Is hydroponics better for the environment? I think it is.

AlphaPhase

Well-Known Member
Organics was by far more expensive and labor intensive, for me at least, than hydroponics. But, someone also mentioned the recycled organic soils, I just don't think that would be plausable on a large scale, but I do not know much about the whole TLO thing besides mixing up some super soils here and there... Following a rather large recipe of ingredients.. And the time it takes to "cook". I could have a whole crop finished with hydro before my organic soil is finished cooking :p
 

Heisenberg

Well-Known Member
It's nice to see that a group of stoners is actually having a more informed and intelligent discussion about organics than most any other place on the internet. These are the sort of conversations people should be having. No red herrings about Monsanto, none of the typical myths the organic lobby spreads about increased nutrition or zero pesticide use. No fear mongering over "toxins" or nonsense about "superfoods".

Seriously, it's refreshing.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
It's nice to see that a group of stoners is actually having a more informed and intelligent discussion about organics than most any other place on the internet. These are the sort of conversations people should be having. No red herrings about Monsanto, none of the typical myths the organic lobby spreads about increased nutrition or zero pesticide use. No fear mongering over "toxins" or nonsense about "superfoods".

Seriously, it's refreshing.
Well, now that you brought it up, what about those "toxins" or nonsense about "superfoods"...just kidding!

Perhaps its the selected group reading this thread. It could also be the experience through the misinformation spread by the war on drugs. You learn to set a low threshold on the bullshit detector.

I must say that some organic foods taste better to me. Carrots, for instance. The difference may be due to something other than growing method, like the variety or extra care given to them but mass-produced carrots from my local grocery store aren't as good. The cost isn't that much more for the organically grown ones that I like either. So I mix and match according to preference. Potatoes, broccoli, lettuce, not better so I go conventional there.

Switching back to the hydro discussion. This thread twigged me to read up on aquaponics, where fish and veggies are grown in the same tank. Very interesting to me.
 

AlphaPhase

Well-Known Member
I agree heisenberg, most threads on these sort of topics are shit shows. It's nice to have discussions like adults and exchange information without the thread turning into a dick swinging contest. I've always noticed with a majority of the organic/ non organic crowds, it's one way or the highway and nobody on one side wants to hear anything about the other side, even though it would be beneficial. People aren't allowed to have an opinion unless they have knowledge of BOTH sides, then and only then can a true opinion be formed.. A one sided opinion is not an opinion at all, that's just called being ignorant :p

Fogdog- I've definitly had some great organic food. My brother eats mainly organic food and some things he finds are way better than something from a chain store.. But like you said, that could be because the chain store food was poorly grown or the farmer had a bad season ect. Who knows lol. I've had great non organic food from the farm stands as well. Also, it seems anything grown at home, in whatever soil, tastes 10x better as well, I think being attentive to the garden is key.
 

Tone5500

Well-Known Member
Any beef that is grass fed is way better imo , and from a nutrtion stand point you can't aruge that grass fed beef and cage free vegetarian fed chickens aren't better for you with that said I eat both and belive the stress people put themselves though worrying about is worse for your health then all of it .
 

AlphaPhase

Well-Known Member
Free range beef is by far better than the regular stuff! I love some good grass fed beef or steaks. You got a good point there, too, Tone, the stress from people thinking about what's good and not will kill em quicker than a 3 pack a day cigarette habit. Stress is no joke.
 

churchhaze

Well-Known Member
Just emptied out one of my DWC totes that was practically empty already.. 4 gallons went in, almost 0 came out. If only I could say things go that smoothly every single time. That's very little waste, and wasting very little water. (which isn't an issue around here, but important for places limited in fresh water).
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Just emptied out one of my DWC totes that was practically empty already.. 4 gallons went in, almost 0 came out. If only I could say things go that smoothly every single time. That's very little waste, and wasting very little water. (which isn't an issue around here, but important for places limited in fresh water).
that is amazing
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Well...of course, if I grow it, its the best evah. (except my wine which is, well lets just say that its better than a cheap red, I have a lot to learn)
I agree heisenberg, most threads on these sort of topics are shit shows. It's nice to have discussions like adults and exchange information without the thread turning into a dick swinging contest. I've always noticed with a majority of the organic/ non organic crowds, it's one way or the highway and nobody on one side wants to hear anything about the other side, even though it would be beneficial. People aren't allowed to have an opinion unless they have knowledge of BOTH sides, then and only then can a true opinion be formed.. A one sided opinion is not an opinion at all, that's just called being ignorant :p

