good article about conspiracy theory

B..

Well-Known Member
It is entirely predictable that conspiracy theories will surface around any major catastrophe or big event in world history. The larger question may be why this is so? While it is true that there have been active conspiracies behind the scenes of world history it is completely illogical to assume that every major event and every catastrophe is caused by invisible saboteurs working behind the scenes.

Sometimes bad things just happen and sometimes big events materialize for exactly the reason that is seen on the surface. Look at your own individual life for instance. The last time you had an auto accident do you think some conspirator tampered with the brakes or was it just a bad combination of events? In almost every case the bad stuff that happens to us is caused by the obvious.

Even so it is with the world. Once in a while a conspiracy may pull something off, but most of the time a natural course of events is to blame.

The tsunami was caused by a major earthquake that just happens to occur with regularity in our history.

We went to the moon because we built a Saturn rocket and blasted off not because conspirators built a Hollywood set and fooled us.

Why is it so hard to believe that 911 was caused by terrorists especially in the face of the fact that Osama Bin Laden admitted that he was the mastermind?

Then with this lasted terrorist act in London it was only days before conspiracy theories started to fly. G8 leaders (including Bush), bankers and others must have been involved.

Let's take a look at this last one. They have a tremendous amount of photographic and other hard evidence of who was involved. They have in custody a number of the perpetrators and they are talking. In the face of all this just imagine how lucky conspirators would have had to have been to pull this off.

They would have had to execute the plan so flawlessly that the press wouldn't have been able to pick up a trail. The press throughout the world hates Bush and if they could pin anything like this on him or other G8 leaders they would.

Thousands of police are investigating. Somehow the conspirators would have had to cover all their tracks so perfectly that none could follow leads to them.

They may say that those who executed the attack were lower level dupes, but so many were involved that it would only be a matter of time before someone would talk and expose the conspiracy.

Now let us get back to the question as to why conspiracy is seen in so many places?

The answer is you find what you are looking for and if you suspect a conspiracy and look for it you will find evidence.

For instance, let us suppose that you suspect your spouse is having an affair and he is completely innocent. Even though he is innocent will you still find what you are looking for? Yes, in almost every case where unreasonable suspicions arise, evidence will be found to confirm them.

So why do conspiracy people look for insidious motive under every rock?

There are several reasons why conspiracies are looked for. Here are a few:

1. The theorist likes to see himself as more intelligent than the crowd and to see beyond what appears to be obvious is one way to affirm this. The trouble is that so many people are swallowing conspiracy these days that the effect is the opposite. Today the conspiracy theorist often goes along with the crowd.
2. The theorist is often anti authority and looks for sinister motives within the powers that be.
3. The theorist is often an intellectual with good powers of observation and loves the game of using his mind to see cause beyond the obvious cause. It's a little like seeing the face of Jesus in an ink blot. It's kind of a fun intellectual exercise.
4. The theorist often has a theological belief system that needs a conspiracy involved to make all the pieces fit.
5. There is a particular person in power (like Bush or Clinton) that the theorists just hates and is happy to blame for the world's problems.
6. he theorist is often having a tough life and instead of taking responsibility for it he blames it on the bankers, politicians or whoever working behind the scenes to desecrate his life.

Most conspiracy people are barely surviving financially.

The one area where some proven conspiracy has been involved in history is assassination. Because this can be pulled off by the outward work of one person or even accomplished subtly through poisoning and other means this has been the work of conspiracy throughout history. Because an assassination can be pulled off in seconds the cover-up is much easier than an earth-shaking event such as 911.

How can we be expected to find the truth in spiritual matters if we cannot see the obvious in the events happening in the world around us? To see reality as it is, is always a good exercise of the spiritual mind in sharpening the discernment of truth.

The problem is that the conspiracy people have always looked for the problem where it is not rather than where it is. They look for it among the "flesh and blood" and blame the Jews, the bankers, Bush, Clinton, the CFR, the U.N., Communism, Bilderbergs, Rockefellers, the Illuminati, the occult, etc.

The reason that so many are accused of being dark conspirators is that the true conspiracy is a moving target and has worked to some degree through almost every organization and people in our history.

Where the conspiracy is working in the present is only clearly seen by a few. After a generation passes it is seen by the many. Then the many make the mistake of seeing evil where it is not. While the conspiracy has moved on to a new group or territory as its focus of power the masses miss this and see evil where it was in the past and miss its location in the present.

