londonfog
Well-Known Member
Stand for something or die like a pu$$y.There is a difference between accepting and having acts thrown on you by force/violence.
I think you have chosen the latter
Stand for something or die like a pu$$y.There is a difference between accepting and having acts thrown on you by force/violence.
Zionism is, in principle, the ultra nationalist sect of Judaism, it advocates the right to a Jewish state (contrary to the writings of the Torah.)I think the meaning of Zionist in your words was the answer others were searching for
Stand for something or die like a pu$$y.
I think you have chosen the latter
Again..ive said this before..7 BILLION people on this little rock with nowhere else to go. People of your kind..of your ilk that subscribe to that philosophy of rugged individualism..individual rights..property rights..etc. Come the fuck on. It would be fine if there were a cap on population growth or no such thing as finite resources (the entire planet is one big finite resource) or we discovered a new and habitable planet with a realistic means of getting there but we havent. Your philosophy is old. Dusty..tired and has been kicked around now like a used up dirty ole bottle. For survival...real true survival...your gonna have to try a little harder than the old tri cornered hat bullshit. Yawn...one big yawn. We need new ways of thinking that's light years beyond all of that. Next......So, when you stand for schools teaching kids not to bully other people and then advocate funding those same schools via a threat to steal a persons home for not paying up, what are you standing for ?
Again..ive said this before..7 BILLION people on this little rock with nowhere else to go. People of your kind..of your ilk that subscribe to that philosophy of rugged individualism..individual rights..property rights..etc. Come the fuck on. It would be fine if there were a cap on population growth or no such thing as finite resources (the entire planet is one big finite resource) or we discovered a new and habitable planet with a realistic means of getting there but we havent. Your philosophy is old. Dusty..tired and has been kicked around now like a used up dirty ole bottle. For survival...real true survival...your gonna have to try a little harder than the old tri cornered hat bullshit. Yawn...one big yawn. We need new ways of thinking that's light years beyond all of that. Next......
Yawn Rob Roy...one big yawn. Tired..so damn tired.That was quite a dismissive rant, yet it didn't explain why you think anyone has the right to force another person to pay for something they don't agree with.
Could you give an on point reason for why you exempt government from acts of forcible confiscation (theft) but you would likely see theft as a bad thing if you or I did it?
That was quite an on point and persuasive argument.Yawn Rob Roy...one big yawn. Tired..so damn tired.
it's not a threat, it's an agreement between two parties which you voluntarily signedSo, when you stand for schools teaching kids not to bully other people and then advocate funding those same schools via a threat to steal a persons home for not paying up, what are you standing for ?
it's not a threat, it's an agreement between two parties which you voluntarily signed
pay up, mooch
you voluntarily signed an agreement in which you would be responsible to pay your property taxes, or else you'd lose your home, robertaIf your house will be stolen with or without your consent are you still claiming that represents a voluntary interaction ?
Or have you been sniffing glue again today and your strongest argument will be an amazing penis cloud ?
Please. Still clinging to a simple world. Its not at all. Far from it. If you plan to live in a society...you are bound by those societies rules. If the group doesn't see it the same and by what defines "theft" by you...your shit outta luck moocher. Go find your own planet. This one is quite crowded enough without your definitions of personal property. Were all gonna have to get used to that.If your house will be stolen with or without your consent are you still claiming that represents a voluntary interaction ?
Or have you been sniffing glue again today and your strongest argument will be an amazing penis cloud ?
Please. Still clinging to a simple world. Its not at all. Far from it. If you plan to live in a society...you are bound by those societies rules. If the group doesn't see it the same and by what defines "theft" by you...your shit outta luck moocher. Go find your own planet. This one is quite crowded enough without your definitions of personal property. Were all gonna have to get used to that.
taxes are not theft because the government can not take them unless you agree to pay them robertaThe action is constant, what escapes you is, you are suggesting that theft becomes "not theft" based on who does it. Which is a rationalization and a poor one at that.
Further you suggest threats if you or I make them are bad, but if other "people" make them, that act somehow becomes acceptable.
Learn to word, or at least admit you are changing the definition of an act based on who does it.
You sound an awful lot like people who murder others and call it "collateral damage" .
Then beg your wonderful government to let you7 billion people and counting I think we all are gonna have to get used to a few things and situations being involuntary. This isn't Manifest Destiny and tri - cornered hat times anymore pal. We have nowhere else to go. All 7 billion.
Listen to yourself. I know your type. Homestead. Wow. Listen dork...the world isn't like what you think it is Ben Franklin.Then beg your wonderful government to let you
homestead a piece of "their" land and see what their answer is Serf.
Things have been involuntary for a long long time, where have you been ? It's time to replace thuggery with peace.
taxes are not theft because the government can not take them unless you agree to pay them roberta
you are misusing words completely again, like usual
Listen to yourself. I know your type. Homestead. Wow. Listen dork...the world isn't like what you think it is Ben Franklin.
Can you imagine 7 billion people thinking like Rob Roy? You would have 500,000 owning EVERYTHING. All the land..all the resources. All of it. And everyone else a bunch of share croppers in a short amount of time. What's to stop a Rob Roy from acquiring more land and more resources to the point where only he benefits and slapping a fence up all around it? For your bullshit to work Rob you need unlimited resources...infinite land to acquire with way less resource consuming people. Your shit is flawed pal. By reason of sanity.