Republicans Don't Care if Trump Shoots Someone on Fifth Ave

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
tty and I aren't even agreeing on the facts.

Referring to the idea that two intelligent people can look at the same facts and disagree about what to do. I think we agree is that wealth and income has become skewed in this country to the point of degrading the well being of the majority of this country. Also that this is causing strife, in this country. Also that unlimited campaign donations give wealthy undue influence in DC. These are facts we can agree upon. They are available to analyse, discuss and verify.

Is what to do about that so clear? So many options but we can only pick a few. We can disagree about those.

There are unknown facts too. Is corruption endemic in Washington and nothing can be done without crossing palms? If so, then that affects what to do. If not then other courses of action might be open to us. We disagree that there is enough evidence of widespread corruption in the legal sense. And so, there are different solutions open to us.

I support Bernie's policies because they can solve the problem of undue influence from unlimited campaign financing from the wealthy. Ironically, if Washington is so corrupt that nothing can be done without paying officials off, then Bernie's solutions will not solve anything.
Nancy Pelosi has come out against universal healthcare. Someone had their facts wrong, and it isn't me.

Republicans voted again and again to repeal 'Obamacare' futilely, then when they had the power to actually do it they balked.

You're going to tell me with a straight face that Democrats- with the same donors- are somehow incapable of doing the same?

I wish you well in your delusions, but I won't share them.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Nancy Pelosi has come out against universal healthcare. Someone had their facts wrong, and it isn't me.

Republicans voted again and again to repeal 'Obamacare' futilely, then when they had the power to actually do it they balked.

You're going to tell me with a straight face that Democrats- with the same donors- are somehow incapable of doing the same?

I wish you well in your delusions, but I won't share them.
Nancy Pelosi hasn't come out against universal healthcare. Come on man, get your facts straight.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
tty and I aren't even agreeing on the facts.

Referring to the idea that two intelligent people can look at the same facts and disagree about what to do. I think we agree is that wealth and income has become skewed in this country to the point of degrading the well being of the majority of this country. Also that this is causing strife, in this country. Also that unlimited campaign donations give wealthy undue influence in DC. These are facts we can agree upon. They are available to analyse, discuss and verify.

Is what to do about that so clear? So many options but we can only pick a few. We can disagree about those.

There are unknown facts too. Is corruption endemic in Washington and nothing can be done without crossing palms? If so, then that affects what to do. If not then other courses of action might be open to us. We disagree that there is enough evidence of widespread corruption in the legal sense. And so, there are different solutions open to us.

I support Bernie's policies because they can solve the problem of undue influence from unlimited campaign financing from the wealthy. Ironically, if Washington is so corrupt that nothing can be done without paying officials off, then Bernie's solutions will not solve anything.
True to form in your density, your word vomit is Todd..also, you didn't answer my question.

What's it like to be a prisoner of your own mind?

When you go to Cheesecake Factory, how long does it take for you to decide what to order?
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
tty and I aren't even agreeing on the facts.

Referring to the idea that two intelligent people can look at the same facts and disagree about what to do. I think we agree is that wealth and income has become skewed in this country to the point of degrading the well being of the majority of this country. Also that this is causing strife, in this country. Also that unlimited campaign donations give wealthy undue influence in DC. These are facts we can agree upon. They are available to analyse, discuss and verify.

Is what to do about that so clear? So many options but we can only pick a few. We can disagree about those.

There are unknown facts too. Is corruption endemic in Washington and nothing can be done without crossing palms? If so, then that affects what to do. If not then other courses of action might be open to us. We disagree that there is enough evidence of widespread corruption in the legal sense. And so, there are different solutions open to us.

I support Bernie's policies because they can solve the problem of undue influence from unlimited campaign financing from the wealthy. Ironically, if Washington is so corrupt that nothing can be done without paying officials off, then Bernie's solutions will not solve anything.
Oh? Now you support Sanders? Does Bucky know? Have you told him yet?
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
True to form in your density, your word vomit is Todd..also, you didn't answer my question.

What's it like to be a prisoner of your own mind?

When you go to Cheesecake Factory, how long does it take for you to decide what to order?
LOL

Off the rails already? OK, I'll
No. I don't agree.

1+1..is there another answer other than 2?
There is no other answer other than 1 + 1 = 2

That is a fact.

Next question?
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Don't apologize to him.

You articulate well; you can't be held responsible for the denseness of those who read your posts, Tty.
They're stuck in their own viewpoints to the point where not only can't they see anything else but they'll shout down any alternatives.

This is called fanaticism. And they wonder why I've stopped taking them seriously.

What's funny is that they accuse others of blind fanaticism!
 
Top