Fogdog- I've definitly had some great organic food. My brother eats mainly organic food and some things he finds are way better than something from a chain store.. But like you said, that could be because the chain store food was poorly grown or the farmer had a bad season ect. Who knows lol. I've had great non organic food from the farm stands as well. Also, it seems anything grown at home, in whatever soil, tastes 10x better as well, I think being attentive to the garden is key.
o
 

AlphaPhase

Well-Known Member
Lol, I hear ya fogdog. You'll get better at making it, it is a tedious process to get it perfect. The only wine I've made was dandelion wine, it was ok I guess, but had an ew factor to it lol. I really like hard apple cider, I need to learn how to make that sometime.
 

Dr. Who

Well-Known Member
And about the wheat issue... In a lot of places in the world, people have foolishly built cities on the most fertile flood plains, while the rest of the country is desert. (Egypt).

In order to feed/grow their population, they need to figure out a way to use their sandy soil to produce, or force people to move their cities from the floodplains to the desert so they can farm the floodplains.

I think hydroponics is perfect for this type of sandy soil, as I said earlier in this thread, because of the obvious drainage properties of soil, and it's inability to hold nutrients and water. Under these conditions, they might be best off growing everything hydroponically.

Nutrient run off is a problem. It happens in animal waste fertilization. It would happen with that sandy soil and syhthetics too...The damage to local watersheds would be increasingly bad for the balance of such a fragile ecosystem.....Just look at the lower Great Lakes basin and the algae blooms in lake Erie as a simple example of both forms of run off problems.

Look, all I can say in response to that is thankfully not everyone thinks like you do - the wealth of great minds at such institutions as MIT certainly don't. Look at how technology has evolved in just the last 100 years alone, slightly more than the average lifespan of a single human primate. Who would have thought in 1913 when Henry Ford developed the first mass-production assembly line that just 50 years later humans would land on the moon, and who in 1969 would have thought just 40 years later we would be developing the technology to send a rover to the icy oceans of Europa in search of life?

Anyway, the folks in question don't give a flying you know what about profit - they work for food. And with the billions of dollars of international aide allocated to Africa alone each year, I think it's well within the realm of possibility for hydroponic greenhouses to be set up in these regions in the near future and sustained relatively inexpensively as church just touched on.
Off topic point: It was Ransom E. Olds that invented the Assembly line, not Ford....Ford made it move, increasing out/through put.;)

ON topic: (I must have been across the pond when this topic hit and missed it.. A GOOD ONE)!
This is a question that has been asked in lecture's I've given. This poses problems on several fronts. First off, many of these 3rd world countries are run by despot rulers who steal everything they can from the counties coffers. You cannot simply give monetary aid and expect it to get where/be spent on the intended project....Cost to scale problems are a factor and distribution of the end product comes into play also. To spend big $ on a large scale project involves many things.
Logistics becomes a very important player in this idea. Simply getting the needed fuel to distribute the end product, not to mention the supplies to the manufacturing facility are difficult at best....roads are basic and unpaved. Distances are great between many places on the African continent.
The materials needed to build a facility of more then local effectiveness is beyond hard to come by. Everything must be imported. Now you have to consider the actual nutrients involved. Not much going on there as far as making useable refined nutrients. Ok, P is mined there for the world. But not only is the refining done elsewhere. But the sustainability of mined P is becoming quite a question for the near future - world wide!
Ok, so I know at this point you'll bring up the experiments on making "synthetic P"....Yes, it is going on. There have been several results tested and found working....But guess what? The cost of manufacture is a severely limiting problem right now....
How about importing? Logistics and material cost....again!....The trade barriers between countries there are a consideration that cannot be ignored also.
Ok then, how about small scale facilities that work on a more local approach?
Logistical problems still make this a very hard proposition to do......Hell, in most area's water is a major limiting factor. Not to mention electricity!!! Most area's have none or are limited by generators that run on that hard to get fuel! Most electrical use in rural area's are dedicated to school's - That's a GOOD thing! The next is to pump water....
You said water is a problem,,,how so?
To get and keep water at usable levels for a hydroponic facility to actually be viable...would strip water from other use's....like watering cattle and farmed food stuff's grown. In Africa, cattle are like money....The "rich" out side of large metro area's have the most cattle....dowries are paid in cattle and are haggled over before the betrothal! Water in many area's is like gold....highly sought after! Most local proteins are chicken, goat and sometimes pork....Even then, it mostly saved for special occasions!

