2014 was definitely the hottest year on record

Bugeye

Bugeye

Well-Known Member
heckler73 said:
Tasty Spoonful #2:

Step 1 : Elimination of dubious records (do_comb_step1.sh)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Data and station information are combined in a data base. Some unphysical
looking segments of data records were eliminated after manual inspection of
unusual looking annual mean graphs and comparing them to the corresponding
graphs of all neighboring stations. The data are converted back to a text version.

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/sources_v3/gistemp.html
For a more passive comprehension session:
Click to expand...
Guys like this will soon be in jail. Like this guy knows more about the climate than Al Gore? LOL
Thanks for sharing, I enjoyed it.
 
Wavels

Wavels

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
Yeah, when the sun turns into a red giant... in a couple of billion years. In the meantime the earth will be struck by multiple planet-killing comets, and space aliens will invade and eat every damn one of the delectable humans roaming the planet.

The earth abides. Some people will get that reference.
Click to expand...
Well as I see it, there are two references that are noteworthy...
1) The Dude Abides---Big Lebowski---great film.
and/or
2) Earth Abides---great book.




Earth Abides
by George R. Stewart

A disease of unparalleled destructive force has sprung up almost simultaneously in every corner of the globe, all but destroying the human race. One survivor, strangely immune to the effects of the epidemic, ventures forward to experience a world without man. What he ultimately discovers will prove far more astonishing than anything he'd either dreaded or hoped for.

http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/93269.Earth_Abides
 
Wavels

Wavels

Well-Known Member
heckler73 said:
Tasty Spoonful #2:

Step 1 : Elimination of dubious records (do_comb_step1.sh)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Data and station information are combined in a data base. Some unphysical
looking segments of data records were eliminated after manual inspection of
unusual looking annual mean graphs and comparing them to the corresponding
graphs of all neighboring stations. The data are converted back to a text version.

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/sources_v3/gistemp.html
For a more passive comprehension session:
Click to expand...
The Catastrophic AGW gestapo has placed Keen on the official "denier list"...hahhaha
They would prefer to censor him, or maybe even put him in jail...that's science ya know...hahahaa
"The science is settled"....hahaha...is there a less scientific pronouncement out there???

It is all about politics, science has left the building!
Too funny...
 
Last edited:
Wavels

Wavels

Well-Known Member


Dr. David Evans was a climate modeler for the Australian government. He has six degrees in applied mathematics. In analyzing "complex mathematical assumptions widely used to predict climate change," he predicts stable temperatures until 2017, after which the Earth will cool for the next decade, ushering in a mini-ice age by 2030.

.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
In other words, the "consensus" climate scientists are saying, to quote Groucho Marx, "Who are you going to believe: me or your own eyes?"

Carbon dioxide, or CO2, is the villainous greenhouse gas causing global warming, according to the EPA. CO2 emission in the U.S. increased by about 7% from 1990 to 2013, predominantly due to an expanding economy and population. Yet a closer look at the trend shows a drop in CO2 emissions after 2007, approaching 1990 levels. And don't forget that CO2 is plant food, necessary for the trees and crops used to house and feed our growing population.




Instead, the media is ignoring the story, as it doesn't fit the narrative of man-made global warming. No surprise. "These findings here are unlikely to be popular with the establishment. The political obstacles are massive," notes Dr. Evans.
Is Dr. Evans right about the mini-ice age in 2030? Time will tell. What about some of the other global warming predictions involving temperatures, snow, hurricanes, and polar ice that have not come true?




Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/10/the_climate_is_indeed_changing_cooling_ahead.html#ixzz3oZWFauW6
 
Rrog

Rrog

Well-Known Member
On the one hand you have the vast majority of the scientific community and most educated earthlings worldwide.

On the other you have a small group of zealots in denial. Sort of like the folks that deny we went to the moon or deny the world is round. These opinions just don't matter
 
Wavels

Wavels

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
By all means, feel free to link a peer reviewed study which contradicts the consensus regarding the vast body of research saying that man made global warming is real.

Even just one.
Click to expand...

Hahaha...you were presented with dozens, you glibly dismissed them all...as if you read even one...
You prefer to quaff voluminous quantities of Government provided Kool-Aid...like a good brainwashed acolyte...because everyone knows Government sponsored science is always correct and unimpeachable...hahaha!!
 
Bugeye

Bugeye

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
By all means, feel free to link a peer reviewed study which contradicts the consensus regarding the vast body of research saying that man made global warming is real.

Even just one.
Click to expand...
CO2 as a greenhouse gas is pretty undisputed. The amount of warming that can be expected from AGW is the question. Could you point me toward a 97% consensus on what this amount of warming will be?
 
Wavels

Wavels

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
He was a computer modeler for the Australian Greenhouse Office, which was disbanded shortly after he left the job.

Still waiting for a PEER REVIEWED STUDY CONTRADICTING AGW.
Click to expand...
Too predictable...hahaha.
You dismiss any, and all peer reviewed studies which contradict your religion...hahaha.
You are simply a governmental lackey...and amusingly enough, you embrace anarchy...go figure!
Holy macaroni!
 
Wavels

Wavels

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
No, I was presented with an article from popular bullshit which didn't even claim to have a single one that contradicts AGW, ya dingus.
Click to expand...
Wow, read much?
Comprehension seizure?...oops no, you have consumed sufficient Kool-Aid...to render you impervious to contemplating or perusing anything which may ruffle your panties....
Good job.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top