Flaming Pie
Well-Known Member
That was a horrible typo he made. LolBecause Donald didn`t use the word illegal,...kat42 just cheap shot you in the anchor eyelet. He goes right for the anchor chain, so beware.
That was a horrible typo he made. LolBecause Donald didn`t use the word illegal,...kat42 just cheap shot you in the anchor eyelet. He goes right for the anchor chain, so beware.
if you admit you are wrong and i answer your unrelated questions, that will still not provide a citation of a non-skinhead type who opposes the SPLC as vehemently as you do, klanman.Maybe this quote will help you understand why...
Is bear scat 42 dropping little shitlets again? I know. He pretends to go for the slow blow, right before he hits you with the low blow. Basically, all of his arguments boil down to one thing. - "this country was built on racism"Because Donald didn`t use the word illegal,...kat42 just cheap shot you in the anchor eyelet. He goes right for the anchor chain, so beware.
What he meant can be subject to interpretation. What he said can not. I don't have time to try and decipher his meaning, I'm just reading what he said.Because Donald didn`t use the word illegal,...kat42 just cheap shot you in the anchor eyelet. He goes right for the anchor chain, so beware.
No, I can read, you should try it.He was stating that his family came here legally to assimilate as Americans. Not to try and take it over as Germans.
It wasn't?Basically, all of his arguments boil down to one thing. - "this country was built on racism"
by the way, if you are going to directly plagiarize a white supremacist website, try to change at least a few of the words around so that it doesn't trace back to said white supremacist website.Nice copy and paste of what they claim to do. But they have a track record of not reporting liberal hate groups, and having bias anti-Christian views. Their outrage is subjective, selective, and never reckons progressive groups guilty of the same things of which it accuses others. the reason SPLC cannot or will not change its criteria or at least begin including left-wing groups on its hate lists is that it cannot go against its progressive donors who are sending in such sizable sums–$38.5 million a year, with $256 million in assets feeding $300,000+ salaries.
According to the analysis conducted by the Texas Department of Public Safety, foreign aliens committed 611,234 unique crimes in Texas from 2008 to 2014, including thousands of homicides and sexual assaults.
The criminal aliens identified by the Texas DPS have been responsible for the most heinous types of crimes — and in astonishing numbers. From the Texas DPS report:
A review of these 177,588 defendants shows that they are responsible for at least 611,234 individual criminal charges over their criminal careers, including 2,993 homicides and 7,695 sexual assaults.
Computers do that.What he meant can be subject to interpretation. What he said can not. I don't have time to try and decipher his meaning, I'm just reading what he said.
Labeled a hate group by none other than your beloved Southern Poverty Law Center. And you wonder why I don't put down citations for you. I bet you have one big "hate map" spread across the wall in your living room. Leaving off the biggest hate group all - SPLC. This is not a topic that the progressive media will pick up. If so, they would be labeled a hate group. It's just a list of groups that are not progressive. That's all. Nothing more.by the way, if you are going to directly plagiarize a white supremacist website, try to change at least a few of the words around so that it doesn't trace back to said white supremacist website.
http://www.amren.com/news/2014/03/study-southern-poverty-law-center-ignores-liberal-hate/
i'm just pointing out that you plagiarized a fucking white supremacy website.Labeled a hate group by none other than your beloved Southern Poverty Law Center. And you wonder why I don't put down citations for you. I bet you have one big "hate map" spread across the wall in your living room. Leaving off the biggest hate group all - SPLC. This is not a topic that the progressive media will pick up. If so, they would be labeled a hate group. It's just a list of groups that are not progressive. That's all. Nothing more.
This publisher here is considered racist by SPLC because of a book they published for somebody in France, 1971. LOL
http://www.thesocialcontract.com/answering_our_critics/southern_poverty_law_center_splc_info.html
can you clear up this apparent misunderstanding for me, munchbox?Oh come on. I don't defend racists. That's ridiculous.
Whats ridiculous is you calling me somebody named munchbox, and believing that there are 16,000 hate groups in America. Has the Donald Trump campaign officially made the hate list yet? LOLi'm just pointing out that you plagiarized a fucking white supremacy website.
that doesn't really mix well with your statements about how totally not racist you are.
can you clear up this apparent misunderstanding for me.
well, that's not clearing up my misunderstanding at all.Whats ridiculous is you calling me somebody named munchbox, and believing that there are 16,000 hate groups in America. Has the Donald Trump campaign officially made the hate list yet? LOL
The SPLC explains a lot about how you think everybody is a racist.well, that's not clearing up my misunderstanding at all.
you claimed that you do not defend racists, and then i catch you plagiarizing from a white supremacist website.
so either you were lying, or you are too stupid to realize you were lying. which is it?
pla·gia·rismThe SPLC explains a lot about how you think everybody is a racist.
That doesn't qualify as plagarism. They were numbers about salary information, and none of that post is anywhere near an original thought, that info is on numerous other websites as well. Also, that article is not copyright protected. Do you know what plagarism is? If it were a homework assignment, or I were to publish it, and it were copywritten, then it could be plagarism.
So how is it somebody else's work and ideas if I can post the same exact information from numerous other websites? And it's not a white supremacist website by the way.pla·gia·rism
ˈplājəˌrizəm/
noun
- the practice of taking someone else's work or ideas and passing them off as one's own.
so did you credit the author of that work for his idea, which comes from the white supremacy website "american renaissance"?
are you serious?So how is it somebody else's work and ideas
here are some comments of theirs in a recent thread about the university of missouri.And it's not a white supremacist website by the way.
i've been trolling them all day. it's been fun as shit."Whites are less than 10% of the population"?...
I don't even have to look up any statistics to know that's bullshit, what a retard