I don't see quotation marks, do you?So nothing but speculation and a seemingly made up quote so far?
I don't see quotation marks, do you?So nothing but speculation and a seemingly made up quote so far?
awwww, look at you. all jealous and whatnot.Why did they leave out his recently purchased beachfront home? He does own three homes now. Of course he technically owned three before that(they had a vacation home in Maine which they sold to buy the new one.)
http://www.snopes.com/2016/08/10/bernie-sanders-buys-summer-home/
remember when we had actual neo-nazis on the forum, and you were going around calling me racist while saying that they might be "possibly bigoted"?So again, just speculation and a made up quote.
I don't deny it could happen. Nothing has been presented that it will. Including your fake quote.
What bias and fallacy? Any reason why you won't be more specific?It's not completely factual, there may be some facts, with some bias and quite a bit of fallacy sprinkled in. Great reading to stir up the base.
Seen folks were puffing tough at the socal cup, what's Sessions up to?
"When"? Shit, I can call out at least a half dozen that post on the regular.....remember when we had actual neo-nazis on the forum
You do know that the vast majority of older people in America never attain this level of financial independence, right?https://www.fool.com/investing/general/2016/04/17/what-is-bernie-sanders-net-worth.aspx
Sanders owns a home in Vermont, and a home in Washington DC (as you would expect a Senator to have a home in the two places he physically lives). His net worth is estimated to be $800 thousand. My net worth is not quite half that... by the time I'm Bernie's age if I'm not worth several times what he is now, then I fucked up (or decided to go be a subsistent farmer in Bangladesh). If you live in the United States for over 60 years, are a white male with a college education, and you don't have mental illness or a serious addiction and you don't have a net worth of $800 thousand then you didn't have proper parenting or mentorship. Bernie is not a hypocrite, but should we punish the rich in a free country? I don't know, that is a different question. But the rich have no qualms punishing the poor....
That's 'shrivelry'...When the chivalrous swim in icy water?
Now for the hard part; how to go about fixing all this? I think we go after Citizens United first, by any means necessary.Christ where do you wanna start? Pay to play, religious test for candidacy, shitty educations, privilege, corporations are people, patriot acts, cowardice, war as a business model, capitalism/greed is good, shit let's not forget our self importance we're the greatest bestest country in the whole world!
Can you take on any specific argument in the article? You keep repeating that it's biased, you keep trying to discredit the headline, but you haven't talked about any of the substance of the article. Maybe you haven't read it?Read the article, I was very specific in one of my earlier responses, in fact you quoted me prior with specifics within that quote.
Do you think the article reads as a non-bias document of science, or something written to stir the base? It's hardly objective, cannabis cup is happening right now... Sessions isn't shutting anything down, not sure what more to read into that ~4month old article.
Missed the part in the article where they cite Trump as saying medical should happen, or some of the other appointing implications in other head spots in the admin, I'll let you dig up who those might be and how that might be a good sign for the movement.
If you are talking about this post I quoted, it's just a long-winded way of saying "he is hyperbolizing". I'm asking how is it hyperbole beyond the obvious bias or how likely are the actual scenarios he describes.hope you're not referring to the one that went right into terms like Trumpleskin etc, while they're funny they distract from any credibility, and that one I saw above was written in January.
That article is written like it was intended for Steven Colbert, it's intent was to entertain not to be objective and deliver anything of substance, it discounts and undermines every single human that moves further and deeper into their legal efforts in hopes to drum up views and clicks for chicken little types just my opinion
To me, the point being made is that IF Sessions decides to go after marijuana, there isn't much in the way to stop him. I don't see any real exaggeration in the basic argument and facts:How does the article come off to you?
Strictly factual, or are there exaggerations at any point?
Well, I changed his argument to a new headline. The arguments don't convince me Sessions will undoubtedly go after rec MJ, but I think it does give an insight into why he might and how effective he could be.I think you present a very credible and valid list of points, which the article failed to do..
Since 1980 to present, the GDP has continued to rise and Americans have benefitted from that all along- the top 10% has received 100% of it while the bottom 90% has received 0%You do know that the vast majority of older people in America never attain this level of financial independence, right?
And how are you supposed to save anything at all if you work a minimum wage job? You can't afford rent and food, let alone savings!
The wealthy in this country earn $500k+ per year and have a net worth of many times that. The ultra rich- .01%, or 1 in 10,000, earn nearly $30 million annually, yet these groups pay LESS tax than people making $50k/yr!
The top 10% now make over half of all the income earned and own well over 90% of all the wealth. That doesn't leave much for middle class folks (what's left of them) to retire on.
The American Dream has been crushed under the weight of corporate subsidies, giveaways, tax breaks and wage cuts- all of which are taken from the rest of us.
That's why the vast majority of older people in America are destitute.
It doesn't need to be this way. The rest of the developed world doesn't work like this and America shouldn't either.
What are the fallacies? I'd like to discuss.It's not completely factual, there may be some facts, with some bias and quite a bit of fallacy sprinkled in. Great reading to stir up the base.
Seen folks were puffing tough at the socal cup, what's Sessions up to?
Don't shoot the messenger?THen you've already sold short on a bunch of canna industry or you don't want to risk SEC charges? Do tell.