart certain genetic material. Where is the science that says using a sex reversal agent on a female to pollinate another female doesn't effect the genetics? There is none. How about instead of saying "prove it" you go down to the local library, read a book, and show me where it says this doesn't effect the genetics.
the best weed i grew/smoked was from feminized seeds,it was dinafems mazari,great smoke,great yeild.the only time i have had males was from autoflower strains or when i have bought regular seeds.i might have just been lucky but every fem seed i have grown it has been female.
i will continue to use feminized seeds from now on and i'm not going to stop because some weed grower thinks he is some sort of snob and that all feminized seeds are shit.thats just sheer dumb ignorance.
Can you read? No one ever said that you wouldn't get quality smoke from these plants. I was talking about the genetic changes and the long term effects of this practice. Saying you got quality results from growing fem'd seeds in no way proves anything other than you base your entire outlook on limited experiences without any scientific basis. Did you have the genetic code mapped on your fem'd plants or grow out thousands of samples and there offspring? Unless you did there is no way you can say for sure that this had no negative effects on the genetics. I'm sorry I hurt your feelings enough for you to call me a snob but I guess when you don't have any knowledge to support your position there is always insult.