Repirations for slavery

squarepush3r

Well-Known Member
census records make it super easy

remember skunkd0c? he was a nazi, like you, who i ran off this site. gotta give credit to @travisw for the assist in that one.

travisw found all of the guy's personal information and passed it along to me. i was on ancestry.com at the time for my own family history and decided to look him up. they all had the exact same name and surname dating back for centuries. the 1850 census showed that they had about 150 people at their little country estate at the time.

his family would have to fork over all their money in reparations. that simple. they got that money from slavery, now they have to give it back. census records would make it easy to track the families they enslaved as well.

the best part of it all was that his wife was a major liberal and skunkd0c was impotent or shooting blanks so his wife adopted a black baby. the look on his face in those facebook photos of him holding his new baby was fucking priceless.
what about Jewish slave owners, would you support the same policies for them? And also black slave owners?

Just checking if your system is actually logically consistent, or just another manifestation of your hate for white people.

Also the Arabic slave trade was (and is) many times larger, do you support the same for that?
 

Covetsculitvars

Well-Known Member
Welp what would have happened to them if we left them with the tribes that conquered them into slavery........do you think they would NOWADAYS be NFL! NBA! AND etc ex stars making millions to destroy the fabric of society with!
 

MidwestGorilla219

Well-Known Member
Welp what would have happened to them if we left them with the tribes that conquered them into slavery........do you think they would NOWADAYS be NFL! NBA! AND etc ex stars making millions to destroy the fabric of society with!
Just like the Irish and Italians (and many more), what makes you think they would not come here for a better life in the early 1900's?
 

Covetsculitvars

Well-Known Member
The Europeans had a choice brah! These folks in America were native tribes in Africa CONQUERED by another African tribe....maybe folks should read up on the lifestyles ESP back then when the Dutch trading company was down there.......these folks could expect to live under these new tribes!
You say this like the native Americans welcomed these scumbags to come take their lands ........you must have a public school system education!
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
The Europeans had a choice brah! These folks in America were native tribes in Africa CONQUERED by another African tribe....maybe folks should read up on the lifestyles ESP back then when the Dutch trading company was down there.......these folks could expect to live under these new tribes!
You say this like the native Americans welcomed these scumbags to come take their lands ........you must have a public school system education!
We’re you educated on stormfront or at trump university?
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
what about Jewish slave owners, would you support the same policies for them? And also black slave owners?

Just checking if your system is actually logically consistent, or just another manifestation of your hate for white people.

Also the Arabic slave trade was (and is) many times larger, do you support the same for that?
First establish the reasoning why some blacks owned slaves. Most cases were to keep a family together and not sold to the hands of some abusive slave master. 1924's Free Negro Owners of Slaves in the United States in 1830, "The census records show that the majority of the Negro owners of slaves were such from the point of view of philanthropy. In many instances the husband purchased the wife or vice versa … Slaves of Negroes were in some cases the children of a free father who had purchased his wife. If he did not thereafter emancipate the mother, as so many such husbands failed to do, his own children were born his slaves and were thus reported to the numerators. Benevolent Negroes often purchased slaves to make their lot easier by granting them their freedom for a nominal sum, or by permitting them to work it out. In other words, these black slave-owners, the clear majority, cleverly used the system of slavery to protect loved ones.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Lmao here come the libtards and the delusions the carry in their FANNY PACKS! Your comment liked by the two BIGGEST TWATS in the political section .........if roast beef wasn't so liberal your asses woulda been skidded years ago! I don't expect anything but Assinine Bullchit from anyone name buck,suds or papy!
Pointing fingers and trying to diminish others is a great debate tactic. You have me convinced, sir.

Did you really say that slavers and slave holders saved Africans?
 

Grandpapy

Well-Known Member
Lmao here come the libtards and the delusions the carry in their FANNY PACKS! Your comment liked by the two BIGGEST TWATS in the political section .........if roast beef wasn't so liberal your asses woulda been skidded years ago! I don't expect anything but Assinine Bullchit from anyone name buck,suds or papy!
I'm guessing in your world Skippy® invented Peanut Butter.
 

Grandpapy

Well-Known Member
Look at how ignorant and delusional this post he sent is! My gawd the Internet allows the Herpies sores of nations come here to frivolously argue their points of liberal circus acts.....

Welp what would have happened to them if we left them with the tribes that conquered them into slavery........do you think they would NOWADAYS be NFL! NBA! AND etc ex stars making millions to destroy the fabric of society with!


IN THE END NOONE CARES AND U LOSE! BOOM!
I Care.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
The Europeans had a choice brah! These folks in America were native tribes in Africa CONQUERED by another African tribe....maybe folks should read up on the lifestyles ESP back then when the Dutch trading company was down there.......these folks could expect to live under these new tribes!
You say this like the native Americans welcomed these scumbags to come take their lands ........you must have a public school system education!
True that warring African nations did sell captured prisoners to slavery. It is also known that the conditions of slaves in the Americas was not widely known at this time. African nations did keep prisoners as slave during war, but much different then the chattel slavery of the Americas. Slavery in Africa was often the product of conflict and war between tribes. Unlike in America, it was not based on race. Slaves in Africa were also not necessarily enslaved for life. It was not unusual for slave owners to assimilate their slaves into their family unit. African slavery still treated captured prisoners with some form of respect. In Americas the slaves became looked upon as inferior. No such thing as "buck breaking" in African slavery
 
Top