Pine crest 99
Active Member
Bullshit,No. Only white people are taking the law into their own hands.
I know a lot of outlaws.
You’re wrong.
Bullshit,No. Only white people are taking the law into their own hands.
Reaching out really hard aren’t you.wow, just when i thought you couldn't get more full of shit....you swell up like Violet Beauregard....we live in one of the most racist cultures on the fucking planet, with systemic racism that has been in place since the FOUNDING of the nation....and people like you continue to deny it, while the police murder black people with practically no repercussion, when magat vermin like rittenhouse can murder people and get a free pass, when the republican party gerrymanders districts to steal the votes of minorities...maybe it's YOU
yeah, do they come to your white pride meetings and sell you stolen weapons and ammo?Bullshit,
I know a lot of outlaws.
You’re wrong.
no, just far enough to keep smearing you with your own shitReaching out really hard aren’t you.
Yeah you played that same tune when I asked you about how you feel about Trump's campaign giving the Russian's data on us Americans to aid in their attack on us.Interesting logic but I think many people who are labeled things that aren't true can be bothered by the connotation. Do you have any research that determined a correlation between having your feelings hurt by labeling and it being an indicator of the accuracy of the labeling? If so, I'd love to see it.
If I stood in the public square and blindly called you a pedophile, and you reacted negatively, I could ascertain you are indeed a pedophile. That doesn't seem dangerous at all. The social implications of my false labeling shouldn't concern you, anger you, or bother you at all.
But only the white supremacists make the news. Didn’t you say that?Bullshit,
I know a lot of outlaws.
You’re wrong.
For a white hating white boy you have the whitest avatar on this whole site. Am i right white?But only the white supremacists make the news. Didn’t you say that?
Embarrassing - none of that has relevance. And done in such a condescending way. Did you google labeling + emotion + correlation? Labeling, attaching a negative or positive tag to an individual outside of yourself. Affect labeling is a strategy used in therapy. For example, talking to a therapist about your feelings can improve your mood. The discussion was in regards to a negative emotional response being correlated to guilt. I am aware of studies, but this ain't it.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3444304/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17576282/
https://opentextbc.ca/introductiontopsychology/chapter/10-1-the-experience-of-emotion/
ask me for help if you get stuck on the big words....
You went into a tailspin and began posting articles with accusations containing zero successful prosecutions as to what you asserted. You provided Manafort's trials as proof positive yet he was convicted of financial crimes and lying, which isn't proof of your claim.Yeah you played that same tune when I asked you about how you feel about Trump's campaign giving the Russian's data on us Americans to aid in their attack on us.
I still don't think that you actually answered that one after playing stupid while getting me to chase my tail to get you the actual information that you pretended didn't matter before you just ignored it altogether like a good little propagandist troll.
https://www.rollitup.org/t/anyone-else-watching-the-kyle-rittenhouse-trial.1065377/post-16650028
https://www.rollitup.org/t/anyone-else-watching-the-kyle-rittenhouse-trial.1065377/post-16650038
https://www.rollitup.org/t/anyone-else-watching-the-kyle-rittenhouse-trial.1065377/post-16650311
sure it does, and it kept you quiet for a whole 5 minutes, that's pricelessEmbarrassing - none of that has relevance. And done in such a condescending way. Did you google labeling + emotion + correlation? Labeling, attaching a negative or positive tag to an individual outside of yourself. Affect labeling is a strategy used in therapy. For example, talking to a therapist about your feelings can improve your mood. The discussion was in regards to a negative emotional response being correlated to guilt. I am aware of studies, but this ain't it.
Being labeled and being a label, a small but distinct difference.Interesting logic but I think many people who are labeled things that aren't true can be bothered by the connotation. Do you have any research that determined a correlation between having your feelings hurt by labeling and it being an indicator of the accuracy of the labeling? If so, I'd love to see it.
If I stood in the public square and blindly called you a pedophile, and you reacted negatively, I could ascertain you are indeed a pedophile. That doesn't seem dangerous at all. The social implications of my false labeling shouldn't concern you, anger you, or bother you at all.
By the way, are you one of these fellows who cannot maintain a conversation without talking about Trump? I don't care about Trump. I don't like Trump. I wouldn't vote for Trump. I don't care what you think about Trump.Yeah you played that same tune when I asked you about how you feel about Trump's campaign giving the Russian's data on us Americans to aid in their attack on us.
I still don't think that you actually answered that one after playing stupid while getting me to chase my tail to get you the actual information that you pretended didn't matter before you just ignored it altogether like a good little propagandist troll.
https://www.rollitup.org/t/anyone-else-watching-the-kyle-rittenhouse-trial.1065377/post-16650028
https://www.rollitup.org/t/anyone-else-watching-the-kyle-rittenhouse-trial.1065377/post-16650038
https://www.rollitup.org/t/anyone-else-watching-the-kyle-rittenhouse-trial.1065377/post-16650311
This sounds eerily similar to monty python reasoning. Burn the witch!Being labeled and being a label, a small but distinct difference.
Call me whatever you want, its truth is its only weight. How ome reacts is a chioce, and most of the time people who get upset at getting called a pedophile arw pedophiles and people who used to be pedophiles.
You are wrong. But I get it, you will not actually admit it because you are a far right fuckboy troll. Or at least cat fishing as one.You went into a tailspin and began posting articles with accusations containing zero successful prosecutions as to what you asserted. You provided Manafort's trials as proof positive yet he was convicted of financial crimes and lying, which isn't proof of your claim.
Sweet troll. You got me good huh.By the way, are you one of these fellows who cannot maintain a conversation without talking about Trump? I don't care about Trump. I don't like Trump. I wouldn't vote for Trump. I don't care what you think about Trump.
As I said in that thread, I am not familiar with your claim but I am open to information. You only provided an MSM piece in relation to accusations against Manafort before any trial. I stated Manafort was found guilty on financial crimes and I think that was the end of our dialogue. If you have other information on Trump providing data to the Russian military to aid their attack on Americans, which is a significant charge, I would be open to it. Where?You are wrong. But I get it, you will not actually admit it because you are a far right fuckboy troll. Or at least cat fishing as one.
Manafort being found guilty and accepting a pardon (which is also accepting guilt of those crimes) is not proof of these very real crimes committed.
But whatever man, troll on. I was just pointing out how full of shit you are because you tried to play the same stupid as shit game with others that you already did earlier like the idiot troll that you are.
Sweet troll. You got me good huh.
It is telling that you can't even answer if you are ok with the fact that the RNC data Trump received was handed over to the Russian military to aid their attack on us Americans.
Hes dancing around that somehow people who cant control their reactions to irrationalness are somehow vicitms of anyone other then themselvesThis sounds eerily similar to monty python reasoning. Burn the witch!
Not once from what I’ve seen.For a white hating white boy you have the whitest avatar on this whole site. Am i right white?
You claim reaction to a particular accusation is a reliable way to determine guilt. Is that a mischaracterization? If so, show me something. I'd enjoy learning the accuracy of this method.Hes dancing around that somehow people who cant control their reactions to irrationalness are somehow vicitms of anyone other then themselves
.. take accountability for only yourself
'MSM' Nice one troll. Keep on selling.As I said in that thread, I am not familiar with your claim but I am open to information. You only provided an MSM piece in relation to accusations against Manafort before any trial. I stated Manafort was found guilty on financial crimes and I think that was the end of our dialogue. If you have other information on Trump providing data to the Russian military to aid their attack on Americans, which is a significant charge, I would be open to it. Where?