Your response doesn't refute my assertion though.
Your "why don't you move to Somalia" picture is a rationalization, essentially saying if government X doesn't force you, these scary Somali guys will. You argument caves in on that basis.
You see a warlord is behaving like he's the government and uses the exact same means as any "ism based government" , that you presumably support.
Human relationships are either based in voluntary participation or involuntary participation. Both the warlord and government use an involuntary means don't they? That was a rhetorical question, yes, they do.