Well yes and no. Maybe better efficiency can come from simply utilising the energy we're currently spending so much money on power to combat; Solar panels as roofing material. Fuel cells. Heat pumps. These have the ability to both do their jobs efficiently and do them without nearly as much damage to the environment.
Your employer did get a tax credit for hiring you because you are a felon recently release from prison. Same as hiring someone who is a military veteran. I doubt you make huge amounts of money at your shitty welding job. The money is in under water welding or Industrial pipes weldingI make huge amounts of money because the government pays 40% of my wages. Gotta love 'em.
So you don't believe in AGW, but you say it gives you better yields. There's only one person stupid enough to give that post a like and he also has a habit of replying to people he has on ignore.
ROFL!!!! I bet he will take you off ignore to read your post and then have another meltdown.
That's unfortunate. Take a gander at that vid when you find a computer.
Yes, but their 40+ year old reactors weren't. They were literally 3 generations behind, and should not be considered the current state of the technology.
You may need to be a little more specific on what the definition of "storms and natural disasters" means in the context used. I'm looking at (supposed) data which suggests otherwise.
That's unfortunate. Take a gander at that vid when you find a computer.
Yes, but their 40+ year old reactors weren't. They were literally 3 generations behind, and should not be considered the current state of the technology.
You may need to be a little more specific on what the definition of "storms and natural disasters" means in the context used. I'm looking at (supposed) data which suggests otherwise.
Were you aware that whenever the government "gives" you anything they had to take it from somebody else?
Looking at that graph, it actually does seem to show a trend towards more major hurricanes .That's unfortunate. Take a gander at that vid when you find a computer.
Yes, but their 40+ year old reactors weren't. They were literally 3 generations behind, and should not be considered the current state of the technology.
You may need to be a little more specific on what the definition of "storms and natural disasters" means in the context used. I'm looking at (supposed) data which suggests otherwise.
That's essentially flat bro...
That graph is skewed.
Maybe thats where the money in laundry service is, dirty fuckin underwear.