Say goodbye to a woman's right to choose

HAF2

Well-Known Member
Wal-Mart and Mcdonalds combined employ 1.5 million. We will find all these kids
jobs.
https://www.google.ca/amp/www.forbes.com/sites/clareoconnor/2014/04/15/report-walmart-workers-cost-taxpayers-6-2-billion-in-public-assistance/?client=safari

"Walmart’s low-wage workers cost U.S. taxpayers an estimated $6.2 billion in public assistance including food stamps, Medicaid and subsidized housing, according to a report published to coincide with Tax Day, April 15."

You were saying?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Good morning, professor dip shit!
Sorry I missed your salutation yesterday. I had to go and attend to some things.

I think if you are going to call me Professor Dipshit like it's a title, it would be more effective if you capitalized it. Thanks, Rude Sychophantic State Bag Lapping Person.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
A tolerant society humors their misfits and out-liers. But they are kind of a waste of time and resources.

You are half right Potato Man. Of course it's a waste of resources to control other peoples lives, but the State doesn't care because it is parasitic by its very nature and has no resources other than ones it has confiscated.
 

Justin-case

Well-Known Member
You are half right Potato Man. Of course it's a waste of resources to control other peoples lives, but the State doesn't care because it is parasitic by its very nature and has no resources other than ones it has confiscated.

Poor professor dipshit, plays the victim so well :cry:

Remember the time I caught you posting false propaganda on climate change?

What's it like to have a freshman make you look like an idiot in class, a bit embarrassing?


Screenshot_20170113-053440.png
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
People have a right to choose what happens in their own body. Not what happens in someone else's body. The fact that you can draw comparisons to taking away the abortion rights of someone to paying taxes makes me think you're disingenuous. There's a difference and if you can't see that, well that's just sad.

Your answer relies on your emotional point of view and doesn't address the inherent contradiction I pointed out in the way you view it.

In other words you never answered my question, you avoided it.

Obviously, people have a right to chose what happens to their body, which is why they ALSO have the right to chose what happens to the result of the labor of their own body.

What is the word....hmmm...oh yes, when a person cannot chose what happens with the results of the labor of their body...and other people make those decision using threats of force for noncompliance....the word....is...SLAVE.
 

Justin-case

Well-Known Member
Your answer relies on your emotional point of view and doesn't address the inherent contradiction I pointed out in the way you view it.

In other words you never answered my question, you avoided it.

Obviously, people have a right to chose what happens to their body, which is why they ALSO have the right to chose what happens to the result of the labor of their own body.

What is the word....hmmm...oh yes, when a person cannot chose what happens with the results of the labor of their body...and other people make those decision using threats of force for noncompliance....the word....is...SLAVE.

In your own mind, you've never been wrong, have you.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Poor professor dipshit, plays the victim so well :cry:

Remember the time I caught you posting false propaganda on climate change?

What's it like to have a freshman make you look like an idiot in class, a bit embarrassing?


View attachment 3888747

Interesting, but false.

??? Somehow I think you might be trying to say you've found some thing you believe is "evidence" I am / was a college Professor that posted erroneous info. ???

Nice try. But, please, keep trying though, in the meantime I'll smoke this Tahoe OG and scratch my hairy parts in amusement.
 

HAF2

Well-Known Member
Your answer relies on your emotional point of view and doesn't address the inherent contradiction I pointed out in the way you view it.

In other words you never answered my question, you avoided it.

Obviously, people have a right to chose what happens to their body, which is why they ALSO have the right to chose what happens to the result of the labor of their own body.

What is the word....hmmm...oh yes, when a person cannot chose what happens with the results of the labor of their body...and other people make those decision using threats of force for noncompliance....the word....is...SLAVE.
I addressed this. Three times. I said comparing the way one persons tax dollars is spent to the rights someone has over their own body is fucked up. Yeah it's an emotional response. Yours is an unemotional one. I answered your question to the best of my ability.
 

Justin-case

Well-Known Member
Interesting, but false.

??? Somehow I think you might be trying to say you've found some thing you believe is "evidence" I am / was a college Professor that posted erroneous info. ???

Nice try. But, please, keep trying though, in the meantime I'll smoke this Tahoe OG and scratch my hairy parts in amusement.

And that's why you didn't post for almost a week after I doxxed you, sure pal.

University of Saskatchewan agricultural department : challenge political ideas, hmmm.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
In your own mind, you've never been wrong, have you.
Conjecture.

Of course I've made mistakes, I'm a primate and primates make mistakes.

One quality I seem to have a greater abundance of than say the average slacker on RIU has, I often can easily point out the contradictions in another persons "argument". A few people seem to understand and appreciate it as a search for truth and we engage in a discussion, while many others recoil into their cognitive dissonance fueled defense responses. Guess which one you are?
 

Nugachino

Well-Known Member
Abortion should be allowed globally. So that we may rid ourselves of the Biebers, Trumps and other types of fucktards.

Also. No one really wants to keep a rape baby.
 

HAF2

Well-Known Member
Conjecture.

Of course I've made mistakes, I'm a primate and primates make mistakes.

One quality I seem to have a greater abundance of than say the average slacker on RIU has, I often can easily point out the contradictions in another persons "argument". A few people seem to understand and appreciate it as a search for truth and we engage in a discussion, while many others recoil into their cognitive dissonance fueled defense responses. Guess which one you are?
Comparing the labour a person’s body goes through to produce money that they pay taxes on; is not the same thing as comparing the rights someone has to having a medical procedure. You want to compare, try the same thing.
Prostate cancer checks, treatments and surgeries. They are paid for by personal insurance and in some cases socialized medicine. Like abortion. Why should the tax dollars of some go to pay for a procedure they don’t need? Comparing abortion and prostate cancer are the same ballpark. Do you see where I’m coming from on this now?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
I addressed this. Three times. I said comparing the way one persons tax dollars is spent to the rights someone has over their own body is fucked up. Yeah it's an emotional response. Yours is an unemotional one. I answered your question to the best of my ability.

No, it isn't. I've taken the consistent approach to individual freedom of choice and you have not. Your approach is embedded with contradiction.

Thank you for a having a reasonable demeanor in our discussion though.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Comparing the labour a person’s body goes through to produce money that they pay taxes on; is not the same thing as comparing the rights someone has to having a medical procedure. You want to compare, try the same thing.
Prostate cancer checks, treatments and surgeries. They are paid for by personal insurance and in some cases socialized medicine. Like abortion. Why should the tax dollars of some go to pay for a procedure they don’t need? Comparing abortion and prostate cancer are the same ballpark. Do you see where I’m coming from on this now?

Nobody should be forced to pay or labor for another persons upkeep.

I am not here to defend WHICH procedures some people should be forced to pay for others to have. I am questioning the idea that ANYONE should be forced to do anything but leave others alone unless they have made an explicit agreement otherwise, absent any duress.
 
Top