Assange the rapist headed to face the music

TacoMac

Well-Known Member
Why didn't the attorney general cite his warrant when he said Assange's arrest was a 'priority'?
First off, he never said that at all. You, like all your other little fanboy idiots, make things up, take things COMPLETELY out of context and spew your bogus shit everywhere like it's a fact.

Stop reading your moronic headlines and actually read what Sessions said regarding Wikileaks.

The whole "RUMOR" you keep spreading was about the email hacking scandal and the Russian investigation. The quotes Jeff Sessions gave were over a year ago. Here is EXACTLY what Jeff Sessions said:

"We've already begun to step up our efforts and whenever a case can be made, we will seek to put some people in jail. We have professionals that have been in the security business of the United States for many years that are shocked by the number of leaks and some of them are quite serious, so yes, it is a priority."
People are already in jail.

Never once did he mention Assange. Never once was there any warrant for Assange. The latest to go to jail for leaking classified information was Reality Winner. She's going to do 2 years. 12 Russians have been indicted as well but will in all likelihood never stand trial. (they'll simply stay in Russia)

That's it.

So go back to your conspiracy cave with your other idiotic friends and tell each other what you want to hear, because obviously you're not the least bit interested in the truth.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
That doesn't mean Assange is not wanted

Like I said before, for anyone to claim Assange isn't wanted because of the information he's responsible for leaking is absurd. That's why he's wanted, not because he fled a warrant. If the warrant didn't exist, people like you and Buck would still want his head on a stake because you believe he is responsible for Donald Trump becoming president

Denying that fact makes your position weak
Can one not reasonably doubt your belief if there is nothing to verify your claims?
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Mr Assange has been confined to London's Ecuadorean embassy, where he has asylum, for almost five years.

Asked about the possibility of his arrest, Mr Sessions said: "We've already begun to step up our efforts and whenever a case can be made, we will seek to put some people in jail."


Earlier reports had suggested US authorities were preparing charges.

Wikileaks, which was founded by Mr Assange, has been involved in several high-profile releases of classified US information.
"This is a matter that's gone beyond anything I'm aware of," Mr Sessions told reporters.

"We have professionals that have been in the security business of the United States for many years that are shocked by the number of leaks and some of them are quite serious.

"So yes, it is a priority."

First off, he never said that at all. You, like all your other little fanboy idiots, make things up, take things COMPLETELY out of context and spew your bogus shit everywhere like it's a fact.

Stop reading your moronic headlines and actually read what Sessions said regarding Wikileaks.

The whole "RUMOR" you keep spreading was about the email hacking scandal and the Russian investigation. The quotes Jeff Sessions gave were over a year ago. Here is EXACTLY what Jeff Sessions said:

"We've already begun to step up our efforts and whenever a case can be made, we will seek to put some people in jail. We have professionals that have been in the security business of the United States for many years that are shocked by the number of leaks and some of them are quite serious, so yes, it is a priority."
People are already in jail.

Never once did he mention Assange. Never once was there any warrant for Assange. The latest to go to jail for leaking classified information was Reality Winner. She's going to do 2 years. 12 Russians have been indicted as well but will in all likelihood never stand trial. (they'll simply stay in Russia)

That's it.

So go back to your conspiracy cave with your other idiotic friends and tell each other what you want to hear, because obviously you're not the least bit interested in the truth.
Curious why you would leave out that critical bit in the beginning that proves the context.. Sessions was referring to Assange's arrest. Not "some people"

We both know why you did it
 

TacoMac

Well-Known Member
more conspiracy theory bullshit
You just proved what I said. He never mentioned Assange by name. He CLEARLY STATED that "some people" would go to jail, whoever that might be. They were NEVER TARGETING HIM SPECIFICALLY.

It's no different with any investigation when someone ask, "Is the husband a suspect?" and the police reply, "right now, we're looking at the evidence and we'll go where it takes us." That does NOT EQUAL, "Yes, the husband is our only suspect."

Go back to your conspiracy theory hole, asshat.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
You just proved what I said. He never mentioned Assange by name. He CLEARLY STATED that "some people" would go to jail, whoever that might be. They were NEVER TARGETING HIM SPECIFICALLY.

It's no different with any investigation when someone ask, "Is the husband a suspect?" and the police reply, "right now, we're looking at the evidence and we'll go where it takes us." That does NOT EQUAL, "Yes, the husband is our only suspect."

Go back to your conspiracy theory hole, asshat.
Deny it all you want, doesn't make a difference. You want Assange in jail because you think what he released helped Trump get elected. Maybe the people you support shouldn't do shady shit behind the scenes that leaves them vulnerable to leaks
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Again, there is only one warrant out for Assange. It is from the UK for jumping bail.

Nobody else wants him.
Nobody else cares.
Nobody else has any subpoenas, warrants, nothing at all.

Assange doesn't want to face two things: Jail for jumping bail and having to actually provide for himself now that he's going to be on his own and doesn't have a pot to piss in or a window to throw it out of.

That's why HE is making all this bullshit up: to get support from his idiot followers like you that blindly believe there's some sort of international conspiracy out to get him.

Fact is, nobody gives a fuck about him at all except the UK.
Of course the Federal Government of the United States cares.

Your assertion that such isn't the case just lays bare your misinterpretation of the situation.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Of course the Federal Government of the United States cares.

Your assertion that such isn't the case just lays bare your misinterpretation of the situation.
Have you ever thought of going back to school and getting a law degree so that you can use that Vulcan logic of yours to affect the course of history?
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Have you ever thought of going back to school and getting a law degree so that you can use that Vulcan logic of yours to affect the course of history?
Lol what makes you think that a law degree would make any difference?
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Lol what makes you think that a law degree would make any difference?
Get your degree, get your credentials to practice in court, maybe start up a Progressive(TM) type of ACLU, bring the evildoers to their knees and you'll be famous in no time.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Hey, how about that party that doesn't give a fuck about you or me, anyway?

You know, the one that completely ignores the fire, life and death needs of 90% of all Americans in its zeal to service that tiny minority that showers it with money?

How IS that working out for you, anyway?

Well, not worth a damn for me or anyone I know, so why should I be loyal to it?

Answer me THAT and you'll understand why I want a real alternative, not a fake competition where all the candidates in both sides are bought and paid for.

Cheer on your master's choice all you want- but don't whine at me for not going along with the charade.
The Republican party sucks. I can agree with you about that.
 
Top