UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
sorry. doesn't work that way, nazi.If 50% responsible, then 50% say so.
sorry. doesn't work that way, nazi.If 50% responsible, then 50% say so.
you are the eternal victim.Then men should protest like all them women and refuse to pay a dime until it's50/50. If women are equal to men, then where are the feminists who are trying to make.this right?
Because it isn't about what's fair it's about who can leverage who and for how much. Women have the choice and stick men with the bill either way
Well, it will make that old black woman that live's in a trailer some extra cash,right?"Hey babe, you need to come see this! I'm at the top of the stairs"
https://www.google.ca/amp/www.forbes.com/sites/clareoconnor/2014/04/15/report-walmart-workers-cost-taxpayers-6-2-billion-in-public-assistance/?client=safariWal-Mart and Mcdonalds combined employ 1.5 million. We will find all these kids
jobs.
Sorry I missed your salutation yesterday. I had to go and attend to some things.Good morning, professor dip shit!
Sorry I missed your salutation yesterday. I had to go and attend to some things.
I think if you are going to call me Professor Dipshit like it's a title, it would be more effective if you capitalized it. Thanks, Rude Sychophantic State Bag Lapping Person.
A tolerant society humors their misfits and out-liers. But they are kind of a waste of time and resources.
You are half right Potato Man. Of course it's a waste of resources to control other peoples lives, but the State doesn't care because it is parasitic by its very nature and has no resources other than ones it has confiscated.
People have a right to choose what happens in their own body. Not what happens in someone else's body. The fact that you can draw comparisons to taking away the abortion rights of someone to paying taxes makes me think you're disingenuous. There's a difference and if you can't see that, well that's just sad.
Your answer relies on your emotional point of view and doesn't address the inherent contradiction I pointed out in the way you view it.
In other words you never answered my question, you avoided it.
Obviously, people have a right to chose what happens to their body, which is why they ALSO have the right to chose what happens to the result of the labor of their own body.
What is the word....hmmm...oh yes, when a person cannot chose what happens with the results of the labor of their body...and other people make those decision using threats of force for noncompliance....the word....is...SLAVE.
Poor professor dipshit, plays the victim so well
Remember the time I caught you posting false propaganda on climate change?
What's it like to have a freshman make you look like an idiot in class, a bit embarrassing?
View attachment 3888747
I addressed this. Three times. I said comparing the way one persons tax dollars is spent to the rights someone has over their own body is fucked up. Yeah it's an emotional response. Yours is an unemotional one. I answered your question to the best of my ability.Your answer relies on your emotional point of view and doesn't address the inherent contradiction I pointed out in the way you view it.
In other words you never answered my question, you avoided it.
Obviously, people have a right to chose what happens to their body, which is why they ALSO have the right to chose what happens to the result of the labor of their own body.
What is the word....hmmm...oh yes, when a person cannot chose what happens with the results of the labor of their body...and other people make those decision using threats of force for noncompliance....the word....is...SLAVE.
Interesting, but false.
??? Somehow I think you might be trying to say you've found some thing you believe is "evidence" I am / was a college Professor that posted erroneous info. ???
Nice try. But, please, keep trying though, in the meantime I'll smoke this Tahoe OG and scratch my hairy parts in amusement.
Conjecture.In your own mind, you've never been wrong, have you.
Comparing the labour a person’s body goes through to produce money that they pay taxes on; is not the same thing as comparing the rights someone has to having a medical procedure. You want to compare, try the same thing.Conjecture.
Of course I've made mistakes, I'm a primate and primates make mistakes.
One quality I seem to have a greater abundance of than say the average slacker on RIU has, I often can easily point out the contradictions in another persons "argument". A few people seem to understand and appreciate it as a search for truth and we engage in a discussion, while many others recoil into their cognitive dissonance fueled defense responses. Guess which one you are?
I addressed this. Three times. I said comparing the way one persons tax dollars is spent to the rights someone has over their own body is fucked up. Yeah it's an emotional response. Yours is an unemotional one. I answered your question to the best of my ability.
Comparing the labour a person’s body goes through to produce money that they pay taxes on; is not the same thing as comparing the rights someone has to having a medical procedure. You want to compare, try the same thing.
Prostate cancer checks, treatments and surgeries. They are paid for by personal insurance and in some cases socialized medicine. Like abortion. Why should the tax dollars of some go to pay for a procedure they don’t need? Comparing abortion and prostate cancer are the same ballpark. Do you see where I’m coming from on this now?