UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
SHOW ME IRAN"S ROUTE TO THE SEA!Damn boy, you will bite onto anything you believe in no matter how shitty it tastes....
SKEWED POLLS!
FOREST FIRES CAUSE GLOBAL WARMING!
SHOW ME IRAN"S ROUTE TO THE SEA!Damn boy, you will bite onto anything you believe in no matter how shitty it tastes....
check the scales, retard. they do match.look at your graph, then look at the graph from "Skeptical Science" which CLAIMS to be sourced from the IPCC
and a graph from the ACTUAL IPCC report 4 (the purported source for the "skeptical science" infographic bullshit
why dont any of them match?
ask the climate frenzied touts.
Not that I have seen, But, watch the droids shoot the messenger,
- Russia sucks
- this website sucks
- solar forcing sucks
www.climatedepot.com/2014/01/10/2103-peer-reviewed-study-contribution-of-the-greenhouse-effect-of-carbon-containing-gases-to-global-warming-turns-out-to-be-insignificant-by-s-v-avakyan-writing-for-the-herald-of-the-russian/
check the scales, retard. they do match.
glorious comeback. hope you didn't sprain anything coming up with that.You're the retard.
glorious comeback. hope you didn't sprain anything coming up with that.
why so bitter? did you exhaust the supply of chocolate chip cookies within a 100 mile radius?How many years have you been typing comments here? And you have yet to master the art of capitalizing the first word of a sentence. Fucking retard. Or just a lazy piece of shit.
why so bitter? did you exhaust the supply of chocolate chip cookies within a 100 mile radius?
because i engage with people like you regularly.Why are you so retarded?
*Bbecause i engage with people like you regularly.
yOU ARE A FAT CUNT.
yOU ARE A FAT CUNT.
i did not claim.31 billion tonnes is so close to the 6 billion tonnes that you initially claimed.
they Sorta match, in a general way, but since they claim to be direct from the IPCC's data why dont they match exactly?check the scales, retard. they do match.
i am lying?awwww, kynes is upset about being wrong so often and getting caught lying even more often.
yes.i am lying?
when clearly, a simple google search of "EIA 2007 tonnes of CO2" leads me to...in 2007 there was a little less than SIX billion of CO2 released.
and yet that data wasnt released by the EIA until 2010, the "citation" for the 2007 report had NOTHING to do with the claimyes.
when clearly, a simple google search of "EIA 2007 tonnes of CO2" leads me to...
http://www.eia.gov/cfapps/ipdbproject/iedindex3.cfm?tid=90&pid=44&aid=8
which states that...
Total Carbon Dioxide Emissions from the Consumption of Energy (Million Metric Tons)
World29,733.483
you are a horrible liar and not to be trusted to interpret anything other than stormfront euphemism.
http://www.eia.gov/cfapps/ipdbproject/iedindex3.cfm?tid=90&pid=44&aid=8the "citation" for the 2007 report had NOTHING to do with the claim