For example, the powers of "spiritual wickedness in high places" shifted its attention to Hitler and Germany in the late 1920s. From this point until the beginning of World War 2 there were only a few who saw them as a focus of evil. One of the few was Winston Churchill who received a soul impression the first time he heard Hitler's name. He sensed a great danger to the world immediately and spent seven years trying to warn the world. He was a laughing stock in Britain until Hitler invaded Poland. Then they turned to him for leadership.

Sure there were quite a few before the war who saw Hitler as a bad guy, but there were dozens of bad leaders in the world and he was no more to be feared than any of the rest, so they thought. Most leaders thought that if they dealt with him diplomatically that he could be handled and controlled.

Now a generation has passed the masses see the situation for what it really was -- that the powers of darkness did indeed work through Hitler and he was a great threat to the world just as Churchill had warned.

Now people see anything that reeks of Nazism as evil. The Aryan Nations (who have Nazi beliefs) moved their headquarters to Northern Idaho some time ago and almost everyone in the state was greatly alarmed and did everything they could to destroy the group. The group suffered harassment and lawsuits until it was destroyed financially and the compound leveled. Many thought they had destroyed a great evil.

The truth is that these people were no more a threat than some inner city gang of kids. They were not going anywhere. The true conspiracy had moved away from this failed attempt to a new one right after the war.

The new focus was on Communism, its socialistic philosophy with totalitarian implementation. This was empowered through bankers and powerful people who worked behind the scenes. The main focus was the Soviet Union but the dark energy gravitated wherever it could find a response and there were many agents of the conspiracy in the United States and Europe seeking to overthrow the free world.

Again, Winston Churchill saw the danger. It was he who coined the term "Iron Curtain" in reference to the Soviets and again he was ignored.

Another person who saw the danger was Joe McCarthy and in his attempt to expose the conspiracy he became vilified as bad or worse than Hitler. He made some mistakes, but each person he accused as being a communist conspirator turned out to be one as revealed by new records released in Russia after the fall of the Soviet Union.

There must be a dozen movies out portraying the guy as an epitome of evil, but such is the fate of one who takes on the conspiracy.

A group who saw many elements of the conspiracy was the John Birch Society. This organization was also hated just as Joe McCarthy was. I majored in political science in the sixties and the professors hated the Birchers with a passion. I worked on the university paper and everyone there made fun of the Birchers.

The truth is the Birchers were hated and received such bad press all over the nation because they obtained some insights to the conspiracy and sought to expose it.

BUT after the fall of the Berlin Wall the Dark Brothers changed their focus of attention away from Communism and toward greener pastures. After this shift occurred the powers that be no longer attacked the John Birth Society because they were no longer a threat. They were now looking for the conspiracy where it used to be rather than where it now is. Now they are often taken in and manipulated by the conspiracy.

In addition there are many break-offs of the Birchers and similar groups who still see the conspiracy as a behind the scenes Illuminati seeking a new world order. This was attempted and failed through the Soviet Union. The conspiracy has moved on.

Now the conspiracy operates through the disaffected in the Moslem world. Unlike Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union there is not a single country that we can identify and fight against, though Iran is receiving some attention. Instead the conspiracy has attached itself to many thousands of disaffected Moslems that have an amazingly similar mindset -- almost as if they all came from the same school.

Because this is where the conspiracy is, explains why Bush has encountered such great friction in fighting it. Whoever goes against it will be "hated of all nations."

If we are successful in establishing a democracy in Iraq and other Moslem nations follow its example then the conspiracy will move on. If democracy fails then the conspiracy will stay there for some time and attempt to destroy the free world.

I have followed the Conspiracy theories for over 40 years and all this time they have been predicting such a collapse within the next year or two. I'll tell you if there is a conspiracy they seem to be pretty powerless in fulfilling their word as passed down to the true believers. Conspiracy believers have been wrong on every prediction they have made for over 40 years. How much credibility do they have? How much have they proven they really know? Not much. Even a stopped clock is right twice a day and sooner or later we may have a collapse. Right now the danger is not from an Illuminati but from a government that spends like drunken sailors and a people wanting a free lunch. Such overspending is indeed a real danger. I know this is a danger but I know of no one with any credible knowledge of a shadow conspiracy that is able predict anything of note.

