Announcement from Conroy....

CalyxCrusher

Well-Known Member
This is a dispensary with a reported 14 000 plus customer base and they couldn't fork over another 10K ......again something not adding up.
If you're truly being objective you would also consider the very thing you just stated. Just because someone can afford it doesn't mean it's right .So because he had a successful business whats another 10k? Seems like pretty convoluted and fucked up logic, not to mention bilking.

Let's say you're a contractor, would you charge wealthier people more than what the job costs simply because they make good money and whats another 10k anyway right?
 

willieboy

Well-Known Member
Always charge wealthy people more than poor people. It is the price they pay for having the bucks. Maybe it is different in other parts of the country, but here on the East Coast that is standard business practice.......
 

doingdishes

Well-Known Member
Don’t forget Conroy solicited future privacy breach funds. I wonder how many signed over their rights to compensation to Conroy, and if he still plans to collect those settlement funds?
he had folks sign irrevocable pledges just in case someone decided they needed the money for themselves
 

QUAD BREATH

Well-Known Member
doingdishes said:
Tousaw had no idea CONroy dropped going after the 150 and that came from Tousaw when i asked him but you found something that says it was a team decision...interesting.
I'll see if I can find that document later.....I'm just busy and in and out of house right now.
The document is the one I posted earlier: https://johnconroy.com/pdf/November-2015-Update.pdf

"Given the previous decision of the Federal Court of Appeal it was, in my opinion (one shared by the other counsel on the case), unlikely that that evidence would be admitted before another coram of the Court of Appeal....."
 

QUAD BREATH

Well-Known Member
QUAD BREATH said:
One of the best lawyers I have ever known. One of the best people I have ever known."
One mans opinion does not make it so.
The point is, if "doingdishes" is correct and John is a hack and a thief then Kirk is a fucking liar and shouldn't be trusted either.






 
Last edited:

QUAD BREATH

Well-Known Member
QUAD BREATH said:
This is a dispensary with a reported 14 000 plus customer base and they couldn't fork over another 10K ......again something not adding up.

If you're truly being objective you would also consider the very thing you just stated. Just because someone can afford it doesn't mean it's right .So because he had a successful business whats another 10k? Seems like pretty convoluted and fucked up logic, not to mention bilking.

Let's say you're a contractor, would you charge wealthier people more than what the job costs simply because they make good money and whats another 10k anyway right?
Did I say it was right? We don't know why he wanted another 10K = 20 hours

Convoluted? Okay, I'll try and be more clear. Here is what "doingdishes" first said:

"i know of another guy who used him. Bob Woolsey paid him over $100k for nothing! when CONroy asked for another $10k, Bob didn't have it so he just walked away and left him with nothing. Bob had to fight to get paperwork that he paid for."
 
Last edited:

CalyxCrusher

Well-Known Member
QUAD BREATH said:
This is a dispensary with a reported 14 000 plus customer base and they couldn't fork over another 10K ......again something not adding up.


Did I say it was right? We don't know why he wanted another 10K = 20 hours

Convoluted? Okay, I'll try and be more clear. Here is what "doingdishes" first said:

"i know of another guy who used him. Bob Woolsey paid him over $100k for nothing! when CONroy asked for another $10k, Bob didn't have it so he just walked away and left him with nothing. Bob had to fight to get paperwork that he paid for."
No but you DID imply that if they're successful and didn't want to pay another 10k on top of 100k then something seemed fishy. Just because someone is well off doesn't mean they should just pony up for the simple fact that they can. Id say that's more than convoluted reasoning, it's fucking shady and something a swindler would feel is alright. Pretty cut and dry.
 

doingdishes

Well-Known Member
did you notice that all the "proof" for CONroy being an upstanding and good person are quotes from CONroy himself?? we all know he would never lie
the defense of that quack blows my mind. patients know we got shafted on many fronts. if CONroy was such a good lawyer, why didn't he challenge the 150 carry/shipping limit? he lost that slam dunk so badly.
 

QUAD BREATH

Well-Known Member
No but you DID imply that if they're successful and didn't want to pay another 10k on top of 100k then something seemed fishy. Just because someone is well off doesn't mean they should just pony up for the simple fact that they can. Id say that's more than convoluted reasoning, it's fucking shady and something a swindler would feel is alright. Pretty cut and dry.
It seems fishy because he said Bob didn't have it. If he said Bob was unfairly asked for more money, then that is different.
It is not uncommon for lawyers to get deep into a case and ask for more money ....I'm not saying that isn't greasy - however, it is reality.
 
Last edited:

QUAD BREATH

Well-Known Member
did you notice that all the "proof" for CONroy being an upstanding and good person are quotes from CONroy himself?? we all know he would never lie
the defense of that quack blows my mind. patients know we got shafted on many fronts. if CONroy was such a good lawyer, why didn't he challenge the 150 carry/shipping limit? he lost that slam dunk so badly.
I showed you a video of Kirk saying he's upstanding.
I don't think all patients know they got shafted.
He addressed the 150 in the article I posted......if it is incompetent, as Turmel suggests, then Conroy's whole team is incompetent.

And yes, I am aware of what Turmel's analysis is.

Turmel also thinks that Alan Young is a piece of shit and Beemish and Allard are fucking moles.

If you are correct, what should blow your mind is why does he keep getting repeat business ?
 

doingdishes

Well-Known Member
so you LOVE CONroy..I get it and you think he's awesome and can do no wrong.
all the power to you. i have outlined why i do not and you want to pick it apart line by line...what are you going for?
yes Tousaw says he's great but that opinion is not shared by many.
if you truly know Allard, you know patients got screwed and denying means you don't know much about it or are simply refusing the facts.
who is taking it up-I don't care who does it as i don't deal with dispensaries. i hope for those who need it and do rely on them that they get someone other than the lame duck CONroy.
 
Top