cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
Short Airbus!
Actually politics is based in other people controlling you. libertarianism is based in you controlling you, as long as you aren't trying to control others.It is impossible to actually be libertarian. It is the political equivalent of dividing by zero.
We have had this attempt at a discussion. All one has to do is look up Lysander Spooner’s proposed society to lay bare the irreducible utopian component.Actually politics is based in other people controlling you. libertarianism is based in you controlling you, as long as you aren't trying to control others.
It is difficult to be libertarian. (anarchist) because some people have zero understanding of what anarchy is. It simply means without an "archon" or ruler, not necessarily without rules.
Fallacious reasoning? Oh dear.you have invariably ignored the demonstrations of the fallacious reasoning on which you rely.
Your premises are incorrect.Fallacious reasoning? Oh dear.
It is impossible for a person to delegate a right to do somethng to a body politic if that person doesn't have that right in the first place. It is impossible for a group of people to delegate to a body politic the aggregate of all of their "zero right" to do something and come up with a positive sum.
A coercion based government is literally an attempt to rationalize the impossible and conjure a positive sum from a bag of zeroes..
Your grade on this essay ? Zero.
So it IS possible to delegate a right you don't have to other people? Sounds like you're dividing by zero.
View attachment 5198869
Frump is not a libertarian and has no idea what one is, apparently neither do you.It appears the Frump useful idiots are amassing. And the vortex created by their vacuum is consuming them as the attempt to eat everything.
Nope not a clue. Fake some more stuff and eat some some jerky.Frump is not a libertarian and has no idea what one is, apparently neither do you.
It's not a strawman to point out that the alleged reason for having government, "to protect rights" is flawed.
To wit, the first thing government does is VIOLATE everyone's rights by assuming consent when none is given or can be given since no person has that right, to delegate to a "representative" .
How things might or might not be done in a libertarian society are valid questions, but to assume that a system which is based in large scale consent violation can also be the protector of rights is flawed and utopian and impossible.
That is a nice strawman in your picture, but it's not applicable. You said libertarianism was impossible yet have embraced a political system which is self evidently incapable of being a protection agent since it violates individual consent from the get go. That is impossible and your strawman assertion is lame and...well...a strawman.
You mean like the liberty and freedom just stripped away from women by Republicans?
I think you may be shocked
Your repube self made it that way.This thread is about Libertarians, please take your Republican hate boner into the closet and relieve yourself. Then come out and talk about libertarian shit.
Libertarians are shitThis thread is about Libertarians, please take your Republican hate boner into the closet and relieve yourself. Then come out and talk about libertarian shit.
Confessing?Frump is not a libertarian and has no idea what one is, apparently neither do you.
Your fear of the unknown and misunderstood is showing. A free market IS a regulated market, since it relies on consumer feedback and the ability to leave a shitty supplier and go to another one that provides better service. That is a peaceful form of market regulation.
Wut?Confessing?
I think you are confusing "imposed order" with "peaceful".Ungovernable areas don’t seem to have a prosperous and peaceful population.