abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Hypothetical is the losing word in a debate abut the findings of science, ya dingus.Losing words...
Hypothetical is the losing word in a debate abut the findings of science, ya dingus.Losing words...
Hypothetical is the losing word in a debate abut the findings of science, ya dingus.
Recycle, ride your bicycle, grow your own VEGETABLES, even aquaponics. Telecommute, support a CO² cap and trade scheme, buy fewer things that last longer, buy, drive and maintain an older car instead of buying a new one... it just takes some creative thinking.So how many solutions have the scientists come up with yet ? or, Does it depend on How much $$$$ they get ?
I couldn't have said it any better.support a CO² cap and trade scheme
Recycle, ride your bicycle, grow your own VEGETABLES, even aquaponics. Telecommute, support a CO² cap and trade scheme, buy fewer things that last longer, buy, drive and maintain an older car instead of buying a new one... it just takes some creative thinking.
Hey, it made Al Gore hundreds of millions of dollars. Or was that when he sold his television station to an oil backed terrorist organization? Hard to keep these things straight!!I couldn't have said it any better.
Has anyone seen Tipper? It looks like Fat Al ate her. Either that or he gorged himself on Eco-Loon stupidity.Hey, it made Al Gore hundreds of millions of dollars. Or was that when he sold his television station to an oil backed terrorist organization? Hard to keep these things straight!!
I didn't delete anything ya dingus. I don't believe you think either. Have you figured out yet what Ranking of Record Years means?Lol, he deleted the post because he knew how stupid it would make him look. I could get rid of the hypothetical dates and use a ranking of years based on Joey Chesnut's hot dog eating results. Me thinks AC has finally admitted defeat.
Because it's a ranking of record years, ya dingus.Or ask AC why they used probability percentages on a ranking based on the percentage of probability that is totally not about probability, according to him.
You didn't?I didn't delete anything ya dingus. I don't believe you think either. Have you figured out yet what Ranking of Record Years means?
Definitive rankings of record years don't require percentages of probability. I'm sorry for your defeat, you'll get past it someday.Because it's a ranking of record years, ya dingus.
You should tell NASA.Definitive rankings of record years don't require percentages of probability.
No need, they already know it. No other reason they would include probability percentages.You should tell NASA.
Citation required.No need, they already know it.
Incorrect. Inclusion serves as proof.Citation required.
Hmm, that doesn't seem to be true, seeing as how the literature which accompanied that chart you're so fixated upon (the one with the header you fail to understand) clearly and concisely concludes unequivocally that 2014 was definitely the hottest year on record.Incorrect. Inclusion serves as proof.