Palin faking birth of her new baby

FLoJo

FLoJo

Well-Known Member
has anyone seen the accusations that Palin had been faking her pregnancy and it was actually her 17 year old daughters? my girlfriend was doing some celeb surfing and noticed it...

pretty convincing if you check out the vids and photos

Stupid Celebrities Gossip Bristol Palin Pregnancy: Is VP Sarah Palin’s 5th Child Really Her Daughters? (Photos)

while not even close to a reliable source i dont have to be a doctor to look at her supposedly 7 months preggers, walking in heels and carrying no extra weight to start to wonder....
 
Johnnyorganic

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member
Wow! The left is desperate.

It would be a compelling story if true. Oprah worthy. A familiar story to many families who had a 'surprise' baby brother or sister. Unwed teen mothers have not always been acceptable in our society. This story would hearken back to those days. A time conservatives yearn for again. If true, it would be a testament to the sacrifices a mother would be willing to make for her children. It would also bear witness to the completeness of her conservative values.

If untrue: A lie from the left repeated in an attempt to discredit her.
 
GrowTech

GrowTech

stays relevant.
who cares. if she is, that's pretty honorable of her because perhaps her daughter doesnt want the media calling her some young pregnant slut.
 
FLoJo

FLoJo

Well-Known Member
if true i would most certainly not call it honorable.. i would view it as more of an attempt to help her political image and not seen as a bad mother who cant instill moral values in their children.. she uses the autistic baby as like a symbol of what a great a great person she is somewhat like what mccain does with his disabled child who he doesnt even parent.. if she was truly an honorable person she wouldnt care what the press said about he daughter and be truthful and accepting about the situation...

im sorry but it seems to me that you guys would praise the fact that she lied, if in fact it was true, and make her to be some kind of martyr or am i understanding incorrectly? i dont think there is a place for lying in politics especially when they will be having authority over us and our nation..

again this is totally speculation and no evidence has been shown to support these claims... interesting conversation either way
 
Johnnyorganic

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member
FLoJo said:
if true i would most certainly not call it honorable.. i would view it as more of an attempt to help her political image and not seen as a bad mother who cant instill moral values in their children.. she uses the autistic baby as like a symbol of what a great a great person she is somewhat like what mccain does with his disabled child who he doesnt even parent.. if she was truly an honorable person she wouldnt care what the press said about he daughter and be truthful and accepting about the situation...

im sorry but it seems to me that you guys would praise the fact that she lied, if in fact it was true, and make her to be some kind of martyr or am i understanding incorrectly? i dont think there is a place for lying in politics especially when they will be having authority over us and our nation..

again this is totally speculation and no evidence has been shown to support these claims... interesting conversation either way
Click to expand...
And you seem willing to accept it in spite of the fact you repeat that it may not be true.

If true, an example of a family relying on itself rather than looking to the government. This would make her more approachable because it is a story many Americans have seen personally.

If untrue. A lie meant to discredit her.

A lie. Bill Clinton lied about an affair with an employee. Hillary Clinton lied about missing FBI files. Obama lied about accepting Federal Election Funding. John Edwards lied about being a baby daddy. Joe Biden lied when he plagarized the words of another and claimed them as his own. Democrats appear to love liars.
 
FLoJo

FLoJo

Well-Known Member
i personally do not care if it is true or not... like i have said from the beginning i am debating both sides i a purely hypothetical manner. i have a sister who has 3 kids out of wedlock so its not really an issue to me.

i am also not talking about past politicians and their lies because obviously we know that the vast majority if not all of them lie and those events have come to our attention and have already passed.. the point of this topic is to discuss whether you think that is true or not and what if any effect it has on the way that you think about her.

unfortunately like celebrities politicians have to live their lives in the public eye and under our scrutiny but the difference is that politicians are accountable by their morals and character because we put more power into their hands unlike a celeb whos music we listen to or movies we watch.. we expect celebs to be stupid and morally lose for the most part but politicians are supposed to be the pillars of our society and the people who we can trust to make good decisions in our best interest and that we can trust.

my point is that if it is true what does that say about her character.. i personally think it makes me question her morals and ethics if it is true. if shes already lied she will continue to about more important issues that will make us question her character.

if its not true i agree it is something being put out to try and discredit her and question her running mates potential decision making.
 
Johnnyorganic

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member
fdd2blk said:
she should be at home taking care of her children.
Click to expand...
tipsgnob said:
so true.........
Click to expand...
FLoJo said:
i completely agree with that... i dont think she is a very fit candidate and purely being whored out as a publicity tool
Click to expand...
So much for the ability of a mother to work away from the home. No way for the father to look after the household while the wife secures a living for the family. Or both parents to work outside the home, like so many working families.

I always thought feminism was a fundamental Democratic principle. Denying a woman a livelihood because she is a mother seems to me to be a step backwards.
 
F

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
Johnnyorganic said:
So much for the ability of a mother to work away from the home. No way for the father to look after the household while the wife secures a living for the family. Or both parents to work outside the home, like so many working families.

I always thought feminism was a fundamental Democratic principle. Denying a woman a livelihood because she is a mother seems to me to be a step backwards.
Click to expand...




except he's not ........ :-|





 
FLoJo

FLoJo

Well-Known Member
nobody is saying that women should stay at home and do dishes and be suzie home maker but she should be staying at home when she has five kids, two in high school one in elementary and a new born... its one thing if all her children were grown and could take care of them selves but obviously she cares more about her career than her family which is a bad decision whether your a man or a woman. whats she gonna do split time between alaska and dc? not a very plausable option to maintain a good family life
 
ZenMaster

ZenMaster

Well-Known Member
FLoJo said:
nobody is saying that women should stay at home and do dishes and be suzie home maker but she should be staying at home when she has five kids, two in high school one in elementary and a new born... its one thing if all her children were grown and could take care of them selves but obviously she cares more about her career than her family which is a bad decision whether your a man or a woman. whats she gonna do split time between alaska and dc? not a very plausable option to maintain a good family life
Click to expand...
This is a stupid argument. Obama has two kids, he shouldn't be president if he has to raise them according to your argument.

This is typical. I'd rather hear reasons for her not to be VP based upon her actions in her political career and time as governor- if you are able to come up with any.
 
Johnnyorganic

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member
FLoJo said:
nobody is saying that women should stay at home and do dishes and be suzie home maker but she should be staying at home when she has five kids, two in high school one in elementary and a new born...
Click to expand...
This is hilarious. Mothers should be free to work outside the home, but not her.

FLoJo said:
its one thing if all her children were grown and could take care of them selves but obviously she cares more about her career than her family which is a bad decision whether your a man or a woman. whats she gonna do split time between alaska and dc? not a very plausable option to maintain a good family life
Click to expand...
So a mother should wait to enter the workforce only after their children are adults? Seems like discrimination against working mothers to me.

Which is it? Do mothers have the right to work outside the home or not?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top