How many times on this list have we seen predictions of what the Conspiracy was up to and nothing happened?

Here is one of them from message http://groups.yahoo.com/group/davids_ou ... sage/20002:

"Paul Wofowitz will authorize the detonation of a nuclear payload in the Houston area on December 27, 2004. The Hidden Hand network (Mossad/al-Qaeda/SAS) of which he is the nominal controller has verified in advance every aspect of operational integrity - a failsafe job with zero chance of discovery.

"Houston has been primed for months via deliberate mismanagement, incompetence, corruption and embezzlement at its FEMA-independent Emergency Center. The police and fire services have been deliberately and systematically sabotaged and thrown into administrative chaos so as to ensure maximum fatalities in the aftermath of the detonation. However, the existence of the center will provide the Bush administration with a 'we did everything we could' excuse.

"We believe the Hidden Hand envisages the following scenario:

"1. Detonation on Dec 27 (could be delayed, but all our intercepts point to this date).

"2. The State Department blames 'al-Qaeda,' whose leaders are allegedly hiding in Iran.

"3. Iran (truthfully) denies giving refuge to said leaders.

"4. Bush issues Iran with a cowboy-style deadline for delivery of alleged leaders.

"5. Iran fails to comply because it cannot.

"6. UN convenes in emergency session - no agreement (Watch Ariel Sharon quietly flee to his private estate in Greece).

"7. Other foreign intelligence agencies dispute the State Department version.

"8. Happily for Wolfowitz, Osama bin Laden releases a videotape claiming responsibility, warning America not to attack his 'brave warriors' in Iran.

"9. American fighters launch a 'decapitation' attack on the Iranian government and alleged 'al-Qaeda' bases."
(End of quote)

I've seen many dire predictions like this over the past 45 years and none of them have come true. Think of all the false predictions around Y2K. I think if one prediction came true tomorrow I would just figure it was time for a fluke of luck.

The problem is that when there is a calamity people like the false prophet above will point the finger of blame at our own government whether it is guilty or not.
 

medicineman

New Member
And then there are the conspiracies that are proven time and again. Conspiracy theorists keep the level of suspicion on any major event, sometimes they are proven right, most time not, but they are generally not proven wrong either. Take the Kennedy assassination, no matter how many times the government tries to say it was only the work of one man, conspiracy theorists like myself will not believe it. In fact the last time I saw the governments new take on the JFK assassination, they skipped the zapruder films showing of the fatal head shot that took the "front of his head off, snapped his head to the rear and killed him, taking part of his skull and brains onto the trunk of the car. How convenient when trying to prove the shot came from the rear. It's revisionist history like this that only proves to me they are hiding something.
 

jfgordon1

Well-Known Member
And then there are the conspiracies that are proven time and again. Conspiracy theorists keep the level of suspicion on any major event, sometimes they are proven right, most time not, but they are generally not proven wrong either. Take the Kennedy assassination, no matter how many times the government tries to say it was only the work of one man, conspiracy theorists like myself will not believe it. In fact the last time I saw the governments new take on the JFK assassination, they skipped the zapruder films showing of the fatal head shot that took the "front of his head off, snapped his head to the rear and killed him, taking part of his skull and brains onto the trunk of the car. How convenient when trying to prove the shot came from the rear. It's revisionist history like this that only proves to me they are hiding something.
im with you on this one man. i love conspiracies. Gov't is hiding something on jfk ( the magic bullet) , 9/11, and even elections.... i don't trust politicians :spew:

its all about the all might $ :evil:
 

Big P

Well-Known Member
i always thought LBJ had his hands in the Kennedy assasination



but then i watched the mythbuster episode where they made exact replica of the shooting with a sharp shooter and book depository moving car exact everything to an inch including rifle bullets everything


well funny enough they even used human ballistics dummies and low and behold the stinkin magic bullet did the same exact thing as it did in the real assaniation finally lodging in the front seat dudes wrist



seems its true 1 guy shot him
 

TheBrutalTruth

Well-Known Member
i always thought LBJ had his hands in the Kennedy assasination



but then i watched the mythbuster episode where they made exact replica of the shooting with a sharp shooter and book depository moving car exact everything to an inch including rifle bullets everything


well funny enough they even used human ballistics dummies and low and behold the stinkin magic bullet did the same exact thing as it did in the real assaniation finally lodging in the front seat dudes wrist



seems its true 1 guy shot him
Weird freaky random chance...

