How it it a free for all? I haven't gotten any unemployment pay myself, and if I had quit my job (as opposed to being laid off) I would not have received any unemployment pay.Not just a free for all like it is now
Bro this is literally true of ANY POTUS, lol wth what a cop out responseIt’s a shame he was met with so much resistance with everything he did. Personality wise he’s not what I would of chose but I feel he could of got a lot of things done if everybody worked together
It's a shame that the most powerful leader in the world didn't have the common-sense understanding that if you want people to work with you, then you need to not be an asshole all the time.It’s a shame he was met with so much resistance with everything he did. Personality wise he’s not what I would of chose but I feel he could of got a lot of things done if everybody worked together
So you are just projecting that these 'able body people' are not raising their families today? A lot of white women are the main earners in their households and it only makes sense that more people who would traditionally be the ones toiling are not.So because you say so?
All the women worked if they could. They worked their asses off raising families. Very important job. Back then single family earners could provide for an entire family. Now everybody struggles and why I’m so against high taxes that usually hurt the middle
Oh good, I thought you were gonna say it had noting to do with holding down the minimum wage.So because you say so?
All the women worked if they could. They worked their asses off raising families. Very important job. Back then single family earners could provide for an entire family. Now everybody struggles and why I’m so against high taxes that usually hurt the middle
simple things for simpletons. Yours is just another repetition of the "both sides bad" idiotic propaganda slogan.It is literally this simple. Republicans favor cost above people and democrats favor people above all costs. That's about it.
Both sides ARE bad, one inherently worse than the other and it has been showing its ugly heads as if late. And so then YOU ALSO ADMIT Republicans are fiscally irresponsible, got it.simple things for simpletons. Yours is just another repetition of the "both sides bad" idiotic propaganda slogan.
Democrats fixed the budget crisis in California that Republicans created. Most of the Obama's term, he cut the deficit that Republicans created. The trope about Democrats being fiscally irresponsible was created by Republicans because, as Goering said -- accuse others of that which you are doing.
tourorism
Republicans paid for the propaganda you wrote. It's effective at suppressing votes. Or, better said, it was effective at suppressing votes before Trump and his Republicans showed us just how bad it can be when they are in charge.Both sides ARE bad, one inherently worse than the other and it has been showing its ugly heads as if late. And so then YOU ALSO ADMIT Republicans are fiscally irresponsible, got it.
I’ll take “because he addressed the desires of more Californian voters than the other guy” for $200, AlexRepublicans paid for the propaganda you wrote. It's effective at suppressing votes. Or, better said, it was effective at suppressing votes before Trump and his Republicans showed us just how bad it can be when they are in charge.
This society is changing to a diverse, multicultural democracy. White right wing conservatives had their heyday, Pete Wilson, for example. He ran on an anti brown skin agenda. It was the last time that agenda was effective. How is trashing US voters with heritage from Mexico going for them now?
I said it earlier. Gavin Newsome has something no Republican will ever have. A majority of votes.
Why is that?
A single act of “Civil disobedience” ( isn’t that what the rioters call it?) compared to the hundreds by the left. Nothing was burned, no stores were looted, no drivers pulled from cars. Wrong? Yes.
Who is “the left”?A single act of “Civil disobedience” ( isn’t that what the rioters call it?) compared to the hundreds by the left. Nothing was burned, no stores were looted, no drivers pulled from cars. Wrong? Yes.
Jan 6 was an armed insurrection, and they are terrorists...A single act of “Civil disobedience” ( isn’t that what the rioters call it?) compared to the hundreds by the left. Nothing was burned, no stores were looted, no drivers pulled from cars. Wrong? Yes.
turristsJan 6 was an armed insurrection, and they are terrorists...
Ha, I never noticed that if you say "terrorists" like an idiot, it sounds like "tourists".turrists
It fish slapped me from day 1Ha, I never noticed that if you say "terrorists" like an idiot, it sounds like "tourists".
A single act of “Civil disobedience” ( isn’t that what the rioters call it?) compared to the hundreds by the left. Nothing was burned, no stores were looted, no drivers pulled from cars. Wrong? Yes.
A single act of “Civil disobedience” ( isn’t that what the rioters call it?) compared to the hundreds by the left. Nothing was burned, no stores were looted, no drivers pulled from cars. Wrong? Yes.