UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
77,900 < 80,800 actually.their unemployed population is getting larger
math really isn't your thing.
77,900 < 80,800 actually.their unemployed population is getting larger
and thats an unsourced number so obviously argument isnt your thing77,900 < 80,800 actually.
math really isn't your thing.
that number is sourced actually. check the link you responded to.and thats an unsourced number so obviously argument isnt your thing
washington state's "job growth" is far slower than the rate of new workers minus the retiring workers, which is why their ranks of Not Working Persons is growing, even while their "unemployment rate" remains fairly steady, since "unemployment" only rep[resents those actually getting a check for unemployment.
Bullshit.that number is sourced actually. check the link you responded to.
unemployed numbers also count people who are looking for work, not just those getting a UI check.
nope.Bullshit.
the unemployment number ONLY represents those who are receiving benefits.
And how exactly do they get this information? Any number on this stat is pure guesswork no matter how you slice it.unemployed numbers also count people who are looking for work, not just those getting a UI check.
it's done by a scientific household survey you fucking dolt.And how exactly do they get this information? Any number on this stat is pure guesswork no matter how you slice it.
nope.
maybe try actually looking at the citations i provide next time.
thats people OVER 16 but UNDER 65 you moron.and it really is amazing that the labor force rate started going down 65 years after the post-WWII baby boom.
who would have ever seen that one coming?
better blame obama.
He's flailing, like a cod on the deck of the boat.so theres a government office where you sign up to say youre looking for a job?
damn youre dumb.
thats UNEMPLOYMENT CHECKS you dolt.
to qualify for the unemployment check you must be "actively looking for work"
those who are NOT recieving a check for unemployment, either because they were declined, their benefits expired, or they have never had a job before, as well as those who have given up on work (like you) are NOT COUNTED you insufferable fool.
"Keep Obama in president, he gave us a phone,he's gonna do more!"thats people OVER 16 but UNDER 65 you moron.
you just cant accept that shit sucks because bwana obama is at the helm.
he doesnt inspire confidence, he constantly threatens and browbeats people and companies who ACTUALLY employ people, and his economic policies are destroying the country.
that makes for FEWER jobs, and more people going on the dole, and the new hotness, "disability"
no it's not.it's done by a scientific household survey you fucking dolt.
apparently all the people in cleveland, low minority, got obama phone."Keep Obama in president, he gave us a phone,he's gonna do more!"
it would be kinder to whack him with the gaff and tip his rotting carcass overboard, but the stink will remain, until we holystone the decks.He's flailing, like a cod on the deck of the boat.
Kinda funny to watch, but you know inside its cruel to just let it happen.
Wanna do a "scientific" analysis on the deuce I just dropped??it's done by a scientific household survey you fucking dolt.
Somebody should bash its cod-like head in with an oar. So much suffering...He's flailing, like a cod on the deck of the boat.
Kinda funny to watch, but you know inside its cruel to just let it happen.
And what was your conclusion?
you might want to look into how they calculate unemployment numbers, you blithering shitcunt.so theres a government office where you sign up to say youre looking for a job?
damn youre dumb.
thats UNEMPLOYMENT CHECKS you dolt.
to qualify for the unemployment check you must be "actively looking for work"
those who are NOT recieving a check for unemployment, either because they were declined, their benefits expired, or they have never had a job before, as well as those who have given up on work (like you) are NOT COUNTED you insufferable fool.