White people, particularly men:

abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
i think the white supremacist cop calls a bunch of stoners fascists and wishes prison upon them in order to convince us that his political ideology is the right one.

i'm not sure it's working, which just increases his natural oppression and persecution.
Click to expand...
Poor oppressed white racist cop...
 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Two black cops murder a six year old white child, and attempt to murder the child's father.

Is this persecution of white people, or just normal gangbanging behavior for cops? Would it be racial persecution if the murderers were white and the victims black? Would Bearkat be here complaining of his daily persecution?

I tend to think it is just ordinary, run of the mill cops being murderers, but the racist angle seems forever popular.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/06/us/louisiana-child-shooting-officers-arrested/
 
researching

researching

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
I wouldn't call it discrimination, but standards are definitely set differently for different races. I feel much more is expected of me because of my skin color than other people. I'm white so that means there are no obstacles other than my own work ethic in my way to success. Same thing with being male.

Imo, economic class is a better indicator of discrimination, race is just a coincidence
Click to expand...
Sorry, but you are wrong. Something called quotas are reverse discrimination. I lost out on a good job to a female because of quotas. How do I know? My friends brother was a senior manager there and said even though I had much more experience they chose to go with a female, as the company wanted to put more females in management roles.

The real kicker here is that after I left the interview which this particular manager was part of, The head manager said that even though I was more qualified, they could put the lady in the position and pay her less than me. Which incidently was less than the position started at. So, even though they want to advance women in the company and put more into management, they are still doing the wrong thing by paying less.

I have Native American blood in my lineage ( Cherokee ), so I have considered in the future to use the system to my advantage and put native on the application.

Whenever you hear "women and minorities are encouraged to apply" you already are at a disadvantage. I strongly believe people should be hired based upon their skill, merits, and experience. Hell, if this country can elect Obama then I think the nation has progressed enough that quotas should go bye bye. Or maybe that's how he got elected. Because most people with a modicum of knowledge know he had no experience other than a brief stint as a senator, and a community organizer with shady affiliations.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
researching said:
Hell, if this country can elect Obama then I think the nation has progressed enough that quotas should go bye bye. Or maybe that's how he got elected. Because most people with a modicum of knowledge know he had no experience other than a brief stint as a senator, and a community organizer with shady affiliations.
Click to expand...
hey racist clown,

quotas are illegal and always have been. maybe try being not dumb before opening your mouth.

sincerely,

unclebuck
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
Two black cops murder a six year old white child, and attempt to murder the child's father.

Is this persecution of white people, or just normal gangbanging behavior for cops? Would it be racial persecution if the murderers were white and the victims black? Would Bearkat be here complaining of his daily persecution?

I tend to think it is just ordinary, run of the mill cops being murderers, but the racist angle seems forever popular.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/06/us/louisiana-child-shooting-officers-arrested/
Click to expand...
why did you study to be a cop at napa JC, george?
 
bearkat42

bearkat42

Well-Known Member
researching said:
Sorry, but you are wrong. Something called quotas are reverse discrimination. I lost out on a good job to a female because of quotas. How do I know? My friends brother was a senior manager there and said even though I had much more experience they chose to go with a female, as the company wanted to put more females in management roles.

The real kicker here is that after I left the interview which this particular manager was part of, The head manager said that even though I was more qualified, they could put the lady in the position and pay her less than me. Which incidently was less than the position started at. So, even though they want to advance women in the company and put more into management, they are still doing the wrong thing by paying less.

I have Native American blood in my lineage ( Cherokee ), so I have considered in the future to use the system to my advantage and put native on the application.

Whenever you hear "women and minorities are encouraged to apply" you already are at a disadvantage. I strongly believe people should be hired based upon their skill, merits, and experience. Hell, if this country can elect Obama then I think the nation has progressed enough that quotas should go bye bye. Or maybe that's how he got elected. Because most people with a modicum of knowledge know he had no experience other than a brief stint as a senator, and a community organizer with shady affiliations.
Click to expand...
What in the hell is "reverse discrimination"? Sounds like that would be a good thing. If you reverse something that is bad, wouldn't that make it good?
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
researching said:
Sorry, but you are wrong. Something called quotas are reverse discrimination. I lost out on a good job to a female because of quotas. How do I know? My friends brother was a senior manager there and said even though I had much more experience they chose to go with a female, as the company wanted to put more females in management roles.

The real kicker here is that after I left the interview which this particular manager was part of, The head manager said that even though I was more qualified, they could put the lady in the position and pay her less than me. Which incidently was less than the position started at. So, even though they want to advance women in the company and put more into management, they are still doing the wrong thing by paying less.

I have Native American blood in my lineage ( Cherokee ), so I have considered in the future to use the system to my advantage and put native on the application.

Whenever you hear "women and minorities are encouraged to apply" you already are at a disadvantage. I strongly believe people should be hired based upon their skill, merits, and experience. Hell, if this country can elect Obama then I think the nation has progressed enough that quotas should go bye bye. Or maybe that's how he got elected. Because most people with a modicum of knowledge know he had no experience other than a brief stint as a senator, and a community organizer with shady affiliations.
Click to expand...
People, of all colors and both genders, are at an advantage or disadvantage according, primarily, to the economic class in which they reside. If you're poor, you have less opportunities than you would if you were rich. But being white, and specifically male, gives you an advantage that those who are not born white or male can enjoy. As a white male born on the lower end of middle class, my life hasn't been what I would call easy, so I can only imagine what a black person or other minority in this country has had to face. That's why when some people complain about social programs benefitting the unfortunate, I know it comes from a place of entitlement growing up in a world full of privilege.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
bearkat42 said:
What in the hell is "reverse discrimination"? Sounds like that would be a good thing. If you reverse something that is bad, wouldn't that make it good?
Click to expand...
Not in this instance. In both instances the discrimination arises from a third party imposing their will forcibly rather than thru a mutual and voluntary interaction.

To make it "good" would require ceasing the action itself, not changing who gets to hit who with the stick.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Not in this instance. In both instances the discrimination arises from a third party imposing their will forcibly rather than thru a mutual and voluntary interaction.

To make it "good" would require ceasing the action itself, not changing who gets to hit who with the stick.
Click to expand...
just a reminder to everyone here: rob roy thinks it is "polite" and reasonable" to hang signs which state that blacks are not allowed.

UncleBuck said:
what's the least aggressive way to kick someone out of your store based on their skin color?
Click to expand...
Rob Roy said:
It would be polite and reasonable to remind any person first that they are uninvited on private property.
Click to expand...
 
researching

researching

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
People, of all colors and both genders, are at an advantage or disadvantage according, primarily, to the economic class in which they reside. If you're poor, you have less opportunities than you would if you were rich. But being white, and specifically male, gives you an advantage that those who are not born white or male can enjoy. As a white male born on the lower end of middle class, my life hasn't been what I would call easy, so I can only imagine ( = Don't Know ) what a black person or other minority in this country has had to face. That's why when some people complain about social programs benefitting the unfortunate, I know it comes from a place of entitlement growing up in a world full of privilege.
Click to expand...
Then you don't know shit. More like ASSume you know. But you self loathing, guilt laden white liberals FEEL that way.o_O
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top