Starting Temples

bluntmassa1

Well-Known Member
So do you agree or disagree that a mexican like finshaggy can never be hindu?
Finshaggy is white I believe his mom sure is anyway and not too bad looking. But I think he should go to India and be an actual Hindu before starting a temple he could never afford certainly not off the weed he grows. Lol, I almost think he may just be the worst grower on earth maybe them Hindus can teach him how to grow a fucking plant too.
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
Hebrew Israelites V Jewish People

Hebrew Israelites V Jahovah's Witnesses

Hebrew Israelites V Mormons
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
Oppression of Hindus by the United States
http://www.scribd.com/doc/271997415/Hindu-Brief#scribd
http://www.scribd.com/doc/270436023/Somic-Shilpa-Shastras
The drug laws (the Controlled Substances Act) are in violation of the Free Exercise Clause of the Constitution, similar to how it violates this same Clause in Native American and Santo Diame cases. It is also possible the act violate the 21st Amendment, which legalized not alcohol or fermented drinks, but all intoxicating liquors, and by the definition of intoxicating liquor, Bhang is an intoxicating liquor (The Controlled Substances Act was written when it was found that the Marijuana Tax act violated the Fifth Amendment and was overturned, the Controlled Substances Act may need to be overturned due to 21st Amendment violations). There are very few Supreme Court cases involving the 21st Amendment, and no one has ever brought up to the Supreme Court the point that the 21st Amendment legalizes intoxicating liquors. The 21st Amendment was ratified in 1933 The drug laws at that time were based on the Harrison Narcotics Tax act, which did not make narcotics illegal but taxed them and limited importation from foreign countries. Around this time most every drug could be bought at a Drug store, and much of the time it would be in syrup form and mixed with Soda. This is where Coca-Cola comes from, which was originally made with the Coca leaf.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Forty_Barrels_&_Twenty_Kegs_of_Coca-Cola
+
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonzales_v._O_Centro_Espirita_Beneficente_Uniao_do_Vegetal
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, 573 U.S. _ (2014)
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/13-354_olp1.pdf
"It held that the Greens’ businesses are “persons” under RFRA, and that the corporations had established a likelihood of success on their RFRA claim because the contraceptive mandate substantially burdened their exercise of religion and HHS had not demonstrated a compelling interest in enforcing the mandate against them; in the alternative, the court held that HHS had not proved that the mandate was the “least restrictive means” of furthering a compelling governmental interest.
In order to ensure broad protection for religious liberty, RFRA provides that “Government shall not substantially burden a person’s exercise of religion even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability.” §2000bb–1(a).2 If the Government substantially burdens a person’s exercise of religion, under the Act that person is entitled to an exemption from the rule unless the Government “demonstrates that application of the burden to the person—(1) is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest; and (2) is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest.” §2000bb–1(b)
Following our decision in City of Boerne, Congress passed the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIPA), 114 Stat. 803, 42 U. S. C. §2000cc et seq. That statute, enacted under Congress’s Commerce and Spending Clause powers, imposes the same general test as RFRA but on a more limited category of governmental actions. See Cutter v. Wilkinson, 544 U. S. 709, 715–716 (2005). And, what is most relevant for present purposes, RLUIPA amended RFRA’s definition of the “exercise of religion.” See §2000bb–2(4) (importing RLUIPA definition).
Before RLUIPA, RFRA’s definition made reference to the First Amendment. See §2000bb– 2(4) (1994 ed.) (defining “exercise of religion” as “the exercise of religion under the First Amendment”). In RLUIPA, in an obvious effort to effect a complete separation from First Amendment case law, Congress deleted the reference to the First Amendment and defined the “exercise of religion” to include “any exercise of religion, whether or not compelled by, or central to, a system of religious belief.” §2000cc–5(7)(A). And Congress mandated that this concept “be construed in favor of a broad protection of religious exercise, to the maximum extent permitted by the terms of this chapter and the Constitution.” §2000cc– 3(g)."
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
About 40 years ago, the Supreme court ruled that an Employer could refuse to hire a Native American on the discriminatory basis of Peyote/Mescaline in their urine. They ruled that if they let Natives do religious peyote ceremonies, then go to work sober but fail a drug test and then have Religious protection in the employment contract, they would supposedly be "Making every man a law unto himself".

