citation or it never happened.
EXCUSE ME?!..The OFFICIAL Bernie Sanders For President 2016 Thread
- Thread starter schuylaar
- Start date
or the late 1800's poor houses, asylums, no equality for women..people dying in the street.
whoa! sounds like 2015
why don't you?
Bugeye
Well-Known Member
Hypothetical - Hillary bows out due to email issues and Joe get in the race with Obama's support, can Bernie hope to compete against that sort of political machine? He has certainly managed to survive the Clinton political machine, but not sure this was so much his doing vs. Hillary's trustworthiness issues.
I sort of thought Hillary had it sewn up 6 months ago, but now I just don't understand the email management. How is it possible that the SOS could have all her email go through a private server and none of it be confidential? That just doesn't add up so maybe I am missing something...
I sort of thought Hillary had it sewn up 6 months ago, but now I just don't understand the email management. How is it possible that the SOS could have all her email go through a private server and none of it be confidential? That just doesn't add up so maybe I am missing something...
it's as simple as setting up a gmail account and running through their server. although i suspect google has a much more secure server than the state department.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
or the late 1800's poor houses, asylums, no equality for women..people dying in the street.
whoa! sounds like 2015
You've mischaracterized.
Why do you harsh on the "gay nineties" ? Don't you like gay people?
The United States has more people in prisons now than it ever did.... and in 1890 something, weed was just another plant and you could ingest it or sell it if you wanted to without people like Bernie Sanders wanting to put you in jail for it.
Bugeye
Well-Known Member
Seems like she was running her email through her own server, backed up by a server in a bathroom in CO? Isn't the issue that she wasn't running her emails through the government servers?it's as simple as setting up a gmail account and running through their server. although i suspect google has a much more secure server than the state department.
Grandpapy
Well-Known Member
And now the war between the lesser of two, three...evils.
What should the USA do to stop Koch (1%ers)? Our actions are going effect your government and Quality of life.
What would you do based on our minimum options?
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
http://www.macrotrends.net/1377/u6-unemployment-rate
Just once Sky, try to get your facts straight.
Of course, a well educated workforce actually adds to GDP, unlike middle aged unemployed people with no marketable skills...not even in fast food...
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
What would I do? Fair question sir. I already do it. Here, I ad nauseausly foment discussion of why a coercive government needn't be the status quo.
In real life, when I'm not being a Sasquatch I work on building personal independence, energy, food, etc. and align with others to create peaceful alternatives to a coercive government.
I don't have a government, I own myself...although some people with guns insist I'm involved in THEIR government whether I've consented to it or not. That can admittedly create some conflicts.
i appreciate that you actually googled something..next time try a government site for government information.
pro tip hint: you couldn't find it because it's a state requirement and would have to google the specific state.
each state calls it something different..florida is UCT-6, if you are in conversation with someone in minnesota, they will have no idea what you're talking about.
http://dor.myflorida.com/dor/forms/2012/uct6.pdf
oh! and thank you for posting so negatively against what YOU already have..stay classy
Last edited:
MuyLocoNC
Well-Known Member
Of course it is and if it were ANYONE besides a high level Democrat during this administration's embarrassment of a justice department, they'd already be indicted.
Grandpapy
Well-Known Member
I admire that and believe that is a worthy goal for mankind.
But in the meantime, I would be content to see a peaceable/pollution free future for my children.
Bugeye
Well-Known Member
I'm wondering if the writing is on the wall and Joe is timing his run with the timing of indictments he knows are coming?
i don't know the governments set-up, but i'm gonna say they don't have cloud computing due to security while so many other options are available..she just bypassed in order to have her email available from any device is my thought.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Realistically speaking, if a governments foundation is involuntary (no real chance of NOT being encompassed within it) then it is formed at its foundation via coercion.
There is no possible way of having a "peaceful" future if all governments break the peace from the get go. It is logically impossible.
As far as pollution goes, don't ask the EPA to do anymore ahem "work" in Colorado, they might fuck up another river.
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
It's got nothing to do with that, if you'd read the link I posted its a measure of unemployment.i appreciate that you actually googled something..next time try a government site for government information.
pro tip hint: you couldn't find it because it's a state requirement and would have to google the specific state.
each state calls it something different..florida is UCT-6, if you are in conversation with someone in minnesota, they will have no idea what you're talking about.
http://dor.myflorida.com/dor/forms/2012/uct6.pdf
oh! and thank you for posting so negatively against what YOU already have..stay classy
And I wasn't posting negatively about our system, I think it's great and our unemployment levels are still lower despite the incentive not to work.
Grandpapy
Well-Known Member
I agree again, but in the meantime, US Oil interests are focused on Siberia as the Ice melts.
I would love to see a government free world, I would also like to lose weight, but is best to do it slowly so it will stay off.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
I would love to see a world where people can run their own lives, but not the lives of others who are being peaceful. Panarchy, comes to mind.
That doesn't mean "no government" necessarily, it means the option of voluntarily not being part of a something that somebody else has predetermined for you, with or without your consent.
As far as losing weight, good luck with which ever method you chose.
um, like these guys?:
dontchya just love it when someone else parties on your money/weed..only to turn around..laugh at us..and negotiate better terms on dodd-frank with intention to REPEAL entirely?
who the hell cares that hillary thinks christie is a tub..trump a lout..i mean WTF is in these emails of importance?..NADA! what's really funny is, the right establishment has not caught on to the fact that it is they who are paving the way for bernie..
they outsmart themselves and THAT! is their consistent!
Last edited: