UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
no, that's you. you remember all the times i've taken your exact words and turned them into a trump tweet, right?Now you're defending the Republican viewpoint as correct?
try doing the same for me.
no, that's you. you remember all the times i've taken your exact words and turned them into a trump tweet, right?Now you're defending the Republican viewpoint as correct?
Nancy Pelosi has come out against universal healthcare. Someone had their facts wrong, and it isn't me.tty and I aren't even agreeing on the facts.
Referring to the idea that two intelligent people can look at the same facts and disagree about what to do. I think we agree is that wealth and income has become skewed in this country to the point of degrading the well being of the majority of this country. Also that this is causing strife, in this country. Also that unlimited campaign donations give wealthy undue influence in DC. These are facts we can agree upon. They are available to analyse, discuss and verify.
Is what to do about that so clear? So many options but we can only pick a few. We can disagree about those.
There are unknown facts too. Is corruption endemic in Washington and nothing can be done without crossing palms? If so, then that affects what to do. If not then other courses of action might be open to us. We disagree that there is enough evidence of widespread corruption in the legal sense. And so, there are different solutions open to us.
I support Bernie's policies because they can solve the problem of undue influence from unlimited campaign financing from the wealthy. Ironically, if Washington is so corrupt that nothing can be done without paying officials off, then Bernie's solutions will not solve anything.
Pretzel word salad. Try actually thinking about what I just responded to.no, that's you. you remember all the times i've taken your exact words and turned them into a trump tweet, right?
try doing the same for me.
700 step flowchart for ordering parts in the military.Someone had their facts wrong, and it isn't me.
Nancy Pelosi hasn't come out against universal healthcare. Come on man, get your facts straight.Nancy Pelosi has come out against universal healthcare. Someone had their facts wrong, and it isn't me.
Republicans voted again and again to repeal 'Obamacare' futilely, then when they had the power to actually do it they balked.
You're going to tell me with a straight face that Democrats- with the same donors- are somehow incapable of doing the same?
I wish you well in your delusions, but I won't share them.
Now you're defending the Republican viewpoint as correct?
The very fact of Chump in office is the best thing that's happened to the Left in America in my lifetime.
True to form in your density, your word vomit is Todd..also, you didn't answer my question.tty and I aren't even agreeing on the facts.
Referring to the idea that two intelligent people can look at the same facts and disagree about what to do. I think we agree is that wealth and income has become skewed in this country to the point of degrading the well being of the majority of this country. Also that this is causing strife, in this country. Also that unlimited campaign donations give wealthy undue influence in DC. These are facts we can agree upon. They are available to analyse, discuss and verify.
Is what to do about that so clear? So many options but we can only pick a few. We can disagree about those.
There are unknown facts too. Is corruption endemic in Washington and nothing can be done without crossing palms? If so, then that affects what to do. If not then other courses of action might be open to us. We disagree that there is enough evidence of widespread corruption in the legal sense. And so, there are different solutions open to us.
I support Bernie's policies because they can solve the problem of undue influence from unlimited campaign financing from the wealthy. Ironically, if Washington is so corrupt that nothing can be done without paying officials off, then Bernie's solutions will not solve anything.
You know what's really funny?..Bucky has fallen into Putins trap of chaos and dividing us.Now you're defending the Republican viewpoint as correct?
This haiku sucks. Or was it a ballad?True to form in your density, your word vomit is Todd..also, you didn't answer my question.
What's it like to be a prisoner of your own mind?
When you go to Cheesecake Factory, how long does it take for you to decide what to order?
Oh? Now you support Sanders? Does Bucky know? Have you told him yet?tty and I aren't even agreeing on the facts.
Referring to the idea that two intelligent people can look at the same facts and disagree about what to do. I think we agree is that wealth and income has become skewed in this country to the point of degrading the well being of the majority of this country. Also that this is causing strife, in this country. Also that unlimited campaign donations give wealthy undue influence in DC. These are facts we can agree upon. They are available to analyse, discuss and verify.
Is what to do about that so clear? So many options but we can only pick a few. We can disagree about those.
There are unknown facts too. Is corruption endemic in Washington and nothing can be done without crossing palms? If so, then that affects what to do. If not then other courses of action might be open to us. We disagree that there is enough evidence of widespread corruption in the legal sense. And so, there are different solutions open to us.
I support Bernie's policies because they can solve the problem of undue influence from unlimited campaign financing from the wealthy. Ironically, if Washington is so corrupt that nothing can be done without paying officials off, then Bernie's solutions will not solve anything.
LOLTrue to form in your density, your word vomit is Todd..also, you didn't answer my question.
What's it like to be a prisoner of your own mind?
When you go to Cheesecake Factory, how long does it take for you to decide what to order?
There is no other answer other than 1 + 1 = 2No. I don't agree.
1+1..is there another answer other than 2?
A limerick.This haiku sucks. Or was it a ballad?
They're stuck in their own viewpoints to the point where not only can't they see anything else but they'll shout down any alternatives.Don't apologize to him.
You articulate well; you can't be held responsible for the denseness of those who read your posts, Tty.
Schuylard has never really made much sense.LOL
Off the rails already?
Coming from a guy who has a meltdown if anyone disses Bernard...They're stuck in their own viewpoints to the point where not only can't they see anything else but they'll shout down any alternatives.
This is called fanaticism.
He is because they continue to support him and apologise for him.Trump is not a Republican.
I know, you can't stand the idea of honest debate so you fling poo- anything not to have to actually think.Coming from a guy who has a meltdown if anyone disses Bernard...