The Junk Drawer

HGCC

Well-Known Member
Does the schizo argument ever come up in NA from those who opposed legalization? By now quite a few years ago British scientists published the results of research into a link between schizophrenia and the consumption of cannabis. Politicians throughout europe have been cherrypicking that report since. The only thing it proved is a correlation between schizophrenia and cannabis use, no causation the other way around. That is, they specifically looked at cannabis use among schizophrenics, not schizophrenia among cannabis users.


"Wissing [Transport minister] holds a skeptical view of the substance. Confidentially, he talks about judgments he had to make as a judge before his political career. He dealt with some cases involving patients with paranoid schizophrenia. They had often consumed cannabis on a large scale; and it was Wissing, as the judge, who had to order that they be placed in hold in a psychiatric facility."

Again he goes from schizos use cannabis to cannabis users become schizophrenic. The reason his opinion weighs heavy is because it's all about transport, specifically across borders. As I mentioned a few months ago when they delayed their ambitious plans the first time, they assume it's not going to happen yet and the EU will not allow it. (2004 treaty, eu member states are required to fight drug trafficking including cannabis)

"On Wednesday, Health Minister Karl Lauterbach unveiled what he described as a "two-prong" model for gradually legalize possession of cannabis in Germany. Speaking together with Agriculture Minister Cem Özdemir of the Green Party, he announced the following steps:
  • The initial cultivation and distribution of the drug would be made possible in special associations called "cannabis clubs," where the purchase of a maximum of 25 grams would be permitted, with a monthly maximum per person of 50 grams.
  • Private cultivation would be allowed of up to three plants.
  • In a second step, sales through licensed specialist stores would be tested in pilot regions.
For the time being, though, it appears that the complete legalization of the drug has been taken off the table in Germany."

That's 3 more plants than we're allowed to grow though. Another issue that's not tackled with a unified approach; the number of plants mean nothing, it doesn't take into account the space, the light, the veg time, or even whether it's male or female.

It's almost funny how some European countries are struggling with the issue. For decades they complained about the dutch (non-)solution (keep the grows and supply illegal and show EU+UN we're still fighting the war on drugs, but decriminalize shops and customers). Others, like Germany, have looked at Barcelona and its cannabis social clubs for inspiration but unlike Germany, so far anyway, concluded it doesn't address a major issue: tourists can't join a club yet the more easily available cannabis means there will be plenty of it to buy on the streets. A major contributor to the idea of social cannabis clubs in Barcelona is the fact they didn't want it "to become Amsterdam". Now Germany, aimed for full legalization (though heavily regulated) and now does the same, for partly the same wrong reasons. It'll take years before it's more normalized throughout Germany and they'll team up with NL and few others to finally legalize it throughout the EU.
No, the schizophrenia link stuff didn't really come up much as an issue. Maybe since legalization was eased into with the medical aspect. Personally I am curious how the legalization of hallucinogens goes in that regard.

Good for you guys, the personal cultivation thing is big to me just from a hobby type standpoint. Like brewing your own beer, it's a fun hobby to grow your own dope. If prices are up around 500 CAD then it would be a much bigger deal.
 

HGCC

Well-Known Member
Not uncommon for cannabis users. Coffeeshops in Amsterdam are tolerated not legal, and they get very few warning if customers cause a disturbance so they’re not too happy with drunks either.

The reason Brits are targetted with the Stay Away campaign is largely simply because most tourists in Amsterdam are from UK, Germany and Belgium. Germans, for obvious historical reasons, do not often cause problems, especially not in groups. Belgium is our Canada, they’re polite af, you can leave your door unlocked and they dress like it’s 1989.


Do Floridians too walk around with dildos that can squirt beer on their foreheads? They’re more like the spring breakers who instead of going to our Florida (Spain, where they have quite the reputation too) went to cramped center of Amsterdam.
Have you been to Florida lol.

I was trying to think of a good US comparison for what I saw of the folks coming to party in Amsterdam were like (not the people perse but the atmosphere), spring break wasn't quite it. It was much more like bourbon st during Mardi Gras. Can't quite articulate the why though, perhaps it's just that new Orleans has very old buildings for a US city. Also the revelry was contained to one area. Or the Cajun accents are as hard to understand as someone speaking any other language you don't really know. It is a big mass of really really wasted folks, late at night it's pretty bonkers in both...but during daylight hours tourist destinations that people take their kids.
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
Does the schizo argument ever come up in NA from those who opposed legalization? By now quite a few years ago British scientists published the results of research into a link between schizophrenia and the consumption of cannabis. Politicians throughout europe have been cherrypicking that report since. The only thing it proved is a correlation between schizophrenia and cannabis use, no causation the other way around. That is, they specifically looked at cannabis use among schizophrenics, not schizophrenia among cannabis users.


