even it was pollinated (not fertilized) by another sherbert it wouldnt be the same. it would be sherbert x sherbert. which could be completely different than the mom.
Um..the above statement by mantle was correct. 'Fertilizing' can however also refer to adding nutrients to media.
Your reason wasn't really explaining much.It "
could be completely different"..but it
could be extremely similar.
If I selfed an oldschool homozygous Durban Poison you'd not be able to tell the difference between the mum and the offspring.
Whether or not the offspring are the same or even similar depends on the zygosity of the genes.
Simplified, it means if all the genes code for the same phenotypes, the plants will come out very similar if not the same (think of oldschool IBLs etc. all seeds look like clones they are so similar). But if the elite selfed parent is a random polyhybrid bagseeds that is extremely heterozygous then the chances of selfing it and getting anything like the parent is extremely small. That's the main issue with a lot of the breeders now. They just grab some new 'elite' unstable cuts and self them. The offspring are all wildy different and are, at best, not the elite cut as advertised. Not necessarily bad, just not likely to be like the mother.