This is demonstrable false.From the numbers I saw, Obama won in 2008 and 2012, he had a much higher turn out for voters compared to Hillary. People didn't really turn out as much for Hillary.
So, I think this just speaks as Hillary being the weak candidate, rather than an uprising of angry whites or whatever.
you just confirmed I was right ... answer this, why did more people vote for Obama than Hillary. racism?This is demonstrable false.
Hillary got more votes than any candidate in history except Obama.
You cant repeat talking points and think what you want of Clinton, but you cant argue with numbers.
What are you?Part 3 - 'I'm With Her'
This actually spoke to everyone and what it said was 'It's My Turn'..trust me, a self-serving elite, to take care of the working stiff <while stopping by Wall Street to pick-up speaking fees>..we later come to find the cheat she was capable of..if she cared about the party she would've shut DWS down..She would've told Donna Brazile she wasn't interested in those forum questions. It's called self-respect.
There's no 'I' in team.
Whoever came up with that slogan should have been fired.
'Make America Great Again' sounded much better to the electorate.
I disagree with the comparison. Trump is not a philanthropist and he is not nearly as wealthy and doesn't use his wealth to help people. He wants power but doesn't have it yet and no one differs to him about what to do with there money or country or economy. also what humility?Georgie boy didn't place his money properly. He also was warning about people like him !
The comparison to Donald Trump near the end is rich! My how time flies...
I disagree with the comparison. Trump is not a philanthropist and he is not nearly as wealthy and doesn't use his wealth to help people. He wants power but doesn't have it yet and no one differs to him about what to do with there money or country or economy. also what humility?
Soros is one strange dude. I'm not completely sure what you point is. One take away for me in the documentary is the corruption in the kleptocracy who claims what they are doing is legitimate because they are "only following the rules", yet that same group of ultra wealthy are in power and writing those rule. In this respect, Soros has company.I disagree, too, but it is because of the strange things Soros has done with his "philanthropy". However, that is something of a side issue relative to the rest of the interview/investigation in that report.
The point being, when looking at "what went wrong", Soros is another part of that equation.
do you hate jews as much as you hate muslims and legitimate climate research?I disagree, too, but it is because of the strange things Soros has done with his "philanthropy". However, that is something of a side issue relative to the rest of the interview/investigation in that report.
The point being, when looking at "what went wrong", Soros is another part of that equation.
Are you retarded? I don't use that word very often, but in your case, I think it might actually be true. I brought up the same issue in a different thread and you recited the same talking points yourself.This is demonstrable false.
Hillary got more votes than any candidate in history except Obama.
You cant repeat talking points and think what you want of Clinton, but you cant argue with numbers.
Wtf are you talking about?Are you retarded? I don't use that word very often, but in your case, I think it might actually be true. I brought up the same issue in a different thread and you recited the same talking points yourself.
The guy you're responding to already said what you said, that Obama won more votes. He won more than 7 million more votes than Clinton did. That means 7 million more people were excited to cast their vote for Obama than Clinton. Donald Trump performed worse than average and STILL fucking won. He had comparable numbers to Romney, Clinton's numbers were shit compared to Obama. I think it's pretty obvious you're simply in a state of denial about it because you can't accept that Hillary Clinton was a shitty candidate to run on the democratic ticket for many different reasons.
None of them being because she was a white woman. She failed on her own merits.
Now, will you and the democratic establishment continue to cry about it and pretend she lost because of sexism or racism and lose again in 2020 if we don't clean house by then?.. Probably.. But if I and the rest of the angry, frustrated, pissed off, actual progressive base who were right this entire election have anything to say about it, you won't.
i agree with most of what you are saying, except this. she did lose due to sexism and racism.pretend she lost because of sexism or racism
Dont agree with him without viewing the data.i agree with most of what you are saying, except this. she did lose due to sexism and racism.
I'd also argue that a lot of Hillary supporters thought she had it by such a wide margin that they either voted "something funny" (Hararmbe got 100k) or thought they didn't need to vote.
so if America elects a "black" president twice, but not a white women, its racist?? you are highi agree with most of what you are saying, except this. she did lose due to sexism and racism.
It's not racist, its racists voted for Trump.so if America elects a "black" president twice, but not a white women, its racist?? you are high
yeah, just ignore the data that shows that those with racist and sexist attitudes have a higher propensity to vote for trump.so if America elects a "black" president twice, but not a white women, its racist?? you are high