Speaking of good plans:
Lockdowns are not good plans.
View attachment 4538541
View attachment 4538542
View attachment 4538543
These curves have exactly the same trajectory.
Except Italy and Spain have cases in the 100 thousands range per day and Sweden has cases in the 10 thousand range. Population density and a high rate of infection are big factors in flattening the curve, also Sweden has social distancing rules, they are de facto social isolating, just with less restrictive measures and a lot of voluntary action. A much better comparison for someone seeking the truth of the matter would be with similar nordic nations like Norway, Denmark and Finland and compare deaths, since Sweden has the worst testing program of them all.
Sweden 150 deaths/ 1m
Norway 30 death/ 1m
Denmark 60 deaths/ 1m (highest pop density)
Finland 17 death /1m*
* There is some evidence that Sauna bathing might be a contributing factor here, pop 5 mil/2 mil saunas.
Looks like its throw grandma under the bus, I doubt the chef epidemiologist will have a career there soon. He's gonna look like shit at the inquest, experimenting on a nation like this is not just unethical, its a crime against humanity. I wouldn't point to Sweden as an example of success, but of one of looming disaster.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Staff with no masks or sanitiser fear for residents as hundreds die in care homes
www.theguardian.com
Anger in Sweden as elderly pay price for coronavirus strategy
Staff with no masks or sanitiser fear for residents as hundreds die in care homes
It was just a few days after the ban on visits to his mother’s nursing home in the Swedish city of Uppsala, on 3 April, that Magnus Bondesson started to get worried.
“They [the home] opened up for Skype calls and that’s when I saw two employees. I didn’t see any masks and they didn’t have gloves on,” says Bondesson, a start-up founder and app developer.
“When I called again a few days later I questioned the person helping out, asking why they didn’t use face masks, and he said they were just following the guidelines.”
That same week there were numerous reports in Sweden’s national news media about just how badly the country’s nursing homes were starting to be hit by the coronavirus, with hundreds of cases confirmed at homes in Stockholm, the worst affected region, and infections in homes across the country.
Since then pressure has mounted on the government to explain how, despite a stated aim of protecting the elderly from the risks of Covid-19, a third of fatalities have been people living in care homes.
Last week, as figures released by the Public Health Agency of Sweden indicated that 1,333 people had now died of coronavirus, the country’s normally unflappable state epidemiologist Anders Tegnell admitted that the situation in care homes was worrying.
“This is our big problem area,” said Tegnell, the brains behind the government’s
relatively light-touch strategy, which has seen it ask, rather than order, people to avoid non-essential travel, work from home and stay indoors if they are over 70 or are feeling ill.
The same day prime minister Stefan Löfven said that the country faced a “serious situation” in its old people’s homes, announced efforts to step up protections, and ordered the country’s health inspectorate to investigate.
Lena Einhorn, a virologist who has been one of the leading domestic critics of Sweden’s coronavirus policy, told the Observer that the government and the health agency were still resisting the most obvious explanations.
“They have to admit that it’s a huge failure, since they have said the whole time that their main aim has been to protect the elderly,” she said. “But what is really strange is that they still do not acknowledge the likely route. They say it’s very unfortunate, that they are investigating, and that it’s a matter of the training personnel, but they will not acknowledge that presymptomatic or asymptomatic spread is a factor.”
more...