Child killer goes to healing lodge.

Buddha2525

Well-Known Member
So then when white people like UncleBuck hate their own race it's holding restraint for their genetic superiority over you? Because saying white people who are white all have a privledge over you and access to everyday treatment, secret handshakes, etc for something that was 100% genetic lottery means according to using WHITE is the result of using that word.

If you don't mean that you're either stupid, racist, ignorant, fooled or mixture of those.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
So then when white people like UncleBuck hate their own race it's holding restraint for their genetic superiority over you? Because saying white people who are white all have a privledge over you and access to everyday treatment, secret handshakes, etc for something that was 100% genetic lottery means according to using WHITE is the result of using that word.

If you don't mean that you're either stupid, racist, ignorant, fooled or mixture of those.
What you posted is another example of the strawman logical fallacy. I said nothing of the sort.

You can ask a valid question and I'll answer but there is no need to respond to the crap you just vomited out of your dual purpose orifice.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
So then when white people like UncleBuck hate their own race it's holding restraint for their genetic superiority over you? Because saying white people who are white all have a privledge over you and access to everyday treatment, secret handshakes, etc for something that was 100% genetic lottery means according to using WHITE is the result of using that word.

If you don't mean that you're either stupid, racist, ignorant, fooled or mixture of those.
Because of the racially biased manner in which the death penalty was disproportionately applied to people of color, we should ban the death penalty for non white people

The death penalty should still apply to whites until parity is reached

Whites will scream for an end to the death penalty we’ll before parity is ever reached

Prove me wrong, canna sylvan. You kkkynes wannabe little bitch
 

Budley Doright

Well-Known Member
It was a ribald, non sequitur meant to break the somberness of the topic. I plead guilty to poor timing. Apologies.
You seem to be trying to project humour when there is nothing humorous about this thread. Read the transcript of her testimony and then project some more humour, very sad.
 

Quani

Active Member
You can ask a valid question and I'll answer but there is no need to respond to the crap you just vomited out of your dual purpose orifice.
Is that... poetry ? Thanks for the laugh, I am depressed so it helps me, like this thread :lol:
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
How the hell could this happen? Looks like a tourist resort. McClintic and her husband tortured and killed a sweet innocent little girl, Tori Stafford, and now she’s on her way to a healing lodge, WTF!!! Healing lodge??? She should be either dead or perpetually tortured, not so called healed. The people (natives) that run the lodge don’t even want her.
“We have no say on inmate selection, but I believe if our elders were still a part of the process maybe Ms. McClintic wouldn’t be at the healing lodge,” Francis said in the statement. Only in Canada :(. Ruined my fucking day and safe to say I’ll rethink my vote going forward.
a link would help your neighbors to the south who aren't familiar with this case.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
You seem to be trying to project humour when there is nothing humorous about this thread. Read the transcript of her testimony and then project some more humour, very sad.
You seem to be conflating an ill timed comment on my part into a lack of compassion on my part. Ironic, since many of my posts are all about compassion and I already stated I found the actions of the murderer unacceptable. If this is a serious thread, great. I'll apologize, again. Sorry to give the impression I took the subject matter of the thread lightly. I don't. Hard to tell sometimes. My mistake.



As an aside, at the start of the thread I did point out the irony of how manipulated people are to decry one kind of violence against innocents while endorsing other kinds on a regular and routine basis. The only difference is in one instance the "killer" is a nongovernment person and in the other murders they are government related murders and somehow seen as "necessary" or "not murder".

My regular observations and comments there often strike a cognitive dissonant chord within others who are indoctrinated to see those things as two separate kinds of events, when they aren't. They are both murder, yet most people support the kind they are instructed to believe isn't murder. So, please carry on, talking about how bad murder is, while also supporting systems (other people) who regularly use murder as an integral part of maintaining their system. Irony.
 

TacoMac

Well-Known Member
I had to read up on just who this is about.

Wow. Just wow.

Maybe if she had served 20 years, shown some remorse and the like, one could understand.

But this is an unrepentant person that hasn't served any stretch of time without incident.

She should be in the general population of prison until at least she serves 20 years without incident. She's not managed half that yet.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
I had to read up on just who this is about.

