So what do we do now with the "refugees"?

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
Quote one single time I've been wrong about anything
With very few exceptions, just about every conclusion you've ever posted. I won't even go into how mercilessly boring you are, but it's fair to say I haven't seen all of them because I skip right past your walls of text. You sir, are an artist, and your mediums appear to be ignorance and naïveté.
 

bearkat42

Well-Known Member
With very few exceptions, just about every conclusion you've ever posted. I won't even go into how mercilessly boring you are, but it's fair to say I haven't seen all of them because I skip right past your walls of text. You sir, are an artist, and your mediums appear to be ignorance and naïveté.


That is exactly something a narcissist would say.
How NOT to answer a question - 101.
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
How NOT to answer a question - 101.
Again, and I can't stress this enough, I run this motherfucker up in here and I alone, shall be making those judgement calls. Both those answers were excellent and 100 points will be awarded to Gryffindor.
 

Wavels

Well-Known Member
I like the idea of confining the "refugees" in Gitmo...there are lots of vacancies at the moment.
Certainly, I would not lock them up...let them enjoy the nice weather and relative tranquility.

Why are the able bodied, young, unattached, male refugees not staying in Syria to fight for their country?
Why are they running away in such numbers?
 

pnwmystery

Well-Known Member
I like the idea of confining the "refugees" in Gitmo...there are lots of vacancies at the moment.
Certainly, I would not lock them up...let them enjoy the nice weather and relative tranquility.

Why are the able bodied, young, unattached, male refugees not staying in Syria to fight for their country?
Why are they running away in such numbers?
You're not familiar with the history and politics of Syria, or the current situation, are you? Because I can think up a few reasons why they'd flee.
 

pnwmystery

Well-Known Member
Wtf are you on about? I said the argument you made was logical. That's awesome that neighboring countries are taking them in, that's the most convenient place for them to set up camps. And yes, if the reason they're fleeing and asking for asylum is war, then the very instant the war is over, they need to move the camps back into their own country.

The state of their infrastructure is irrelevant, they aren't being taken in because their village/district/city/neighborhood is demolished and that certainly is no reason for their continued presence. The "I don't want to live in a makeshift shelter in my own country" argument doesn't float. If your life isn't in immediate danger from armed combatants, the rest of it can be handled by aid packages and a great deal of rebuilding by these peaceful folk. No reason to fly them here and then have to fly them back. You can keep them relatively close and politely usher them back asap
I see where you're coming from. Unfortunately where do you move back to once the war is over and your home and infrastructure destroyed? Live on the streets? Set up shante towns?
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
I see where you're coming from. Unfortunately where do you move back to once the war is over and your home and infrastructure destroyed? Live on the streets? Set up shante towns?
No doubt it will be an uphill climb. And I'm sure we will donate an overwhelming amount of support and financial aid. However, what we don't do is grant permanent residence to all the people who are unhappy with the living conditions of their country. If that were the case, half the world would be here tomorrow. They built those cities/towns/villages from nothing once before. If they want it bad enough, they'll do it again.
 

pnwmystery

Well-Known Member
No doubt it will be an uphill climb. And I'm sure we will donate an overwhelming amount of support and financial aid. However, what we don't do is grant permanent residence to all the people who are unhappy with the living conditions of their country. If that were the case, half the world would be here tomorrow. They built those cities/towns/villages from nothing once before. If they want it bad enough, they'll do it again.
We don't do that anyways; check our refugee and immigration laws.
 
Last edited:

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
I see where you're coming from. Unfortunately where do you move back to once the war is over and your home and infrastructure destroyed? Live on the streets? Set up shante towns?

What ever gets set up or however they live, has to be over there or you leave that pile of rubble to the bad guys to rebuild and keep.
 

Uncle Ben

Well-Known Member
Quote one single time I've been wrong about anything
Excuse me? I find nothing correct in any of your posts. You live in a bullshit fantasy land and have a big ego to boot. You really think you're twisted view of the world and your turbo posting threads at this collection of left wing freaks is going to do you any good?

Get a life......
 

potroastV2

Well-Known Member
heehee, that's a really good one!

You should say that while looking in the mirror, because that's what many people think about your redneck, racist postings. You've proven that you are clueless about what is actually happening around you, and the shit you post is hilarious because of it's stupidity.

Thanks for that, you just made my morning! :lol: :lol: :lol:

:mrgreen:
 

Uncle Ben

Well-Known Member
heehee, that's a really good one!

You should say that while looking in the mirror, because that's what many people think about your redneck, racist postings. You've proven that you are clueless about what is actually happening around you, and the shit you post is hilarious because of it's stupidity.

Thanks for that, you just made my morning! :lol: :lol: :lol:

:mrgreen:
Are you thru with the Name Calling or general rude behavior...... Buckie?
 

Not GOP

Well-Known Member
Sounds like a lame attempt to promote white guilt. And just because somebody is white, that doesn't necessarily mean their ancestors were here since before the nation's founding. If Muslims had settled America instead, there would be no Native Americans. They would all be dead and made into a lampshade by now.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Sounds like a lame attempt to promote white guilt. And just because somebody is white, that doesn't necessarily mean their ancestors were here since before the nation's founding. If Muslims had settled America instead, there would be no Native Americans. They would all be dead and made into a lampshade by now.
Muslims did settle America, dipshit. Muslim Europeans from Spain came right alongside Christians in the 15th century
 
Top