Wish I could have seen the episode though. Sounds like it would have been interesting to see how the magic bullet was explained.

Of course, there are things that no one would be capable of knowing with out actually talking to Lee Harvey Oswald.

It's too bad he was so conveniently killed by Jack Ruby before he could be thoroughly interrogated, and before Hollywood could have rushed to give him a movie deal, and before some publishing firm could have given him a book deal....
 

Jointsmith

Well-Known Member
B.., Your Ignorant and offensive way of spelling MUSLIM shows you are not as clued up on the world as you seem to think you are.

Unless you're a Bigot that is.
 

Jointsmith

Well-Known Member
In fact re-reading some other parts of your post I can see that you are obviously subscribed to the Bush Doctrine and 'Spreading democracy (corperate rule) to the world'.

People look for conspiracies because the information being provided is flawed/doesn't add up.

Take 9/11 for example (the only 'conspiracy theory' I really subscribe to), people haven't searched out evidence for a conspiracy theory, people have only pointed out the GLARING INCONSISTENCIES with the official record of what happened.

I have a question....what percentage of people believed communist 'terrorists' burned down the Reichstag?

And as for the 'Disaffected Muslim Conspiracy'.....if The American Military was an occupying force in MY coutry, I'd be killing as many of you as I possibly could, any way I could find.

The French resistance during WW2, terrorists or freedom fighters?
 

GrowRebel

Well-Known Member
What's good about it ... with so much bad info?

Why is it so hard to believe that 911 was caused by terrorists especially in the face of the fact that Osama Bin Laden admitted that he was the mastermind?[/qupte]
Wrong ... Bin Laden never admitted he was the mastermind ... even the at the FBI web site 911 is NOT listed as one of his crimes ... why is that?

Then with this lasted terrorist act in London it was only days before conspiracy theories started to fly. G8 leaders (including Bush), bankers and others must have been involved.

Let's take a look at this last one. They have a tremendous amount of photographic and other hard evidence of who was involved. They have in custody a number of the perpetrators and they are talking. In the face of all this just imagine how lucky conspirators would have had to have been to pull this off.

They would have had to execute the plan so flawlessly that the press wouldn't have been able to pick up a trail. The press throughout the world hates Bush and if they could pin anything like this on him or other G8 leaders they would.

Thousands of police are investigating. Somehow the conspirators would have had to cover all their tracks so perfectly that none could follow leads to them.

They may say that those who executed the attack were lower level dupes, but so many were involved that it would only be a matter of time before someone would talk and expose the conspiracy.
Plenty of unanswered questions concerning this event ... that this yah hoo hasn't addressed ... I'm more concern with 911 rather than presenting evidence of the government(s) involvement ...

Now let us get back to the question as to why conspiracy is seen in so many places?
Um ... because of government cover-up? :roll:

The answer is you find what you are looking for and if you suspect a conspiracy and look for it you will find evidence.
Ah ... no ... I don't think so ...

1. The theorist likes to see himself as more intelligent than the crowd and to see beyond what appears to be obvious is one way to affirm this. The trouble is that so many people are swallowing conspiracy these days that the effect is the opposite. Today the conspiracy theorist often goes along with the crowd.
2. The theorist is often anti authority and looks for sinister motives within the powers that be.
3. The theorist is often an intellectual with good powers of observation and loves the game of using his mind to see cause beyond the obvious cause. It's a little like seeing the face of Jesus in an ink blot. It's kind of a fun intellectual exercise.
4. The theorist often has a theological belief system that needs a conspiracy involved to make all the pieces fit.
5. There is a particular person in power (like Bush or Clinton) that the theorists just hates and is happy to blame for the world's problems.
6. he theorist is often having a tough life and instead of taking responsibility for it he blames it on the bankers, politicians or whoever working behind the scenes to desecrate his life.

