That's because the weatherman made you forget. He's in your T.V. and he's watching you. Go check the kitchen drawers, you know the one under the junk drawer and above the dish towels, the one with all the plastic baggies, paper lunch sacks and where the tinfoil used to be. See? Tin foils missing isn't it? Obviously you used it for something.
).
Ahhh
Nope, the aluminum foil is where it normally is. I just checked, lol.
exactly so leave this thread go to thread heaven where it belongs...
I am deeply distrustful of "stimulant/agonist" nootropes. I remember the disaster that was L-Dopa.Ahhh
Well, I've found my short Piracetam experiment to be worthy of a second trial, at least.
Noopept (1000x potency but 10% bioavailable, so it's really 100x) will be next, when my study-buddy gets some
It's conceivable the effects I felt initially were a result of prior neural abuse (from years of drinking and toking) being 'repaired'.
But I still can't discount the THCebo effect. More data is needed, since it is possible there is synergy, although that seems counter-intuitive.
However, it may be plausible in that THC does have a "zoning in" effect, coupled with increased throughput of the Corpus Callosum (via Piracetam) this may be the reason for the profound initial result. Subcool was advertising "TimeWreck" (before his departure) as being a study aid, so there may be something in that hypothesis--now if I could get my grubby mitts on some of that...
N-for-1 studies are rough...I need a gov't grant so I can dose a bunch of people
I have vague memories of something about that. L-Dopa is still used, though, for Parkinson's (and some other neurological disorders, I imagine).
Who do you want to hear it from?
HAARP is not even mentioned.
We agree that GMOs released into the environment is unwise. We agree that massive use of herbicides, insecticides, antibiotics and fungicides is an unwise practice with possibly huge unintended consequences. We agree that it is possible that the manufacturers of these things may be intentionaly hiding the most dangerous effects and we agree that it may take years for those effects to be seen in the general population or the environment.
Nothing wrong with setting up a treaty prohibiting something that no one has the ability to create. Controling the weather would certainly be a method of manipulating other countries in a variety of ways from destroying crops to flooding population centers to setting up conditions right for one side's military movements or bad for anothers.
No one wanted any moon bases, so we have the Lunar Treaty. I imagine if weather control was more than a local cloud seeding reality, there would be Treaty. And it will be a payola something like Kyoto, or Carbon Credits. The ones that can control the weather pay the others to keep quiet.
I watched a video that said there are already bases on the moon.