But now, they made a ruling that Religious Companies (which are considered people) can make decisions about what their people can and can not put in their body. And they can refuse to obey laws on the basis of Religious belief Regardless of if the belief is "central to or compelled by, a system of Religious belief" meaning it does not have to be part of an Ancient text, just part of your modern belief.

So, what if there is a Native American organization that feels like people that work for them should take peyote, even if they are not Natives? Or what if a Marijuana Dispensary has religious convictions that say they should all smoke at work? They have the same protections that the Christians in Burwell V Hobby Lobby had when they said that they believe contraceptives kill souls, which is not in any Religious book.
 

bluntmassa1

Well-Known Member
About 40 years ago, the Supreme court ruled that an Employer could refuse to hire a Native American on the discriminatory basis of Peyote/Mescaline in their urine. They ruled that if they let Natives do religious peyote ceremonies, then go to work sober but fail a drug test and then have Religious protection in the employment contract, they would supposedly be "Making every man a law unto himself".

But now, they made a ruling that Religious Companies (which are considered people) can make decisions about what their people can and can not put in their body. And they can refuse to obey laws on the basis of Religious belief Regardless of if the belief is "central to or compelled by, a system of Religious belief" meaning it does not have to be part of an Ancient text, just part of your modern belief.

So, what if there is a Native American organization that feels like people that work for them should take peyote, even if they are not Natives? Or what if a Marijuana Dispensary has religious convictions that say they should all smoke at work? They have the same protections that the Christians in Burwell V Hobby Lobby had when they said that they believe contraceptives kill souls, which is not in any Religious book.
Do you really need to cut and paste the same shit on every thread?

Reported too much Spam not enough eggs.
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
This research will be done in the Temple as an Oblation to the God Surya

Solar Technology
http://www.nsf.gov/news/special_reports/science_nation/sprayonsolar.jsp
http://inhabitat.com/hypersolar-increases-solar-efficiency-by-300-with-magnifying-film/
"Alexandre Edmond Becquerel created the world's first photovoltaic cell in 1839. In this experiment, silver chloride was placed in an acidic solution and illuminated while connected to platinum electrodes, generating voltage and current. Because of this work, the photovoltaic effect has also been known as the "Becquerel effect". The Photovoltaic effect, a process in which two dissimilar materials in close contact produce an electrical voltage when struck by light or other radiant energy. Light striking crystals such as silicon or germanium, in which electrons are usually not free to move from atom to atom within the crystal, provides the energy needed to free some electrons from their bound condition. Free electrons cross the junction between two dissimilar crystals more easily in one direction than in the other, giving one side of the junction a negative charge and, therefore, a negative voltage with respect to the other side, just as one electrode of a battery has a negative voltage with respect to the other. The photovoltaic effect can continue to provide voltage and current as long as light continues to fall on the two materials. This current can be used to measure the brightness of the incident light or as a source of power in an electrical circuit, as in a solar power system."

Quantum Dots in Photovoltaics
http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/34814/InTech-Silicon_quantum_dots_for_photovoltaics_a_review.pdf
A quantum dot solar cell is a solar cell design that uses quantum dots as the absorbing photovoltaic material. It attempts to replace bulk materials such as silicon, copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS) or CdTe. Quantum dots have bandgaps that are tunable across a wide range of energy levels by changing the dots' size. In bulk materials the bandgap is fixed by the choice of material(s). This property makes quantum dots attractive for multi-junction solar cells, where a variety of materials are used to improve efficiency by harvesting multiple portions of the solar spectrum.

Dye-Sensitized Photovoltaics
http://www.e-renewables.com/documents/Solar/Dye-sensitized%20photovoltaic%20cells.pdf
http://krex.k-state.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/2097/12416/JeremyEssner2011.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y
A dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC, DSC or DYSC) is a low-cost solar cell belonging to the group of thin film solar cells. It is based on a semiconductor formed between a photo-sensitized anode and anelectrolyte, a photoelectrochemical system. The modern version of a dye solar cell, also known as the Grätzel cell, was originally co-invented in 1988 by Brian O'Regan and Michael Grätzel at UC Berkeley and this work was later developed by the aforementioned scientists at the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne until the publication of the first high efficiency DSSC in 1991.

