Nice. Are those under your QB96's?
It's in a 4x4 tent. I just moved it in that tent though, it was in a 32"x32" tent for first two weeks of flowering under 120watts of QB288, and I moved it to the larger tent less than a week ago. Now it's under a 315w cmh plus 4 QB96's, I think just at 50watts each. They are just there to hit the corners of the tent the 315 doesn't fill. The soil is in it's first generation, and is a blend of happy frog, ewc, rice hulls, and some espoma plant-tone. I'm not sure of the pot size, it was just the largest one I had available in the back yard, but I know it's really too small. I think it might be 7-gallon, maybe 10. I didn't really plan this grow, it just kind of happened. I was going to keep the plant as a mother, and then decided that I didn't like the strain enough to keep it, but I didn't want to toss the plant either, so figured I'd give it another try, and in soil this time instead of coco. My feed regimen is a mix. I'm topdressing with espoma weekly, and have a few different solutions that I irrigate with. Sometimes just water, sometimes a mix of kelp/fish/microbes/fulvic, and sometimes Jacks 321. I only feed salts intermittently, but I'm not a purist, and it's not "organic". I have some good beneficial insects crawling around too, and pests have been no issue lately at all. I never spray any chem pesticides, I am a purist in that regard. I even avoid organic pesticides tbh.Nice. Are those under your QB96's?
And
What's the tent and pot size?
How long have you been using the soil?
And what are you feeding (organics or salts)?
Nice man. I knew you had some QB's in there. My favorite is CMH with LED. But I'm gonna try these HLG UVA strips and see if they work as well.It's in a 4x4 tent. I just moved it in that tent though, it was in a 32"x32" tent for first two weeks of flowering under 120watts of QB288, and I moved it to the larger tent less than a week ago. Now it's under a 315w cmh plus 4 QB96's, I think just at 50watts each. They are just there to hit the corners of the tent the 315 doesn't fill. The soil is in it's first generation, and is a blend of happy frog, ewc, rice hulls, and some espoma plant-tone. I'm not sure of the pot size, it was just the largest one I had available in the back yard, but I know it's really too small. I think it might be 7-gallon, maybe 10. I didn't really plan this grow, it just kind of happened. I was going to keep the plant as a mother, and then decided that I didn't like the strain enough to keep it, but I didn't want to toss the plant either, so figured I'd give it another try, and in soil this time instead of coco. My feed regimen is a mix. I'm topdressing with espoma weekly, and have a few different solutions that I irrigate with. Sometimes just water, sometimes a mix of kelp/fish/microbes/fulvic, and sometimes Jacks 321. I only feed salts intermittently, but I'm not a purist, and it's not "organic". I have some good beneficial insects crawling around too, and pests have been no issue lately at all. I never spray any chem pesticides, I am a purist in that regard. I even avoid organic pesticides tbh.
One thing nobody raised in this clusterduck of a thread is reliability of testing.
the discrepancy in the testing figures could as easily explained by light labouratories inconsistent testing results, gml's own light tested around 10% higher than i should have. hlg might have had these lights tested multiple times and chose to publish just the best results...
What happened to “I don’t know what’s going on” or “I can’t comment”
So you’re done quoting me? Appreciate it ThanksWhat happened is I took the time to look into this.
And like you, your not going to change my mind, except that I bothered to look at both sides of the story before deciding where the truth lay.
and it's time to stop feeding the troll.
I got a solution for you. If you don't like HLG don't buy one. Problem solved,@pop22 well can you please explain the HLG position on this subject - do they have any data to back up there claims , the concern in my view is the fool GML stated LED company's supply fake lights for testing and singled out HLG - I would like to see paper work backing this claim up, also I think its time(as @Rocket Soul ) stated earlier maybe we as customers need to be asking questions of the testing outlets .. -HAS anyone asked questions of testing outlets to comment on this subject ?
Not targeting HLG at all I think people are generally concerned that they are buying what they were told they were getting - sales reps always blame employers when things go pear shape ...
Also that fool GML has edited his video to the point it's all out of context- he does this all the time - he needs to back up his statements with facts still waiting he did the same a few years back.. pretty sure he is not taking his meds
-as they say you cant make a silk purse of of a sows ear
We’re not. We’re discussing their “accused dishonesty” in their testing. Is that ok with you?I got a solution for you. If you don't like HLG don't buy one. Problem solved,
"Accused" by an ex distributor that got tossed for having hlg's lights reverse engineered in china, as well as demanding a 10% stake in the company.We’re not. We’re discussing their “accused dishonesty” in their testing. Is that ok with you?
i dont get the sending lights to china to reverse engineer part, like why?, there is nothing hidden no magic to uncover, hlg literally tell you all the specs on the website?."Accused" by an ex distributor that got tossed for having hlg's lights reverse engineered in china, as well as demanding a 10% stake in the company.
So you can have your knockoffs designed for your new business venture.i dont get the sending lights to china to reverse engineer part, like why?,
yer but the guy in china doesnt need the light in his hands to copy, he could just go on hlg's website and copy the specs.So you can have your knockoffs designed for your new business venture
That’s not how reverse engineering works.yer but the guy in china doesnt need the light in his hands to copy, he could just go on hlg's website and copy the specs.
lol, theres nothing to reverse engineer.That’s not how reverse engineering works.
So you think you can design a light just based on specs eh?lol, theres nothing to reverse engineer.