To you, facts are lies. How Orwellian of you.
1. Sanders makes a vague and unfunded promise to provide equivalent or better healthcare for free to the user in exchange for the healthcare we have and like. His plan does not contain funding measures that state who will pay and how much. That's a fact.
2. Sanders bill outlaws any private insurance that duplicates what the federal government provides. As you point out this is a fact. You still haven't answered my question. If what Sanders promises is so great, why does he ban competition?
3. Sanders bill does not specify how it will be paid for. Sanders says so himself. (link to the full text is included in the quote cited below)
In my view, there needs to be vigorous debate as to the best way to finance our Medicare for All legislation
4 & 5. Regarding who will pay, in that same document, he talks about
Options to Make the Wealthy Pay Their Fair Share
This is all well and good. Soak the rich and all that. His paper is not a commitment, however, it is just a vague statement. I'm not saying it's bad, just that it's a vague promise. As he says, revenue raised over 10 years is 1.8 trillion, and the overall cost will be north of 30 trillion, so, yeah, it's not sufficient either.
6. As I said, he hasn't put the whole plan down in black and white. The bill you list is a symbolic one because it doesn't specify how it will be paid for, see facts 1-4. I do agree that he made a promise. Without funding measures it is only half done and therefore a vague promise.
7. Forcing healthy people into from plans they like into they ones don't want to pay for is exactly my point when I say Bernie's plan is a gift to Republicans. Also gift to Putin, indirectly. Read what
@abandonconflict has said on this subject. Try to listen and reason with him rather than simply react.
8. I have listed my reasons and am willing to continue to discuss your responses. Please be more factual in your next response.