Carrier Multiplication in Photovoltaics
http://ccccchem.uci.edu/~lawm/Generating%20Free%20Charges%20by%20Carrier%20Multiplication%20in%20Quantum%20Dots%20for%20Highly%20Efficient%20Photovoltaics.pdf
In solar cell research, carrier multiplication is the phenomenon wherein the absorption of a single photon leads to the excitation of multiple electrons from the valence band to conduction band. In the theory of a conventional solar cell, each photon is only able to excite one electron across the band gap of the semiconductor, and any excess energy in that photon is dissipated as heat. In a material with carrier multiplication, high-energy photons excite on average more than one electron across the band gap, and so in principle the solar cell can produce more useful work.

Colloids in Photovoltaics
https://books.google.com/books?id=bjvHECpuyvAC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Colloidal+Semiconductor+Nanowires:+Synthesis,+Quantum-confinement-effect+google+books&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CB0Q6AEwAGoVChMI0OOfh8PPyAIVCVOICh0VyQDq#v=onepage&q&f=false
Thiols in Photovoltaics
http://www.light.utoronto.ca/edit/files/publications/2008/barkhouse_2008_1.pdf
Nanocrystal Acid Treatments in Photovoltaics
https://zenodo.org/record/1133/files/post-deposition-Nanotechnology-revised2.pdf
Photoelectrochemical cells
http://gcep.stanford.edu/pdfs/hydrogen_workshop/MacQueen.pdf
Photoelectrochemical cells or PECs are solar cells that produce electrical energy or hydrogen in a process similar to the electrolysis of water.

Thermophotovoltaic Cells
Thermophotovoltaic (TPV) energy conversion is a direct conversion process from heat to electricity via photons. A basic thermophotovoltaic system consists of a thermal emitter and a photovoltaic diode cell.
http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~pbermel/pdf/Celanovic11.pdf
http://jxcrystals.com/publications/40PVSC_Fraas_Manuscript%207-21-2014.pdf
http://calhoun.nps.edu/bitstream/handle/10945/1170/04Jun_Davenport.pdf?sequence=1
Micro-Thermophotovoltaic Cells
http://serve.me.nus.edu.sg/shuchang/Publications/Latest%20papers%20for%20web/yang-chou-shu-li-xue-sensc%20(2003).pdf
Dual-Thermophotovoltaic Cells
http://cpb.iphy.ac.cn/fileup/PDF/2013-10-108402.pdf
Thermophotovoltaic Monolithic Interconnected Modules
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20030113048.pdf
Photovoltaic Design
http://www.uccs.edu/~rtirado/PV_Resources.pdf
Geometrical Photovoltaic design for shade tolerance
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1303/1303.4604.pdf
Photovoltaic Materials:

Amorphous silicon (a-Si) is the non-crystalline form of silicon used for solar cells and thin-film transistors in LCD displays. Used as semiconductor material for a-Si solar cells, or thin-film silicon solar cells, it is deposited in thin films onto a variety of flexible substrates, such as glass, metal and plastic. Amorphous silicon cells generally feature low efficiency, but are one of the most environmentally friendly photovoltaic technologies, since they do not use any toxic heavy metals such as cadmium or lead.
http://www.solarhome.ru/downloads/pv/a-Si_Advantages.pdf
Gallium arsenide (GaAs) is a compound of the elements gallium and arsenic. It is a III-V direct bandgap semiconductor with a zinc blende crystal structure. Gallium arsenide is used in the manufacture of devices such as microwave frequency integrated circuits, monolithic microwave integrated circuits, infrared light-emitting diodes, laser diodes, solar cells and optical windows.
http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy13osti/57902.pdf
https://mundaylab.umd.edu/wp-content/uploads/JournalOfPV_20121.pdf
Cadmium telluride (CdTe) is a stable crystalline compound formed from cadmium and tellurium. It is mainly used as the semiconducting material in cadmium telluride photovoltaics and an infrared optical window. It is usually sandwiched with cadmium sulfide to form a p-n junction solar PV cell. Typically, CdTe PV cells use a n-i-p structure.
http://www.ijcea.org/papers/290-A00012.pdf
 
Top