So what do think could maybe work?
Aquaponics on workable scales are possible for small to medium communities. That's right we're back to organic's! This solves problems on the logistical and financial fronts. Not only is vegetable matter supplied, but protein, in affordable forms (Tilapia) becomes available to those who cannot "afford" cattle.....In fact cattle supply more milk then meat in the "bush".....
You must remember that vegetable matter over there is legumes as in beans and peanuts with a cpl of other pod producers in there too, tubors - Cassava type melons mixed with a bean paste to make a poi like paste, and mainly corn, ground and like "mush" in the southern states here. The rainy season brings insects that they eat with joy! There are "Greens" of a sort. Most people fish on some level, area dependent.....Still, fish supplies a lot of the consumed protein on the continent.
Aquaponics fits this niece well. It will supply the protein and the vegetable matter.....Feeding the fish has several possible and sustainable methods. And yet still....It has it's limiting factors too. Feeding the Tilapia can involve more then growing duckweed as amino acids are needed.....BUT, duckweed will work to make edible size fish.....Then your looking at other plants in the soup too. plants for human consumption....There is still sludge "waste" that needs to be removed as it settles on the bottom of the culture "tank". This has benefits for outdoor soil farming as it is vermicomposted!!!!

The whole idea of hydroponics feeding the 3rd world is a nice thought.....sustainability is a real future concern...Water would HAVE to be stripped of nutrient content and reused by any workable means that are affordable, as fresh water is fast becoming a world problem....condensate stripping would work, but what do you do with the left over waste? Figure that one out and get rich! Hmm,,,,,light bulb! I ain't telling you what I just thought :lol:...

Natural nutrient supplies are dwindling = P,,,, and "synthetic" P is a ways away yet and we don't know if it will have any repercussions down the road healthwise...

There's a few thoughts from someone who speaks on the idea of sustainable farming practice, old world farming technique and modern farm organics along with natural farm cost reductions....

Doc
 
Last edited:

Dr. Who

Well-Known Member
Organics was by far more expensive and labor intensive, for me at least, than hydroponics. But, someone also mentioned the recycled organic soils, I just don't think that would be plausable on a large scale, but I do not know much about the whole TLO thing besides mixing up some super soils here and there... Following a rather large recipe of ingredients.. And the time it takes to "cook". I could have a whole crop finished with hydro before my organic soil is finished cooking :p
We do it on a 3 farm co-op.....100% organic and we use old world farming technique to reduce cost and hydrocarbon use.....Cattle are grass feed until finish or where we used our own grown grain to finish for higher fat content (We even use the waste "mash" from beer or ethanol production)....Cattle are grazed, they poop and when the field needs to "rest" we moved chicken pens on skids across them gradually to have the chickens eat bugs and seeds in the field. They also help us by spreading the cow manure out by scratching, searching for food in seeds and insects in the manure thus spreading it for us so we don't have to! This field is then reused for grazing OR planted with needed crops with a nice nutrient base now spread about....The bio's counts in this soil are high and active, bring this "available" nutrition built for a cpl of years into play for the crops....The beef is finer and commands high price's. A lot of our meats go to high end dinning establishments in several surrounding states,,as with the chicken and the pork we raise..Not to mention the eggs that have almost orange yolks from feeding naturally along with our own mixed feeds, from our own grain products.
In the barn, manure is turned by the hogs doing their natural rooting thing. Again these things reduce greatly fuel consumption, and farming costs....any unneeded colostrum milk is given to the hogs as is acorns from the area....makes fine creamy tasting pork! We have an organic dairy (where the colostrum milk is from) and make organic cheese's for our families and to some local farm markets for sale to the public.....