Most conspiracy people are barely surviving financially.
Oh ... so heads of state and former CIA agents ...MP's ... organizations ... other governments ... that say 911 is an inside job ... just need some doe ... wow ... I'm so glad I have this asshole to tell me these things!:dunce:



"8. Happily for Wolfowitz, Osama bin Laden releases a videotape claiming responsibility, warning America not to attack his 'brave warriors' in Iran.
You mean that FAKE video Rove put out that doesn't even look like Bin Laden ...
Folks ... it's pretty obvious this guy is blowing it out his ass ...he has so much false bull shit I don't have time to point it all out ... but he's definitely full of shit if you take the time to look over his propaganda ... you will see for yourselves ... probably works for the government ... kiss-ass

i always thought LBJ had his hands in the Kennedy assasination
Your first thought was correct ... the show was wrong ... :-|
 

Big P

Well-Known Member
What's good about it ... with so much bad info?


Oh ... so heads of state and former CIA agents ...MP's ... organizations ... other governments ... that say 911 is an inside job ... just need some doe ... wow ... I'm so glad I have this asshole to tell me these things!:dunce:




You mean that FAKE video Rove put out that doesn't even look like Bin Laden ...
Folks ... it's pretty obvious this guy is blowing it out his ass ...he has so much false bull shit I don't have time to point it all out ... but he's definitely full of shit if you take the time to look over his propaganda ... you will see for yourselves ... probably works for the government ... kiss-ass



Your first thought was correct ... the show was wrong ... :-|

Rebel you didnt even see the show. Ill let all you guys know right now how surprised everyone was when the Magic bullet thing was turned out "Plausable"


Oh by the way the whole roswell incident. Was a secrect project where the US government used weather baloons highly sophoticated to detect Nucleur detonations all over the world.

So then you say how Do i explain the Heiroglyphs on parts of the wreckage.


well turns out the source of the shapes was cuz they had to use a toy company to produce some of the balsa wood used in the ballons but when the toy company started running out they began to use wood for toys that have differnet shapes and designs on them

they said these designs bled out into the fabric

but for sure some asshole retarded uneducated farmer in the middle of the desert back in the dark misinformed days of the 1940's finds a peice of tin foil with some strange shapes on it, tells some airforce dip, he tells the media, then the airforce is like u moron this is part from our top secret project. and they try to quel by saying its a weather ballon


anyway my point is how many of these below points describe you: everyone pls put a yes or a no next to each one ill start:

There are several reasons why conspiracies are looked for. Here are a few:

1. The theorist likes to see himself as more intelligent than the crowd and to see beyond what appears to be obvious is one way to affirm this. The trouble is that so many people are swallowing conspiracy these days that the effect is the opposite. Today the conspiracy theorist often goes along with the crowd. Yes for the first part for me

2. The theorist is often anti authority and looks for sinister motives within the powers that be. Yes

3. The theorist is often an intellectual with good powers of observation and loves the game of using his mind to see cause beyond the obvious cause. It's a little like seeing the face of Jesus in an ink blot. It's kind of a fun intellectual exercise. No

4. The theorist often has a theological belief system that needs a conspiracy involved to make all the pieces fit. No

5. There is a particular person in power (like Bush or Clinton) that the theorists just hates and is happy to blame for the world's problems. No

6. the theorist is often having a tough life and instead of taking
responsibility for it he blames it on the bankers, politicians or whoever working behind the scenes to desecrate his life. No



ok guys your turn just for fun, answer them truthfully as i have done to see if its true that conspirocy theorists tend to have the above affinities


 

medicineman

New Member
I don't need to see the show ... the magic bullet theory is bullshit ... Johnson was a war criminal ... he had everything to gain by Kennedy death ... follow the money ... :-|
In that show, they failed to show the zapruder shot of the front of his head flying off to the rear and landing on the trunk of the car, an obvious frontal shot. Revisionist history in the making. And Big P bought it hook line and sinker.
 

Big P

Well-Known Member
In that show, they failed to show the zapruder shot of the front of his head flying off to the rear and landing on the trunk of the car, an obvious frontal shot. Revisionist history in the making. And Big P bought it hook line and sinker.

how come u guys dont asnwer the above questions? to see if you are prone to be conspirocy theorists

as far as buying things hook line and sinker, that eposide "plausable"


if a scientically accurate re-enactment doesn't atleast quell your doubts then nothing will,


why dont you guys answer these questions truthfully I did,:weed:


There are several reasons why conspiracies are looked for. Here are a few:

1. The theorist likes to see himself as more intelligent than the crowd and to see beyond what appears to be obvious is one way to affirm this. The trouble is that so many people are swallowing conspiracy these days that the effect is the opposite. Today the conspiracy theorist often goes along with the crowd. Yes for the first part for me

