Government claims it owns children, threatens 2nd mom with jail

[londonfog]

So you DID get aroused when your great Aunt with the old lady mustache kissed you ?

I only get aroused when your mother licks my butt hole. That shit does turn me when she does that trick with her fucking tongue. She made me promise to only allow her to lick my butt. I agreed.
Do you have a problem with calling me Dad one day ?

 

[Rob Roy]

I only get aroused when your mother licks my butt hole. That shit does turn me when she does that trick with her fucking tongue. She made me promise to only allow her to lick my butt. I agreed.
Do you have a problem with calling me Dad one day ?

Your wife was just telling me you were having problems, umm, "getting aroused" . I've done my best to console her.

 

[londonfog]

Your wife was just telling me you were having problems, umm, "getting aroused" . I've done my best to console her.

Well hell after fucking your moms and then your wife I am a wee bit drained. I guess I can stop fucking your wife. That freak is a tiger. I love her motto. ALL HOLES OPEN

 

[Chezus]

So exactly why are you trying to rationalize having sex with children?

 

[Rob Roy]

Well hell after fucking your moms and then your wife I am a wee bit drained. I guess I can stop fucking your wife. That freak is a tiger. I love her motto. ALL HOLES OPEN

So everybody, except your great aunt, wins now?

 

[Rob Roy]

So exactly why are you trying to rationalize having sex with children?

I'm not. As you know all of this started off as a generic conversation of what consent is and isn't and when it was actually given.

So, why do you have such skinny arms and hate the idea that other people are not your property ?

 

[Chezus]

I'm not. As you know all of this started off as a generic conversation of what consent is and isn't and when it was actually given.

So, why do you have such skinny arms and hate the idea that other people are not your property ?

Children cannot consent to having sex with adults. Stop trying to rationalize your past behavior.

 

[tangerinegreen555]

I'm not. As you know all of this started off as a generic conversation of what consent is and isn't and when it was actually given.

And your theory remains pathetic and pedophile sympathetic.

Works great at your NAMBLA meetings though, right?

 

[PCXV]

My point was more along the lines of where do you draw the line regarding other people deciding what you must do even if it means removing your choices over our own body ?

Who is responsible if a forced vaccination goes awry ?

Also it seems like you aren't concerned about causing pain to helpless beings, I find that a little disconcerting.

If a person is in the act of forcibly vaccinating you, do you have ANY right to resist ?

Currently, I don't think vaccinations are forced. The courts decided in the favor of the fathers informed consent iirc.

There is an argument for forced vaccinations in regards to preventing epidemics. Would you rather have one person have a reaction to a vaccine or have half the world die of a preventable epidemic? Who is responsible? I would say the nature of disease. But it seems if we inform people they will decide in favor of reason and most people will get vaccinated against the really bad stuff at least.

 

[curious2garden]

So you DID get aroused when your great Aunt with the old lady mustache kissed you ?

Tell us a few more stories of your youth, Abe.

 

[curious2garden]

I'm not. As you know all of this started off as a generic conversation of what consent is and isn't and when it was actually given.

So, why do you have such skinny arms and hate the idea that other people are not your property ?

No it did not. It started off with you claiming the Government claimed it owned children then when you were unable to support that hopping from straw man to straw man (or straw aunt in your case). Which explains a lot Abe.

 

[Rob Roy]

And your theory remains pathetic and pedophile sympathetic.

Works great at your NAMBLA meetings though, right?

Assuming you agree with your brethren..( Chezus, et al.)

Your rhetoric on the surface has the purpose of maligning me as it falsely assigns me a position I don't hold. Upon further examination though, it's easy to see how closely it aligns YOU to rapists etc.

You see, I've only ever advocated for people who DO have the capacity to consent to something being able to make their own choices based on mutual consent of the concerned parties.

You, on the other hand advocate for a policy which insists on removing a persons choice whether that individual has consented to the removal of their choice by another party or not. Which, of course is exactly what a rapist does, remove anothers choice under threat of force.

So, why do you align your beliefs with rapists ?

 

[Rob Roy]

No it did not. It started off with you claiming the Government claimed it owned children then when you were unable to support that hopping from straw man to straw man (or straw aunt in your case). Which explains a lot Abe.

I'll excuse your ignorance . What I was referring to was the line of ball busting regarding pedo this or pedo that which predates this thread.

So, do we agree that the government shouldn't own other people Matilda ?

 

[Rob Roy]

Tell us a few more stories of your youth, Abe.

You know if you repeat something false a bunch of times, it doesn't become true. You do realize that right, Matilda?

 

[Rob Roy]

Currently, I don't think vaccinations are forced. The courts decided in the favor of the fathers informed consent iirc.

There is an argument for forced vaccinations in regards to preventing epidemics. Would you rather have one person have a reaction to a vaccine or have half the world die of a preventable epidemic? Who is responsible? I would say the nature of disease. But it seems if we inform people they will decide in favor of reason and most people will get vaccinated against the really bad stuff at least.

I would rather that you owned your body and other people owned theirs.

Courts, as most presently exist now, are mostly theater and systemically flawed, since they lack the proper consumer feedback mechanisms that a free market court would have.

Who's responsible ? If you harm another person and it wasn't a result of a defensive action, good manners implies that you might owe them restitution.

Decide in favor of reason ? That's subjective, but I appreciate what you are trying to say there.

 

[Chezus]

You see, I've only ever advocated for people who DO have the capacity to consent to something being able to make their own choices based on mutual consent of the concerned parties.

And you have repeatedly insisted a 13 year old child can consent to having sex with an adult.

Which makes you a pedophile.

 

[Rob Roy]

And you have repeatedly insisted a 13 year old child can consent to having sex with an adult.

Which makes you a pedophile.

I think you might not be very bright. Even IF I insisted something external to me was possible, it doesn't provide evidence that I participate in that something now does it ? If it does, numbnuts, could you give an example ?

That would be like me saying you've observed dogs greeting each other by licking each others butts, therefore you are into animal sex and shit on the living rug.

 

[jizz pickle]

I think you might not be very bright. Even IF I insisted something external to me was possible, it doesn't provide evidence that I participate in that something now does it ? If it does, numbnuts, could you give an example ?

That would be like me saying you've observed dogs greeting each other by licking each others butts, therefore you are into animal sex and shit on the living rug.

Damn. You sound like a pedophile.

 

[Rob Roy]

Damn. You sound like a pedophile.

I'm not familiar with how they sound. Do you listen to them often ?

 

[jizz pickle]

I'm not familiar with how they sound. Do you listen to them often ?

Only when you post Abe.