yes
are you saying men and women have only worked together since 1979?
You're wrong.
Men and women did different jobs almost exclusively until the 20th century. There was some overlap, but not much.
are you describing christians?
because muslim people never did the holocaust
You're right Muslims killed 80,000,000 Indians, not 6,000,000 Jews. You don't seem to give a fuck about India though because then you'd have to admit that Muslims have done terrible atrocities as well. What about Yemen? Kuwait? Syria? Afghanistan?Why does that pea-brain of yours think that by showing Christians have done shitty things, it means that Muslims haven't? DERPPPPPPPPP.....
Yep, you're defending Islam. Fun fact; a LOT of Muslims are anti-Semitic.It's very prevalent in the middle east. You're quite content to defend an ideology that wants gays killed, wants non-believers killed, wants women to have guardians and be covered from head to toe, and wants sharia law to be the defacto law of the world.What the fuck is wrong with you?
says the guy reciting racist pseudoscience from a cross burner
You don't fucking get it. Science doesn't care about your beliefs, as long as there's not false data put in. The terrible experiments done on Jews in the holocaust have been extraordinarily helpful in the treatment of things like hypothermia. The data is not invalidated because the people gather it were monsters. Even if Charles Murray was a white supremacist, which he isn't, it still wouldn't invalidate his data unless he was skewing results which there isn't any evidence of.
he says women wo wear makeup but dont want to be sexually harassed are hypocrites. he is apparently on some sort of crusade against birth control. he does speaking tours with a guy who says women who cant handle sexual harassment need to find a new job.
More 6 degrees of Kevin Bacon nonsense. People agreeing with you doesn't mean you share their views dummy.
Charles Mason loved the beetles; but that doesn't mean the Beetles endorse his views.
You just keep making logical fallacies in your arguments. It'd be kind of funny if it wasn't an indicator of your deep lack of understanding of basic logic.