"Wissing [Transport minister] holds a skeptical view of the substance. Confidentially, he talks about judgments he had to make as a judge before his political career. He dealt with some cases involving patients with paranoid schizophrenia. They had often consumed cannabis on a large scale; and it was Wissing, as the judge, who had to order that they be placed in hold in a psychiatric facility."

Again he goes from schizos use cannabis to cannabis users become schizophrenic. The reason his opinion weighs heavy is because it's all about transport, specifically across borders. As I mentioned a few months ago when they delayed their ambitious plans the first time, they assume it's not going to happen yet and the EU will not allow it. (2004 treaty, eu member states are required to fight drug trafficking including cannabis)

"On Wednesday, Health Minister Karl Lauterbach unveiled what he described as a "two-prong" model for gradually legalize possession of cannabis in Germany. Speaking together with Agriculture Minister Cem Özdemir of the Green Party, he announced the following steps:
  • The initial cultivation and distribution of the drug would be made possible in special associations called "cannabis clubs," where the purchase of a maximum of 25 grams would be permitted, with a monthly maximum per person of 50 grams.
  • Private cultivation would be allowed of up to three plants.
  • In a second step, sales through licensed specialist stores would be tested in pilot regions.
For the time being, though, it appears that the complete legalization of the drug has been taken off the table in Germany."

That's 3 more plants than we're allowed to grow though. Another issue that's not tackled with a unified approach; the number of plants mean nothing, it doesn't take into account the space, the light, the veg time, or even whether it's male or female.

It's almost funny how some European countries are struggling with the issue. For decades they complained about the dutch (non-)solution (keep the grows and supply illegal and show EU+UN we're still fighting the war on drugs, but decriminalize shops and customers). Others, like Germany, have looked at Barcelona and its cannabis social clubs for inspiration but unlike Germany, so far anyway, concluded it doesn't address a major issue: tourists can't join a club yet the more easily available cannabis means there will be plenty of it to buy on the streets. A major contributor to the idea of social cannabis clubs in Barcelona is the fact they didn't want it "to become Amsterdam". Now Germany, aimed for full legalization (though heavily regulated) and now does the same, for partly the same wrong reasons. It'll take years before it's more normalized throughout Germany and they'll team up with NL and few others to finally legalize it throughout the EU.
i'll be perfectly honest with you, i'd rather things stay the way they are here...My state is not legal, but i'd rather take the risk than have the completely ignorant and stupid legislators make the entire process incredibly complex and completely stupid...all they ever succeed in doing is fucking over the small growers, and making poor quality, moldy, pesticide contaminated shit available to people who don't know any better.
 

Sativied

Well-Known Member
Good for you guys, the personal cultivation thing is big to me just from a hobby type standpoint. Like brewing your own beer, it's a fun hobby to grow your own dope. If prices are up around 500 CAD then it would be a much bigger deal.
:( Unfortunately I meant 3 more plants in Germany than the zero we‘re allowed in NL. Judges rarely convict people even if they have up to a hundred but that still leaves insane claims from the IRS and often getting kicked out of your home even mortgage cancelled. For decades it used to be 5 plants (hence the typical 10 regular seeds or 5 fem per pack). Cops would kill them but no lasting consequences.

I’d be really really happy with 5 plants again, would gladly take 3.

I could always flush a few down the toilet when the cops knock at the door :lol:

8x cannalope haze, 2x wineballs in my closet atm. Carbon filter and sound-proofed fan but it’s not as relaxed as it used to be. I started again cause that 500cad more than offsets my new energy bill.

46388E64-11F5-4971-AFCE-5FB5C87553AB.jpeg

i'll be perfectly honest with you, i'd rather things stay the way they are here...My state is not legal, but i'd rather take the risk than have the completely ignorant and stupid legislators make the entire process incredibly complex and completely stupid...all they ever succeed in doing is fucking over the small growers, and making poor quality, moldy, pesticide contaminated shit available to people who don't know any better.
Oh me too, or more specifically back to how it was, a non-issue. And yes, that’s exactly what’s going on. Shops used to be supplied by many small growers, many had just 5 plants to stay out of trouble. Enough to pay a mortgage on a decent house. A free market with no interference of the government. It was part of the charm of shops. Like every bar having its own brewers. About a decade ago they started hunting and harrashing small growers more fanatically, leading to more large illegal grows in abandoned buildings, farms, attics, even inside bridges and old bunkers, or just rented homes to fill with plants. They’d hook up to the powergrid illegally and/or burn the place down. Giving growers an even worse reputation. Heat cams in helicopters, smart meters from energy co, scratch cards to learn cannabis plants odor in everyone’s mailbox so more would snitch.

