Man-made global warming is a lie and not backed up by science, claims leading meteorologist.

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
actually, yes.

beenthere and harrekin are saying it hasn't warmed in 20 years. NLXSK and red1966 claim the earth is cooling.



and NASA too.

and 34 national academies of science.

hell, even the people in beenthere's video say so.



science provides evidence, not proof. science can't prove a damn thing.

but thanks for demonstrating your lack of understanding.
The videos I posted say quite the opposite, you're saying this in hopes nobody takes the time to watch it.
UncleBuck has to lie to bolster his narrative, thankfully everyone is aware of that fact.

He also has to hide behind the mods by reporting other members that expose his stupidity
this kind of fool would get the snot kicked out of him for doing that shit in real life.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
The videos I posted say quite the opposite, you're saying this in hopes nobody takes the time to watch it.
UncleBuck has to lie to bolster his narrative, thankfully everyone is aware of that fact.

He also has to hide behind the mods by reporting other members that expose his stupidity
this kind of fool would get the snot kicked out of him for doing that shit in real life.
But weren't you the guy who started a thread by citing the guy from channel 51?
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
But weren't you the guy who started a thread by citing the guy from channel 51?
That guy is batshit crazy, watch his CNN interview. Talk about journalistic integrity, CNN has none. He did that Megyn Kelly interview and spouted his denier beliefs then CNN invited him on to do the same shit. It's funny, the hoaxorz crowd can't seem to find anyone credible... or intelligent to put explain their position in any calm or logical way, I wonder why that is...



Lol
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
I've never backed up a guy who reports other members to the mods, have you?
If you disagree with the site rules everybody agrees to when they join the forum, take it up with the admin. Complaining about Buck reporting sock accounts makes you look like a crybaby

Don't wanna get reported, don't break rules, nothing could be more simple. You learn this shit in kindergarten

Now back to your journalist-scientist who founded the weather channel and his denier hoaxorz conspiracy theories you agree with
 

heckler73

Well-Known Member
lindzen would call heckler's views on CO2 "nutty".
I don't know...I imagine Lindzen would entertain me for 5 minutes. He would probably want me to do more heavy lifting before discussing "my theory" (whatever it may be).
But you bring up an interesting point. How would you describe the differences between what Lindzen and I believe regarding CO2?


 

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
I'll give you credit for being the only one here to have almost cited decent research but you consistently misunderstand your own citations and they end up actually supporting the IPCC position. You also omit links when you do. Nonetheless I'll give you props for providing peer reviewed citations. The only smart guy on your side (Heckler) made a good point.

So here is a chance for you guys to actually get some momentum. Because let's face it, the only reason these threads are constantly shifting through talking points is that we keep destroying all of the talking points you guys resort to.
LOL you actually believe yourself, don't you.

Either you are very deceptive or you can't fully understand the citations I supply.
I've yet to give a citation that supports AGW, even the nasa and noaa links I gave admit a pause in warming.
The abstracts from the peer reviewed articles clearly demonstrated their strong doubts, so whatever you're trying to pull is falling on deaf ears.

Here's a fact, neither you, padaraper or UB could come close to making sense of a peer reviewed article, you have a hard time grasping the abstracts as it is.

You are right about heckler, he's probably the only one here that can make heads or tails of the articles and arguments, but don't put yourself a category close to him, because nobody's going to buy it.

So here's your chance to come down to earth, because you're not the intellect you project to be.
 
Last edited:

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
If you disagree with the site rules everybody agrees to when they join the forum, take it up with the admin. Complaining about Buck reporting sock accounts makes you look like a crybaby

Don't wanna get reported, don't break rules, nothing could be more simple. You learn this shit in kindergarten

Now back to your journalist-scientist who founded the weather channel and his denier hoaxorz conspiracy theories you agree with
I just don't back up whiners who report members, you can support anyone you like.
But you're no better.

I have a copy of you doing the same exact thing, and on a weed site no less.
That ain't cool bro.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I've yet to give a citation that supports AGW
except for of course all the articles you posted which do support AGW.

even the nasa and noaa links I gave admit a pause in warming.
except for all the warming that they clearly say is happening.

i guess if you ignore 80% of what they say and focus exclusively on 20%, then you can delude yourself as you tend to do.

The abstracts from the peer reviewed articles clearly demonstrated their strong doubts
articles?

you have only posted one actual peer reviewed article, and it supported that the earth is warming, which contradicts everything else you have cited.

Here's a fact, neither you, padaraper or UB could come close to making sense of a peer reviewed article
you cite holocaust denier victor thorn and white supremacist jared taylor, you can't make sense of reality itself.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
That ain't cool bro.




jahbrudda (aka beenthere) trusts these two sources more than he trusts NASA, which he has called a communist george soros funded conspiracy, right before he cited their work.

beenthere, things are not going so well for you.

stick to stuff you are good at, like growing moldy yellow weed and being racist.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I don't know...I imagine Lindzen would entertain me for 5 minutes. He would probably want me to do more heavy lifting before discussing "my theory" (whatever it may be).
But you bring up an interesting point. How would you describe the differences between what Lindzen and I believe regarding CO2?


from what i can tell, even skeptics like lindzen feel that your idea that CO2 is not as much of a greenhouse gas as widely believed is "nutty".

lindzen would say that CO2 is of course a greenhouse gas, you are trying to intimate that it is not as much of a greenhouse gas as widely believed due to some shit about wavelengths.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
I just don't back up whiners who report members, you can support anyone you like.
But you're no better.

I have a copy of you doing the same exact thing, and on a weed site no less.
That ain't cool bro.
You whine about members who report trolls

I reported one troll who had 5 posts and no avatar for being an obvious sock account, and you're on your second sock account right now, beenthere

Don't break rules and you won't be banned and have to create more sock accounts to come back and try to troll with. Leave your butthurt about it at the door, I certainly am not interested in hearing it
 

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
You whine about members who report trolls

I reported one troll who had 5 posts and no avatar for being an obvious sock account, and you're on your second sock account right now, beenthere

Don't break rules and you won't be banned and have to create more sock accounts to come back and try to troll with. Leave your butthurt about it at the door, I certainly am not interested in hearing it
Who made you the forum police?
I'm just saying, you can ask anybody on this forum if they agree that members should report other members, only whiney bitches themselves wouldn't have a problem with it.

Shall we try?
 

sheskunk

Well-Known Member
You whine about members who report trolls

I reported one troll who had 5 posts and no avatar for being an obvious sock account, and you're on your second sock account right now, beenthere

Don't break rules and you won't be banned and have to create more sock accounts to come back and try to troll with. Leave your butthurt about it at the door, I certainly am not interested in hearing it

You sound like a COP.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Tell us again how man is effecting climate change.
buckroast!
human activities in the last 100+ years have sent CO2 skyrocketing up to 400 PPM, which is higher than it has been in 800,000 years. CO2 is a greenhouse gas which traps heat, leading to the sudden and rapid warming of global temperatures over that time.

see how easy that was?
 

sheskunk

Well-Known Member
human activities in the last 100+ years have sent CO2 skyrocketing up to 400 PPM, which is higher than it has been in 800,000 years. CO2 is a greenhouse gas which traps heat, leading to the sudden and rapid warming of global temperatures over that time.

see how easy that was?

So now what?
 
Top