2. The theorist is often anti authority and looks for sinister motives within the powers that be. Yes

3. The theorist is often an intellectual with good powers of observation and loves the game of using his mind to see cause beyond the obvious cause. It's a little like seeing the face of Jesus in an ink blot. It's kind of a fun intellectual exercise. No

4. The theorist often has a theological belief system that needs a conspiracy involved to make all the pieces fit. No

5. There is a particular person in power (like Bush or Clinton) that the theorists just hates and is happy to blame for the world's problems. No

6. the theorist is often having a tough life and instead of taking
responsibility for it he blames it on the bankers, politicians or whoever working behind the scenes to desecrate his life. No
 

Jointsmith

Well-Known Member
how come u guys dont asnwer the above questions? to see if you are prone to be conspirocy theorists

as far as buying things hook line and sinker, that eposide "plausable"


if a scientically accurate re-enactment doesn't atleast quell your doubts then nothing will,


why dont you guys answer these questions truthfully I did,:weed:


There are several reasons why conspiracies are looked for. Here are a few:

1. The theorist likes to see himself as more intelligent than the crowd and to see beyond what appears to be obvious is one way to affirm this. The trouble is that so many people are swallowing conspiracy these days that the effect is the opposite. Today the conspiracy theorist often goes along with the crowd. Yes for the first part for me

2. The theorist is often anti authority and looks for sinister motives within the powers that be. Yes

3. The theorist is often an intellectual with good powers of observation and loves the game of using his mind to see cause beyond the obvious cause. It's a little like seeing the face of Jesus in an ink blot. It's kind of a fun intellectual exercise. No

4. The theorist often has a theological belief system that needs a conspiracy involved to make all the pieces fit. No

5. There is a particular person in power (like Bush or Clinton) that the theorists just hates and is happy to blame for the world's problems. No

6. the theorist is often having a tough life and instead of taking
responsibility for it he blames it on the bankers, politicians or whoever working behind the scenes to desecrate his life. No
I'd have answered the same way you have.... but I don't consider myself a conspiracy theorist.

I don't think Bankers/politicians/whoever are 'working behind the scenes to desecrate my life', however I do believe that they are 'working behind the scene's to further their own wealth and power' and will exploit ANYONE necissary to do this.

What everyone needs to understand is that conspiracy or not, there are powers at work who DONT GIVE A FUCK ABOUT YOU, only keeping control, wealth and power.

If we the people want the power back, we're going to have to take it.

More and more people are becoming 'Intellegent Outlaws' and waking up to the truth of the world, which is that we are going to have to fight to be free.
 

medicineman

New Member
I'd have answered the same way you have.... but I don't consider myself a conspiracy theorist.

I don't think Bankers/politicians/whoever are 'working behind the scenes to desecrate my life', however I do believe that they are 'working behind the scene's to further their own wealth and power' and will exploit ANYONE necissary to do this.

What everyone needs to understand is that conspiracy or not, there are powers at work who DONT GIVE A FUCK ABOUT YOU, only keeping control, wealth and power.

If we the people want the power back, we're going to have to take it.

More and more people are becoming 'Intellegent Outlaws' and waking up to the truth of the world, which is that we are going to have to fight to be free.
We are outgunned so much it's pathetic. Without an inside coup, the military on our side, we can never escape the clutches of the rich and powerful. Thry are kings and we are the pawns. I'll defend my family against agression to the death, but don't ask me to take my AK to a fight against attack helos, cluster bombs and napalm.
 

Jointsmith

Well-Known Member
We are outgunned so much it's pathetic. Without an inside coup, the military on our side, we can never escape the clutches of the rich and powerful. Thry are kings and we are the pawns. I'll defend my family against agression to the death, but don't ask me to take my AK to a fight against attack helos, cluster bombs and napalm.
They are Kings as long as we let them rule us.... The resolution to this isn't through violence but through a Social change in conscience.

A lot of the power they hold over us we have GIVEN to them volentarily, remove the money and you remove their strangle hold.

Stop Buy Oil.
Stop watching shitty TV.
Stop shopping at Walmart.
Stop buying things on Credit.

When we stop looking to the super rich elite for solutions to problems that DON'T EXIST, they will have no power over us.
 
Top