Wow. Just wow.

Maybe if she had served 20 years, shown some remorse and the like, one could understand.

But this is an unrepentant person that hasn't served any stretch of time without incident.

She should be in the general population of prison until at least she serves 20 years without incident. She's not managed half that yet.
i gotta read this later..
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Because of the racially biased manner in which the death penalty was disproportionately applied to people of color, we should ban the death penalty for non white people

The death penalty should still apply to whites until parity is reached

Whites will scream for an end to the death penalty we’ll before parity is ever reached

Prove me wrong, canna sylvan. You kkkynes wannabe little bitch
if it were whites only then it would come off the table pretty quick..mom..i just got a job at IBM mom..mom someone who i've never met has accused me of sexual assault mom, mom what do i do mom..mom what do i do mom?
 

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
Are you posting from Quebec today?

Also that's a retarded argument my frozen neighbor.

" “If you don’t like it, leave,” is but the latest example in a long line to have permeated social media. Nevertheless, this opinion, popular in the wake of the Baltimore riots, demands debunking. It is phrases like this that divide countries when they need unity most. And, often, it is phrases like this that run antithetical to liberal democracy.

...
To command that if one is not aligned with the political climate of a country, they should leave is ridiculous. It is this very idea that the United States’ Founding Fathers sought to eradicate, and this is the same idea that has failed time after time in a modern context.

Do not accede to unsubstantiated political domination. You, as a person, are entitled to certain unalienable rights, and chief amongst these is that you as a person have a right to political consciousness. Violence is never optimal; if in our attempts to control it we sacrifice the ability for political discourse"

https://www.thegazelle.org/issue/66/opinion/tom

Fallacy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ergo_decedo
Your frozen neighbor is Altaic.
 

Budley Doright

Well-Known Member
Are you posting from Quebec today?

Also that's a retarded argument my frozen neighbor.

" “If you don’t like it, leave,” is but the latest example in a long line to have permeated social media. Nevertheless, this opinion, popular in the wake of the Baltimore riots, demands debunking. It is phrases like this that divide countries when they need unity most. And, often, it is phrases like this that run antithetical to liberal democracy.

...
To command that if one is not aligned with the political climate of a country, they should leave is ridiculous. It is this very idea that the United States’ Founding Fathers sought to eradicate, and this is the same idea that has failed time after time in a modern context.

Do not accede to unsubstantiated political domination. You, as a person, are entitled to certain unalienable rights, and chief amongst these is that you as a person have a right to political consciousness. Violence is never optimal; if in our attempts to control it we sacrifice the ability for political discourse"

https://www.thegazelle.org/issue/66/opinion/tom

Fallacy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ergo_decedo
I shouldn’t have to point out that retarded is a stupid word and not used in mainstream any more, if so enlightened. And Rob is against all forms of government that tax it’s citizens and jail them for not obeying its laws correct? So in that context he should leave and start his own utopian civilization, is this not so? And yes lots in Quebec are not happy and are IMO more than welcome to leave Canada if the majority chooses, you have issue with that? Also I’m sure Rob appreciates your coming to his defence and I’m sure he thanks you for that lol.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
I shouldn’t have to point out that retarded is a stupid word and not used in mainstream any more, if so enlightened. And Rob is against all forms of government that tax it’s citizens and jail them for not obeying its laws correct? So in that context he should leave and start his own utopian civilization, is this not so? And yes lots in Quebec are not happy and are IMO more than welcome to leave Canada if the majority chooses, you have issue with that? Also I’m sure Rob appreciates your coming to his defence and I’m sure he thanks you for that lol.

When you say "tax it's citizens" you are providing an example of how you believe in two opposing things at once.

You seem distraught over the violence shown to an innocent child. That's commendable.

You seem okay with using violence against neutral innocent people in other instances though. That's contradictory, and not commendable.

If you like violence so much as a means to achieve your goals, why do you get mad at the child raping lady, for using the same means (initiatory violence) you turn a blind eye to when it is done on a larger scale by your taxing dictatorial overlords?

I am against initiatory violence, you are some of the time, but not other times. Can you explain your confusion or would you rather resort to platitudes as a poor substitute for a rational argument?
 
Top