MrStickyScissors
Well-Known Member
The Articles of Confederation invested the greatest power in the individual states and left the national government weak and powerless. (Points : 1) True
False
False
1. Sanders has a net worth of $700K - hardly "poor"I don't get it. Why would somebody vote for a poor, life long loser like Bernie? Is that the path you really want America to go down? Let's all follow a leader with no skill and no talent? At some point, we are all going to have to vet the guy. You know?
Just don't go blaming me for your shit getting deleted or Yessica being banned. I'm grown enough to handle the internet without running to the mod reporting people. Not my style. I rather talk shit to you and see how far I can go until rolli puts me in slowdown, For the record I get my shit deleted too, but this the internet so I really don't give a fuck.42k is starting pay. I'm nowhere near management. I'm a 25 year old retard. By the time I wrap a few things, in a few years I'll easily be making twice that. Unless Bernie is president, then who knows what? I'm not going to hate on you for having a wife, I just hope she knows you have some serious mental problems. Just because you don't talk to the ladies, that doesn't mean I don't. Go ahead and keep hatin' (because hatin is what you do) I'll talk to as many women as I want, whether it's some chic at the supermarket, or a friend on facebook. Doesn't matter. I'm not ready to settle down yet.
I don't think you're paying any attention to poll numbers and reading headlinesLol who wants to bet Bernie is the next to bow down after Jed Bernie is getting smoked by Hillary and trump is laughing to the oval office Bernie is next to bow out shortly
700k is peanuts, and he aquired all of it through power of office. He has never created a single service or product that anybody has ever wanted, or needed. Everything he has accomplished has been through power of government. So of course he wants more of it. You would think Bernie, a man who's family came to America to escape Socialism, would be more appreciative of what America has to offer.1. Sanders has a net worth of $700K - hardly "poor"
2. Personal net worth isn't a reliable indicator of a presidential term. For example, Lincoln was one of the poorest presidents to hold office but regularly tops the list of most successful presidents in American history. Likewise, W. Bush, Nixon, Harding, Buchannan, Polk, Taft & others were all wealthy men with much higher personal net worths who had largely forgettable (aside from W.s catastrophe) terms as president
People support Sanders because his policy positions help the poor and middle-class at a time when the only section of American society that has economically prospered as a whole for the past 40 years is the upper-class
It's obvious you're trying to use arguments that correlate with your support for Trump, but like I told you before, the things you think are important for a president to have to have a successful administration aren't a good indicator of how successful the administration will be. Address my point about Lincoln; best president in American history, also one of the poorest. According to your reasoning, Lincoln should have been a shit president because he was poor as dirt, so what gives? W. had tens of millions of dollars before he became president and his administration is near the bottom of the list in terms of success, again, what gives?700k is peanuts, and he aquired all of it through power of office. He has never created a single service or product that anybody has ever wanted, or needed. Everything he has accomplished has been through power of government. So of course he wants more of it. You would think Bernie, a man who's family came to America to escape Socialism, would be more appreciative of what America has to offer.
That's not what I'm doing. And Bush aquired his wealth through family. The Bush dynasty is big in Texas. Don't they own a baseball team? I'm not impressed with G.W's background either, and I'm not making the point that Trump is the only answer, but instead, we have been seeing what inexperienced presidents bring to the table. Even today, with Obama the community organizer. Lincoln was a different time with different problems.It's obvious you're trying to use arguments that correlate with your support for Trump,
How many economists have endorsed Trump (or any other GOP candidates)?That's not what I'm doing. And Bush aquired his wealth through family. The Bush dynasty is big in Texas. Don't they own a baseball team? I'm not impressed with G.W's background either, and I'm not making the point that Trump is the only answer, but instead we have been seeing what inexperienced presidents bring to the table. Even today, with Obama the community organizer. Lincoln was a different time with different problems.
Right now we desperately need a president who knows what makes the economy move from experience. Both the successful side, and unsuccessful. Whether it's learning from a multi-billionaire with a few failed projects, or not. We need an experienced president who has learned from both good decisions, and bad
Many of those economists are the same people who support Obama's failed economic policies. You don't seriously believe the real unemployment number is below 5%, do you? If so, this entire conversation is pointless.How many economists have endorsed Trump (or any other GOP candidates)?
170 Economists have endorsed Sanders' plan
Nobel Laureates in economics are on that listMany of those economists are the same people who support Obama's failed economic policies. You don't seriously believe the real unemployment number is below 5%, do you? If so, this entire conversation is pointless.
I believe Bernie has a good heart, with noble intensions. It's part of his appeal, but thats also where it ends. Rhetoric will only get a candidate so far
Nobel prizes are selected by a small committee of socialist Norwegians. There is nothing special about that. Obama won the Nobel Peace prize for sneezing. He did absolutely nothing to deserve it.Nobel Laureates in economics are on that list
Have any Nobel Laureates in economics endorsed Trump's plan?
You seem to think Trump's plan (the same as all other GOP candidates before him - reduce taxes on the rich and cut social welfare programs) will work based on.. what exactly? His word? Who in the field of economics supports his, or any other GOP candidates, economic plan? If nobody does, then why would you believe that it would be successful? What do you base that on?
you make 42 a year.700k is peanuts
i will note that you are stupid.Trump is the only one talking about the trade imbalance. Putting tariffs on imports will bring back jobs and industry. He is a builder and understands management, construction, negotiation and he is the smartest guy around. He has good instincts and I trust his judgment.
That's ignorantNobel prizes are selected by a small committee of socialist Norwegians. There is nothing special about that.
Where did you get the idea that his plan raises taxes?There are several other elements in play, yet you only seem to consider two issues in regards to the success of Trump's economic plan. Taxes on the rich, and social welfare programs. First of all, Trump is raising taxes on a lot of rich people, including hedge fund operators. Second, which social welfare plans are you worried about Trump cutting? And please don't tell me it's because he supports planned parenthood, but opposes partial birth abortions.