Doer
Well-Known Member
I bet no one has thought about this. 1) the emerging nations have to be paid to go along with this rip.....so a double rip off. 2) no one can say why their precious computer models don't predict this flat spot. We should be quite bit warmer by now, these last 15 years, plus a measurable rise is sea leave, but there are not these data. All this energy in, but somehow unaccounted for. Maybe we don't have the entire picture, huh? Maybe the Saganists are wrong again.
3) no one account for global shipping.
April 23, 2009 The Guardian has reported on new research showing that in one year, a single large container ship can emit cancer and asthma-causing pollutants equivalent to that of 50 million cars. The low grade bunker fuel used by the worlds 90,000 cargo ships contains up to 2,000 times the amount of sulfur compared to diesel fuel used in automobiles. The recent boom in the global trade of manufactured goods has also resulted in a new breed of super sized container ship which consume fuel not by the gallons, but by tons per hour, and shipping now accounts for 90% of global trade by volume.
----------
That says nothing of all the fuel we burn to protect it all. So, all shipping can't be 50 million cars each. But, let us say the average is 20 million car pollution, carbon credits per ship x 9000 ships in service.
That is the pollution of 1.8 billions autos, all over our oceans every year. According to a report from Ward's Auto the global number of cars exceeded 1.015 billion in 2010, jumping from from 980 million the year before.
So, doesn't anyone see the problem? The oceans are completely unregulated and account for a doubling of the pollution and carbon credits needed over auto mfg.
No wonder Al Gore is a rich turd bird.
3) no one account for global shipping.
April 23, 2009 The Guardian has reported on new research showing that in one year, a single large container ship can emit cancer and asthma-causing pollutants equivalent to that of 50 million cars. The low grade bunker fuel used by the worlds 90,000 cargo ships contains up to 2,000 times the amount of sulfur compared to diesel fuel used in automobiles. The recent boom in the global trade of manufactured goods has also resulted in a new breed of super sized container ship which consume fuel not by the gallons, but by tons per hour, and shipping now accounts for 90% of global trade by volume.
----------
That says nothing of all the fuel we burn to protect it all. So, all shipping can't be 50 million cars each. But, let us say the average is 20 million car pollution, carbon credits per ship x 9000 ships in service.
That is the pollution of 1.8 billions autos, all over our oceans every year. According to a report from Ward's Auto the global number of cars exceeded 1.015 billion in 2010, jumping from from 980 million the year before.
So, doesn't anyone see the problem? The oceans are completely unregulated and account for a doubling of the pollution and carbon credits needed over auto mfg.
No wonder Al Gore is a rich turd bird.