The whole SS idea is basically a MM and house potted veggie thing......I mean I do build my soil for the farm...but in a more natural way.....Being diverse is how we are able to be profitable!

Now remember, this is a 3 farm co-op, all organic!

Doc
 
Last edited:

AlphaPhase

Well-Known Member
Right on Dr who. Great post. It sounds like your doing things properly, I just wish I could say that about the other 95% of farming. You make alot of great points in your post, but there's also the problem of much land just plain sucks for soil farming. It would take some time to build the soil up to workable conditions. I mentioned aquaponics in here somewhere, I too think that is the best of both worlds. Someday it will catch on I'm sure.
 

rob333

Well-Known Member
We do it on a 3 farm co-op.....100% organic and we use old world farming technique to reduce cost and hydrocarbon use.....Cattle are grass feed until finish or where we used our own grown grain to finish for higher fat content (We even use the waste "mash" from beer or ethanol production)....Cattle are grazed, they poop and when the field needs to "rest" we moved chicken pens on skids across them gradually to have the chickens eat bugs and seeds in the field. They also help us by spreading the cow manure out by scratching, searching for food in seeds and insects in the manure thus spreading it for us so we don't have to! This field is then reused for grazing OR planted with needed crops with a nice nutrient base now spread about....The bio's counts in this soil are high and active, bring this "available" nutrition built for a cpl of years into play for the crops....The beef is finer and commands high price's. A lot of our meats go to high end dinning establishments in several surrounding states,,as with the chicken and the pork we raise..Not to mention the eggs that have almost orange yolks from feeding naturally along with our own mixed feeds, from our own grain products.
In the barn, manure is turned by the hogs doing their natural rooting thing. Again these things reduce greatly fuel consumption, and farming costs....any unneeded colostrum milk is given to the hogs as is acorns from the area....makes fine creamy tasting pork! We have an organic dairy (where the colostrum milk is from) and make organic cheese's for our families and to some local farm markets for sale to the public.....

The whole SS idea is basically a MM and house potted veggie thing......I mean I do build my soil for the farm...but in a more natural way.....Being diverse is how we are able to be profitable!

Now remember, this is a 3 farm co-op, all organic!

Doc
that's just being a hippy ;)
 

hyroot

Well-Known Member
I just came across this thread its mostly nonsense. Organics is far cheaper than hydro. The reason farmers switch to hydro or chems is because they own farm and equipment. But not the seed nor the plants. They get penalized if they don't reach certain yields from their supplier / buyer. They pretty much work for salary. And make pennies. So they need those huge yields to get their bonuses and not be penalized.

now the environmental aspect.hydro is detrimental to the environment. All those resi's that get dumped, stalks roots that get tossed are filled with chemicals that pollute and contaminate ground soil , ground water, lakes, rivers, oceans. Organics does none of that. Now miming bat caves for guano is bad for their ecosystem. Those pathogens are harmful to people. Not the environment. It was doing fine before we came along.

peat is organics. The peat bogs take hundreds of years to develop.
 

churchhaze

Well-Known Member
Nutrient run off is a problem. It happens in animal waste fertilization. It would happen with that sandy soil and syhthetics too...The damage to local watersheds would be increasingly bad for the balance of such a fragile ecosystem.....Just look at the lower Great Lakes basin and the algae blooms in lake Erie as a simple example of both forms of run off problems.
Non-hydroponic farms also fertilize their fields with "chemicals". Dirt farmers use a ton of fertilizer as well. The choice isn't "hydroponic vs animal waste", it's inert medium vs soil. Organic heads just have this idea that soil somehow means organic. Soil is actually mostly inorganic. What makes a medium "soil" is that it contains inorganic minerals to feed your plant, like iron and zinc oxides, calcium carbonate etc. What makes it hydroponic is the inorganic minerals come from the water instead of the soil.

The minute someone makes a general statement like "synthetics are XYZ", i tend to stop taking their opinion on chemistry and the environment seriously. Talk about specific chemicals, or you're just a quack. I've never been convinced by voodoo or juju before.

