that should be no problem when they need a cake or a florist or a photographer for their GAY WEDDING CEREMONY.
you are so smart.
if only you were around 50 years ago, the blacks would have known to just paint themselves white.
fuck, you could have solved slavery with a few million gallons of primer.
you sir, are a fucking genius. even for sock puppet standards.
So you don't think there are any gays that provide those services?
You don't think the majority of straight business owners would gladly perform these services for their normal fee?
You're either retarded or manipulative.
You were either too stupid to see I was talking about anonymity for getting and keeping their jobs, being allowed to eat inside of the restaurant, being able to set in the decent seats at a movie theater, and getting to go to the decent school in town?
And of course you could just have a cake with no top ornament.
You could just not tell the florist to send the gay flowers.
Not sure how you get past the photographer, but plenty of gay people have good cameras also.
You're the type that will never let the truth or reality get in the way of proving your point.
The portion of businesses out there that would even consider refusing their services to someone because the customer is gay is infinitesimal.
In the 1920's when literally everyone white refused to service blacks it caused severe harm, compounded by the fact that those with the ability to provide the services were almost exclusively white.
Today, with gays, only a small minority of non gays would deny them, this is mitigated by the existence of homosexual business owners, since unlike blacks in 1934, there are no hurtles or road blocks to gays owning property and opening bank accounts.
If a gay couple happens to call one of the photographers who would refuse to service them, it is but another phone call away from finding one who will.
The main difference is this, currently those who refuse to service gays are not only a minority, but the law is silent. Not only did blacks face a world where they had no place to go in and enjoy a decent meal, it wasn't a prejudiced owner impending them, it was state law forbidding them from getting that service.
Yes, civil rights for gays is the main issue in 2014. If nothing else, it is a sign of how far we've come.
If I were to make an analogy, to building a house, ending slavery and establishing full legal and civil equality to blacks was like laying the exterior brick, hanging the sheet rock, finishing the carpentry work inside, wiring the appliances and amenities, and putting the roof on.
Giving gays what they are seeking, which I will say needs to be done, is more akin to choosing the silver ware and bed sheets to make the house a home.
It's like curing the beast cancer (the blacks struggle) and then the recovering woman seeks to get her dandruff under control.
It ought to be done, but it is a false analogy and pales in comparison.
