New Evidence in Michael Brown Case

N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
nope, not a single word from anyone about "charging".

dummy.
Click to expand...
It corroborates the officers story, the officer's story is that brown rushed him.

So sorry little bucky, maybe next time you will have an argument with legs to stand on, but I am not holding my breath.
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Harrekin said:
Until 8+ eyewitnesses corroborate his story...
Click to expand...
Because Wilson is white and Brown was black, the case has ignited intense debate over how police interact with African American men. But more than a half-dozen unnamed black witnesses have provided testimony to a St. Louis County grand jury that largely supports Wilson’s account of events of Aug. 9, according to several people familiar with the investigation who spoke with The Washington Post.

Some of the physical evidence — including blood spatter analysis, shell casings and ballistics tests — also supports Wilson’s account of the shooting, The Post’s sources said, which casts Brown as an aggressor who threatened the officer’s life. The sources spoke on the condition of anonymity because they are prohibited from publicly discussing the case.
The grand jury is expected to complete its deliberations next month over whether Wilson broke the law in confronting Brown, and the pending decision appears to be prompting the unofficial release of information about the case and what the jurors have been told.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/new-evidence-supports-officers-account-of-shooting-in-ferguson/2014/10/22/cf38c7b4-5964-11e4-bd61-346aee66ba29_story.html
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
Because Wilson is white and Brown was black, the case has ignited intense debate over how police interact with African American men. But more than a half-dozen unnamed black witnesses have provided testimony to a St. Louis County grand jury that largely supports Wilson’s account of events of Aug. 9, according to several people familiar with the investigation who spoke with The Washington Post.

Some of the physical evidence — including blood spatter analysis, shell casings and ballistics tests — also supports Wilson’s account of the shooting, The Post’s sources said, which casts Brown as an aggressor who threatened the officer’s life. The sources spoke on the condition of anonymity because they are prohibited from publicly discussing the case.
The grand jury is expected to complete its deliberations next month over whether Wilson broke the law in confronting Brown, and the pending decision appears to be prompting the unofficial release of information about the case and what the jurors have been told.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/new-evidence-supports-officers-account-of-shooting-in-ferguson/2014/10/22/cf38c7b4-5964-11e4-bd61-346aee66ba29_story.html
Click to expand...
That physical evidence must be racist.
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Harrekin said:
That physical evidence must be racist.
Click to expand...
It's hard to believe the cops.
They lie
They steal
In Ferguson where most of the residents are black. All but 3 of the cops are white.
What do you expect? Who the residents going to believe? The cop?
In this case the cop isnt lying.

You know who I feel bad for? the witnesses at the Grand jury. Their names are going to come out and they are going to pay the price fo their testimony
 
jahbrudda

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
audio you speak of was debunked by the same man giving the CNN interview. His name is Micheal T Brady
Click to expand...
Where did you get confirmation that Michael Brady was the same guy in the audio saying Brown came back towards the cop?

A link would be nice, if you are correct, lets see it.
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
Because Wilson is white and Brown was black, the case has ignited intense debate over how police interact with African American men. But more than a half-dozen unnamed black witnesses have provided testimony to a St. Louis County grand jury that largely supports Wilson’s account of events of Aug. 9, according to several people familiar with the investigation who spoke with The Washington Post.

Some of the physical evidence — including blood spatter analysis, shell casings and ballistics tests — also supports Wilson’s account of the shooting, The Post’s sources said, which casts Brown as an aggressor who threatened the officer’s life. The sources spoke on the condition of anonymity because they are prohibited from publicly discussing the case.
The grand jury is expected to complete its deliberations next month over whether Wilson broke the law in confronting Brown, and the pending decision appears to be prompting the unofficial release of information about the case and what the jurors have been told.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/new-evidence-supports-officers-account-of-shooting-in-ferguson/2014/10/22/cf38c7b4-5964-11e4-bd61-346aee66ba29_story.html
Click to expand...
[EDITOR’S NOTE: After this story was published, the forensic pathologist interviewed by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch and quoted below said that some of her statements about Michael Brown’s autopsy were taken out of context by the newspaper
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
jahbrudda said:
Where did you get confirmation that Michael Brady was the same guy in the audio saying Brown came back towards the cop?

A link would be nice, if you are correct, lets see it.
Click to expand...
do your homework. Cnn found the guy who was on the audio. Too bad Chesus ignores anyone who proves him wrong
 
jahbrudda

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
do your homework. Cnn found the guy who was on the audio. Too bad Chesus ignores anyone who proves him wrong
Click to expand...
London, you are one of the first people to scream your lungs out wanting a citation.
You made the claim my friend, now back it up with some facts.
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
jahbrudda said:
London, you are one of the first people to scream your lungs out wanting a citation.
You made the claim my friend, now back it up with some facts.
Click to expand...
This has been posted before. I got an idea you tell me the name of the person on the audio or are you saying you are clueless to who is on the audio.
 
jahbrudda

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
This has been posted before. I got an idea you tell me the name of the person on the audio or are you saying you are clueless to who is on the audio.
Click to expand...
London, you made a claim that the Michael Brady interview "debunks" the previous audio witness stating Brown turned back towards the cop.

If it's been posted before it should be very easy for you to post it again.
You are always asking other people for citations.
Telling me to do my research when you can't substantiate your own claim makes everyone think you a hypocrite and a complete liar.
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
jahbrudda said:
London, you made a claim that the Michael Brady interview "debunks" the previous audio witness stating Brown turned back towards the cop.

If it's been posted before it should be very easy for you to post it again.
You are always asking other people for citations.
Telling me to do my research when you can't substantiate your own claim makes everyone think you a hypocrite and a complete liar.
Click to expand...
Guy it's funny that you two bozos are speaking and screaming about an audio and you can't even give the name of who is on it. Brady is the guy on the audio which was on a youtube video first. Do your damn homework if you care to debate.
 
sheskunk

sheskunk

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
Guy it's funny that you two bozos are speaking and screaming about an audio and you can't even give the name of who is on it. Brady is the guy on the audio which was on a youtube video first. Do your damn homework if you care to debate.
Click to expand...

You're losing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top