Edit: Keep in mind, I never said pollution wouldn't be a problem. If you think we're making too large of an impact on the environment, stop having so many children. You aren't going to make an appreciable impact on our footprint by using animal waste and crop rotation. The reason we have been switching away from those practices has been has nothing to with obligations to big mean corporations... it has to do with an obligation to feed 7-8 billion hungry people who are quickly reproducing without concern for the environment. People can't continue to have 3-5 kids, then turn to their kids and expect them to use crop rotation to get by when we lived an abundant lifestyle. That's immoral.
 
Last edited:

churchhaze

Well-Known Member
I just came across this thread its mostly nonsense. Organics is far cheaper than hydro. The reason farmers switch to hydro or chems is because they own farm and equipment. But not the seed nor the plants. They get penalized if they don't reach certain yields from their supplier / buyer. They pretty much work for salary. And make pennies. So they need those huge yields to get their bonuses and not be penalized.
This whole paragraph is a contradiction. You start off by assuring people that organics is "far cheaper" than hydro, then go on to mention the reason some farmers have to break down and choose the more expensive option (usually not hydro either) is to make more money.. What a contradiction! These non-organic crops almost always cost less than their "organic" counterparts, and add no value to my cooking other than a warm fuzzy feeling I seem to not get.

Hydroponic crops are a completely different story than field crops that use synthetics. Its sad people associate hydroponically grown crops with any other crop grown with synthetics, as if synthetic vs non-synthetic is the key determinant to what makes a method good. Because of this, "organic growers" don't educate themselves on the differences between various farming practices, and only see the most superficial differences. You use different chemicals when growing hydroponically than most farmers use in dirt. But who cares, right? Chemicals are chemicals, and synthetics are synthetics. The less you know, the better off you are, right? Ignorance is bliss.

stalks roots that get tossed are filled with chemicals that pollute and contaminate ground soil , ground water, lakes, rivers, oceans.
..... hyroot, please... Throwing away stems will contaminate the ground water? How is anyone, even the nuttiest of organic hipsters, supposed to take you seriously when you say things like this? I'm actually at a loss for words. And "Organics does none of that"? Hyroot, you need to get out of the nutter cult you're in and get a breath of reality. Stop making completely ridiculous claims like everyone's stems being poisonous but yours. Not only is it wrong, it's actually very offensive. You invite yourself to the retaliation of all the people you insulted with your BULLSHIT accusations. Are you going to accuse us of poisoning the well next?
 
Last edited:

hyroot

Well-Known Member
This whole paragraph is a contradiction. You start off by assuring people that organics is "far cheaper" than hydro, then go on to mention the reason some farmers have to break down and choose the more expensive option (usually not hydro either) is to make more money.. What a contradiction! These non-organic crops almost always cost less than their "organic" counterparts, and add no value to my cooking other than a warm fuzzy feeling I seem to not get.

Hydroponic crops are a completely different story than field crops that use synthetics. Its sad people associate hydroponically grown crops with any other crop grown with synthetics, as if synthetic vs non-synthetic is the key determinant to what makes a method good. Because of this, "organic growers" don't educate themselves on the differences between various farming practices, and only see the most superficial differences. You use different chemicals when growing hydroponically than most farmers use in dirt. But who cares, right? Chemicals are chemicals, and synthetics are synthetics. The less you know, the better off you are, right? Ignorance is bliss.



..... hyroot, please... Throwing away stems will contaminate the ground water? How is anyone, even the nuttiest of organic hipsters, supposed to take you seriously when you say things like this? I'm actually at a loss for words. Organics does none of that? Hyroot, you need to get out of the cult you're in and get with reality.
.they switch to chems for larger yields. They get paid a flat salary . If they go below a certain number they get penalized. Some dont even get paid. The ones with small yields. The suppliers wont let them farm unless they upgrade their equipment out of their own pocket.

they don't get paid per bushel ot weight

if they underperform they're given shitty unstable seed. They're under contract so they can't sell to any one else or take seed from anyone else. Its the same for chicken farmers too. Its a vicious cycle. How is that contradictory? Did you just cherry pick certain words or did read the whole thing?

chemicals pollute. Those stalks have chemicals in them. Flushing plants only removes salts not nutrients. The stalk may break down . The chemicals left behind do not break down.
 
Top