A cycle that caused a lot of the supply to end up in the hand of criminal organizations and actual cartels, people with guns and no love or respect for the product and culture. Now they’re trying to come up with heavily regulated permits for a select few supplying to shops in just one town/city. A problem with that is banks don’t want customers who make money producing “drugs”. There’s no end in sight.
 

HGCC

Well-Known Member
It's rather surprising that it was a bunch of small grows that provided the supply. It always seemed fairly uniform in terms of quality...and it seemed like they moved through it quickly so would need a lot of it.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
:( Unfortunately I meant 3 more plants in Germany than the zero we‘re allowed in NL. Judges rarely convict people even if they have up to a hundred but that still leaves insane claims from the IRS and often getting kicked out of your home even mortgage cancelled. For decades it used to be 5 plants (hence the typical 10 regular seeds or 5 fem per pack). Cops would kill them but no lasting consequences.

I’d be really really happy with 5 plants again, would gladly take 3.

I could always flush a few down the toilet when the cops knock at the door :lol:

8x cannalope haze, 2x wineballs in my closet atm. Carbon filter and sound-proofed fan but it’s not as relaxed as it used to be. I started again cause that 500cad more than offsets my new energy bill.

View attachment 5283431


Oh me too, or more specifically back to how it was, a non-issue. And yes, that’s exactly what’s going on. Shops used to be supplied by many small growers, many had just 5 plants to stay out of trouble. Enough to pay a mortgage on a decent house. A free market with no interference of the government. It was part of the charm of shops. Like every bar having its own brewers. About a decade ago they started hunting and harrashing small growers more fanatically, leading to more large illegal grows in abandoned buildings, farms, attics, even inside bridges and old bunkers, or just rented homes to fill with plants. They’d hook up to the powergrid illegally and/or burn the place down. Giving growers an even worse reputation. Heat cams in helicopters, smart meters from energy co, scratch cards to learn cannabis plants odor in everyone’s mailbox so more would snitch.

A cycle that caused a lot of the supply to end up in the hand of criminal organizations and actual cartels, people with guns and no love or respect for the product and culture. Now they’re trying to come up with heavily regulated permits for a select few supplying to shops in just one town/city. A problem with that is banks don’t want customers who make money producing “drugs”. There’s no end in sight.
to your last paragraph—
and yet they’ll positively suck up to an exec from Hoffmann-LaRoche.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
i've never understood why they want to make robots look like people, we're designed very poorly for most work...
I just imagine a world 20 years down the road, considering the rate at which technology is accelerating with a global culture linked by the internet and on the cusp of AI. We might well have robots who can function as humans for limited tasks, it would end up a world of robot slaves and companions eventually and no person would work unless they wanted to, were able to do and understand the work. When humanoid robots show up that are useful and cheap enough it will be the end of work for many or new jobs. We need fewer people to live well as time goes by, we put those productivity gains into living even better and employing more people in service jobs. This won't go on forever and many of those service jobs will be automated one day.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
i've never understood why they want to make robots look like people, we're designed very poorly for most work...
If most people could buy a humanoid robot to do household tasks cheap enough, they would. Someone to do the dishes, make the bed, make your breakfast, mow the lawn, take out the garbage, the list is long. It would be like an old-fashioned wife! :lol:
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
Acceptance. If they'd be pure function over design it would make people (potentially its coworkers) even more unconformable.
i get that, but it seems like a poor reason to build what is basically a crippled robot, when a different design would make them much more efficient...
They don't give one shit about how comfortable workers are, and haven't for....fucking ever...why start now, in a way that lowers efficiency?
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
If most people could buy a humanoid robot to do household tasks cheap enough, they would. Someone to do the dishes, make the bed, make your breakfast, mow the lawn, take out the garbage, the list is long. It would be like an old-fashioned wife! :lol:
i guess i'm the odd one out then...again.
I would rather buy one that looked like a black box with metal arms...It's a machine with no personality, and i don't want it to have one.
I don't want to play chess with it, or go on vacation with it, or discuss the news with it. It isn't a person, and i would rather it not look like one.
vacuum the floors, feed the turtles, then go sit in the corner till i make a mess...
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
i get that, but it seems like a poor reason to build what is basically a crippled robot, when a different design would make them much more efficient...
They don't give one shit about how comfortable workers are, and haven't for....fucking ever...why start now, in a way that lowers efficiency?
because the corollary of acceptance is marketability.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
i guess i'm the odd one out then...again.
I would rather buy one that looked like a black box with metal arms...It's a machine with no personality, and i don't want it to have one.
I don't want to play chess with it, or go on vacation with it, or discuss the news with it. It isn't a person, and i would rather it not look like one.
vacuum the floors, feed the turtles, then go sit in the corner till i make a mess...
I’d like a centauroid. Like a small giraffe with hands, possibly more than two of them.
 
Top