Satellite data proves Earth has not been warming the past 18 years - it's stable
- Thread starter sheskunk
- Start date
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
check the scales, retard. they do match.look at your graph, then look at the graph from "Skeptical Science" which CLAIMS to be sourced from the IPCC
and a graph from the ACTUAL IPCC report 4 (the purported source for the "skeptical science" infographic bullshit
why dont any of them match?
ask the climate frenzied touts.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
Not that I have seen, But, watch the droids shoot the messenger,
- Russia sucks
- this website sucks
- solar forcing sucks
www.climatedepot.com/2014/01/10/2103-peer-reviewed-study-contribution-of-the-greenhouse-effect-of-carbon-containing-gases-to-global-warming-turns-out-to-be-insignificant-by-s-v-avakyan-writing-for-the-herald-of-the-russian/
did you not notice his completely political take on the issue?
,"The switch of world powers first to decreasing the use of fossil fuel and then to carbon-free energy within the framework of the Kyoto Protocol may lead to economic collapse for Russia as a consequence of the reduction and, probably, even loss of the possibility to sell oil and natural gas on the world market."
sheskunk
Well-Known Member
You're the retard.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
glorious comeback. hope you didn't sprain anything coming up with that.
sheskunk
Well-Known Member
How many years have you been typing comments here? And you have yet to master the art of capitalizing the first word of a sentence. Fucking retard. Or just a lazy piece of shit.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
why so bitter? did you exhaust the supply of chocolate chip cookies within a 100 mile radius?
sheskunk
Well-Known Member
Why are you so retarded?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
because i engage with people like you regularly.
sheskunk
Well-Known Member
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
yOU ARE A FAT CUNT.
sheskunk
Well-Known Member
Why are you so bitter?
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
i did not claim.
i PROVED that the "citation" in your fail ass cartoon was fake.
the 6 billion tonnes from the report cited had no relation to the 29 billion the dopey cartoon claimed
if they wanted to claim the actual global total number (sorta) for 2007, why did they feel the need to claim a totally unrelated totally different report from 3 years earlier?
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
they Sorta match, in a general way, but since they claim to be direct from the IPCC's data why dont they match exactly?
why was the editing necessary?
why wasnt the editing noted?
what was the additional source from which they gained the differing data that required the edits?
science doesnt work that way.
if i claim i got my data from a source, and the data i use is different from the claimed source, then SOMETHING is wrong.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
i am lying?
you waved that cartoon around, pretended it was factual, claimed it's citation was valid and acted like a smug twat without bothering to check the purported source.
much like Joe McCarthy and his empty satchel of "evidence" your dopey little cartoon was a PROP with no substance
that you are able to retcon some other bullshit (that still doesnt match the claim) from years later is no more valid than the fact that there were in fact a few communists in hollywood and government
neither you nor Tailgunner Joe were right, your claims are still lies, and your ex post facto claims of "exoneration" through unrelated FURTHER claims are irrelevant
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
yes.
when clearly, a simple google search of "EIA 2007 tonnes of CO2" leads me to...
http://www.eia.gov/cfapps/ipdbproject/iedindex3.cfm?tid=90&pid=44&aid=8
which states that...
Total Carbon Dioxide Emissions from the Consumption of Energy (Million Metric Tons)
World29,733.483
you are a horrible liar and not to be trusted to interpret anything other than stormfront euphemism.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
and yet that data wasnt released by the EIA until 2010, the "citation" for the 2007 report had NOTHING to do with the claim
make all the butthurt sigs you like Taillgunner Joe, youre still lying.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
http://www.eia.gov/cfapps/ipdbproject/iedindex3.cfm?tid=90&pid=44&aid=8
i will let the reader decide.