Man-made global warming is a lie and not backed up by science, claims leading meteorologist.

[abandonconflict]

You asked for sources, you got 23.

Thanks for that half a wikipedia page...

 

[Harrekin]

so now wikipedia is a good source. a couple of posts ago they weren't.

your trolling is beyond shitty.

You know those things called "references" ??

They're generally links to journal articles.

Seriously tho, are all you lefties this retarded?

At least Padawanrapist can "talk the talk".

 

[UncleBuck]

You know those things called "references" ??

They're generally links to journal articles.

Seriously tho, are all you lefties this retarded?

At least Padawanrapist can "talk the talk".

so the journal articles wikipedia summarizes are good, thus wikipedia is no good.

got it.

makes perfect sense.

 

[Harrekin]

so the journal articles wikipedia summarizes are good, thus wikipedia is no good.

got it.

makes perfect sense.

The references are not the article itself.

The references are links to peer reviewed scientific papers in this case.

Or could you not tell the difference?

 

[abandonconflict]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles

Just read it. I read it.

 

[Harrekin]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles

Just read it. I read it.

Lol, you are so fucking dumb it hurts.

 

[abandonconflict]

Lol, you are so fucking dumb it hurts.

He copy pasted half the page, I read the page.

What am I missing here?

Did you read the page?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles

Do you agree with it?

 

[Harrekin]

He copy pasted half the page, I read the page.

What am I missing here?

Did you read the page?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles

Do you agree with it?

I havent read any of the 23 sources he posted, have you?

I dont need some retards summation of other peoples scientific work, I know how to access journal articles.

But nah nah, Im not telling.

 

[abandonconflict]

Do you really think I have been arguing about climate change online for months while traveling around the world and never stumbled across Milankovitch theory? That's why I said Heckler made a good point.

 

[Harrekin]

Do you really think I have been arguing about climate change online for months while traveling around the world and never stumbled across Milankovitch theory? That's why I said Heckler made a good point.

Pretenders gonna pretend.

You read a Wiki article and now think youre a "Science Guy" but you dont even know what a reference to a published journal article is.

Its hilarious.

 

[abandonconflict]

Pretenders gonna pretend.

You read a Wiki article and now think youre a "Science Guy" but you dont even know what a reference to a published journal article is.

Its hilarious.

I already admitted that I lost this round by internet technicality rules. I'm not the one who posted half a wiki page.

derp

So do you or do you not agree with Milankovitch theory?

 

[Harrekin]

I already admitted that I lost this round by internet technicality rules.

So do you or do you not agree with Milankovitch theory?

Dude, I can admit my ignorance when Im ignorant on a subject.

You cant even spot 23 references to scientific journal articles tho.

Ill give you a hint, if you could read the references you'd know they're actually written that way for a reason, it gives information of the publication it appeared in, who authored it, etc and most of the time in the case of a link to an online reference sometimes the date and time of retrieval is included.

 

[abandonconflict]

Dude, I can admit my ignorance when Im ignorant on a subject.

You cant even spot 23 references to scientific journal articles tho.

Ill give you a hint, if you could read the references you'd know they're actually written that way for a reason, it gives information of the publication it appeared in, who authored it, etc and most of the time in the case of a link to an online reference sometimes the date and time of retrieval is included.

you keep saying "23 references" but what you really mean is that part of a wikipedia page that NoDrama copy pasted, right?

Did you read the wiki page they came from though?

 

[NoDrama]

you keep saying "23 references" but what you really mean is that part of a wikipedia page that NoDrama copy pasted, right?

Did you read the wiki page they came from though?

Orbital theory has "overwhelming" support.
Which means nothing, but sounds like you don't want to be one of those "Weird" people that doesn't support it do you?

 

[Harrekin]

Orbital theory has "overwhelming" support.
Which means nothing, but sounds like you don't want to be one of those "Weird" people that doesn't support it do you?

Dude he asked for links after you gave him references.

Ive tried talking to him, he just doesnt get it.

 

[abandonconflict]

So you do, in fact agree with Milankovitch theory?

 

[Harrekin]

So you do, in fact agree with Milankovitch theory?

Ive already admitted Im ignorant on that subject.

At least I know where to find the information should I want to instead of reading Wikipedia and thinking Im a "science guy".

 

[sheskunk]

 

[abandonconflict]

Ive already admitted Im ignorant on that subject.

At least I know where to find the information should I want to instead of reading Wikipedia and thinking Im a "science guy".

I'm with you, I was hoping for something better than half of a wikipedia page.

 

[NoDrama]

So you do, in fact agree with Milankovitch theory?

Is there some reason we should not support it?