Trump bails out farmers on the American Taxpayer's dime

P

pikachuriu

Well-Known Member
doublejj said:
Schumer ain't president.....thump the crook is, lock him up.
When Schumer is president we'll talk.
Click to expand...
So you only oppose your President, even if the US Democrat legislators support him? Seriously?

You're too chicken to call out Democrats who approve of your Presidents policy? No wonder your country is so messed up.
 
doublejj

doublejj

Well-Known Member
pikachuriu said:
So you only oppose your President, even if the US Democrat legislators support him? Seriously?

You're too chicken to call out Democrats who approve of your Presidents policy? No wonder your country is so messed up.
Click to expand...
If your asking if the choice is democrats or thump?.....that's an easy choice. I'll take a flawed democrat over a crooked republican every time.
Next question
 
Last edited:
P

pikachuriu

Well-Known Member
doublejj said:
If your asking if the choice is democrats or thump?.....that's an easy choice. I'll take a flawed democrat of crooked republican every time.
Next question
Click to expand...
I didn't ask that. If Republicans and Democrats agree on a specific policy, you have stated it only matters to you if the Democrats are the President. No wonder your country is so messed up.

Be Best.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
doublejj said:
U mean like this place?.....I'm pretty sure they only participate in what they choose....
View attachment 4333440
Click to expand...

Your response doesn't refute my assertion though.


Your "why don't you move to Somalia" picture is a rationalization, essentially saying if government X doesn't force you, these scary Somali guys will. You argument caves in on that basis.

You see a warlord is behaving like he's the government and uses the exact same means as any "ism based government" , that you presumably support.

Human relationships are either based in voluntary participation or involuntary participation. Both the warlord and government use an involuntary means don't they? That was a rhetorical question, yes, they do.
 
doublejj

doublejj

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Your response doesn't refute my assertion though.


Your "why don't you move to Somalia" picture is a rationalization, essentially saying if government X doesn't force you, these scary Somali guys will. You argument caves in on that basis.

You see a warlord is behaving like he's the government and uses the exact same means as any "ism based government" , that you presumably support.

Human relationships are either based in voluntary participation or involuntary participation. Both the warlord and government use an involuntary means don't they? That was a rhetorical question, yes, they do.
Click to expand...
Dude there's some hills in Humboldt I wouldn't go into without a gun. Lawlessness is lawlessness. Participate as you wish and deal with the consequences. But it's called civilization for a reason. Have u ever read Lord of the Flies?
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
doublejj said:
Dude there's some hills in Humboldt I wouldn't go into without a gun. Lawlessness is lawlessness. Participate as you wish and deal with the consequences. But it's called civilization for a reason. Have u ever read Lord of the Flies?
Click to expand...

Everytime I hear about "the Lord of the Flies" , I think about that Aerosmith concert I went to in 1975 where Steven Tyler screamed "I am the looooord of your thiiiigggghhs" into a microphone while dancing around on a stage.

So the standard operating means of your preferred government, is an involuntary process, which is the same thing as the Somali warlords though, right? You're not debating that ?
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
pikachuriu said:
I didn't ask that. If Republicans and Democrats agree on a specific policy, you have stated it only matters to you if the Democrats are the President. No wonder your country is so messed up.

Be Best.
Click to expand...

It's almost like people chose a side and cheer for that side while ignoring the bigger picture. Lol.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
doublejj said:
Dude there's some hills in Humboldt I wouldn't go into without a gun. Lawlessness is lawlessness. Participate as you wish and deal with the consequences. But it's called civilization for a reason. Have u ever read Lord of the Flies?
Click to expand...
Actually lawlessness can be a good thing if the law itself is a bad thing. Think about a runaway slave who is breaking a law by "stealing himself" , he's being lawless, but is also doing the right thing.

I suggest not equating good and bad with legal and illegal, since they often are dissimilar and even opposing concepts.
 
doublejj

doublejj

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Everytime I hear about "the Lord of the Flies" , I think about that Aerosmith concert I went to in 1975 where Steven Tyler screamed "I am the looooord of your thiiiigggghhs" into a microphone while dancing around on a stage.

So the standard operating means of your preferred government, is an involuntary process, which is the same thing as the Somali warlords though, right? You're not debating that ?
Click to expand...
What u espouse is barbaric system, we banded together centuries ago to help each other survive and look out for our fellow man. It was called civilization. Those that wouldn't participate were banished.....do u feel like an outsider Rob?
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
doublejj said:
Why u espouse is barbaric system, we banded together to help each other survive and look out for our fellow man. It was called civilization. Those that wouldn't participate were banished.....do u feel like an outside Roy?
Click to expand...


No, what I propose is not barbaric. I have nothing against people making voluntary mutual defense pacts.

Looking out for fellow man is good, forcibly running anothers life for them by virtue of tyranny of the majority is identical to the process the warlords that you fear use. Can you offer any arguments that it isn't?

I don't feel outside...I feel very furry though.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
pikachuriu said:
So you only oppose your President, even if the US Democrat legislators support him? Seriously?

You're too chicken to call out Democrats who approve of your Presidents policy? No wonder your country is so messed up.
Click to expand...
Schumer is only protecting the farmers trump is screwing with his retarded and unwinnable trade war

Does it make you sad that everyone hates your racist hero who rapes women?
 
P

pikachuriu

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
Schumer is only protecting the farmers trump is screwing with his retarded and unwinnable trade war

Does it make you sad that everyone hates your racist hero who rapes women?
Click to expand...
Schumer likes and approves of your Presidents current stance regarding China. Please explain how his support for the very tactic you claim is screwing US farmers is protecting them. The farmers find that a bit confusing.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
pikachuriu said:
Schumer likes and approves of your Presidents current stance regarding China. Please explain how his support for the very tactic you claim is screwing US farmers is protecting them. The farmers find that a bit confusing.
Click to expand...
No, Schumer does not support your racist hero’s retarded and unwinnable trade war

He does want to protect farmers from your racist hero’s retarded and unwinnable trade war though

This is very simple to understand, so why can’t you? Dementia? Alzheimer’s? Suck too many trucker dicks?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top