Why America Must Prosecute War Crimes

GrowRebel

Well-Known Member
You should always stand by your country.
Not when it commits war crimes ... and to not speak out would be wrong.

Yeah it may have made mistakes but we supported them.
Not when it commits war crimes ... you would have to be a pretty low life to support war criminals ...

maybe not as individuals but collaboratively as a whole it is all of america who is fucked up. Doesnt really matter on the greater scheme of things tho I mean torture is nothing new it is just unheard of for news of it to leave the hole under a building in Guatemala. check this out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torture_and_the_United_States totrure has a long history, probably since the beginning of man. Human nature is blind and evil.
Just because it's been around for a long time doesn't make it right ... :sleep:
 

CrackerJax

New Member
Guys, can you please give me the address of Al Queda's prison for captured combatants?

I mean we have Gitmo....and they have ???? what?


out. :blsmoke:
 

CrackerJax

New Member
My worthless point is.... when one side plays but the rules and the other doesn't....the other side (terrorism) will ultimately triumph. Way to help out the terrorists GR!! :clap:

Did you see where the U.N. is suspending aid because hamas is confiscating it instead of letting it flow to their own people freely? Wonderful people....your friends GR... ur friends.


out. :blsmoke:
 

GrowRebel

Well-Known Member
And what will you do when they aren't any terrorist attacks? What will you do when your wish doesn't come through?:evil::twisted:
...out :razz:
 

CrackerJax

New Member
Yes, that 9/10 mentality is such a realistic one given the state of the world. One could be given a pass before 9/11, but now it just sounds foolish....and dangerous. How dangerous will it become? We will find out together I'm afraid.

Of course, you may have been lulled into thinking it can't happen again because George Bush has kept you safe from home front attacks. I'm no big fan of George Bush but he kept his word. He kept us safe, but George has left the building and we now have an inane Dem congress followed up by an appeasement based President. So how dangerous will it get? Very..... Let's just wish it away..... isn't that how it works? :lol: oh my....


out. :blsmoke:
 

GrowRebel

Well-Known Member
Yes, that 9/10 mentality is such a realistic one given the state of the world. One could be given a pass before 9/11, but now it just sounds foolish....and dangerous. How dangerous will it become? We will find out together I'm afraid.
No ... it's a mentality that the government was behind 911 ... how dangerous will it become? ... that depends on how many PNAC members are in a position of power ... yeah ... we will find out together ... that the elite in PNAC is the only thing to fear ...

Of course, you may have been lulled into thinking it can't happen again because George Bush has kept you safe from home front attacks.
No ... I know it can't happen again ... because the bush crime family is no longer in the WH .... to plant bombs in buildings and make impossible claims that fire brought them down ... or they won't be there to have NORAD stand down ... that's why I don't worry about another flase flag attack ... he didn't keep us safe ... they just didn't do another false flag attack here in the states ... nothing more ...

I'm no big fan of George Bush but he kept his word.
Yeah you are ... kiss-ass What? ... did he promise you he wouldn't participate in another false flag attack?

He kept us safe, but George has left the building
No he didn't ... he allowed a false flag attack on american soil ...

and we now have an inane Dem congress followed up by an appeasement based President.
Yeah ... we have a legitimate ... intelligent president for a change ...someone that can actually read and write! ... after 8 long years ... that must really shake the bushwhacked minded ...

So how dangerous will it get?
Like I said ... that depends on how many PNAC members are still in power ... I don't think there are enough of them to pull off another 911 false flag operation ...

Very..... Let's just wish it away..... isn't that how it works? :lol: oh my....
out. :blsmoke:
Naw ... you what to wish it on ... so you can feel like you are right for a change ... but as usual you are wrong ... Your type love to feed on fear and hate ... that's how it works ... what will you do with no false flag attacks in the states to support your fear mongering?:neutral: You poor SOB ...

out
:roll:
 

Attachments

GrowRebel

Well-Known Member
Countdown: Special Comment on Dick Cheney's Remarks About a Future Terrorist Attack in the U.S.
[youtube]M9VYoJVWDx0[/youtube]

... and note folks at home ... it was the bush crime family that released those prisoners the neocons and bushwhack keep bitching about ... Olbermann makes some excellent points that the bushwhack completely ignores ... they want to blame Obama ... but it's the bush crime family ... as usual ... that shows you just how stupid the bushwhacked are ... :dunce:
bongsmilie:eyesmoke:
 

GrowRebel

Well-Known Member
You are way down deep in the rabbit hole of conspiracies aren't you? :lol: Oh my.... seen any UFO's lately?


out. :blsmoke:
Nope ... but you are way down deep in the rabbit hole of denial aren't you? In your bushwhacked mind it's a conspiracy when the government can't and won't answer questions ... it's a conspiracy when there are great inconsistencies in the official cover-up story ... in other words a "conspiracy" as the bushwhack love to call it ... is now the euphemism for disregarding the obvious ...:roll:

yep ... seen a UFO today ... and the occupants told me to tell you are a bushwhacked dumbass ... kiss-assout :razz:
 

medicineman

New Member
You see, there's the rub. If one has ever seen a UFO, they are automaticly branded a conspiracy nutcase. I guess the nomenclature of UFO (Unidentified flying object) doesn't ring any bells. When I was on sabatical in the AZ desert, I saw a few UFOs. Can't tell anyone what they were because they were UNIDENTIFIED. Now if I could have Identified them, they wouldn't be UFOs, now would they. I mean they were objects in the sky (Flying) and I couldn't tell what they were, hence.......UFOs. I can spot an airplane, a hot air balloon, a helicopter, a rocket, the moon and a few other objects in the sky sometimes. These were none of those. Maybe that's one reason I liked Dennis Kucinich, he wasn't afraid to tell it like he saw it.
 

CrackerJax

New Member
So even tho I didn't vote for him, i'm a Bushie huh... :lol: How about I just have economic horse sense and you do not. I think that is far far more probable.

yes, med man if you think you have seen a UFO 'alien" ship :lol: lawdy.... ur a whacko of the first order. Unless you can bring irrevocable proof with your claims, then you are on the front page of every newspaper in the world. NO? Which part is incorrect? :lol:

Something which is unidentified is simply that, no more. It's the leap to extraterrestials is where you have left the farm. It is exactly these type of people who ignore the probabilities which have the commonality of you and your poltical ilk. You just want what you want regardless of the economic data which exposes your huge flaws in policy. You simply ignore them and forge blindly ahead using Machievellian reasoning. Case in point is the HIDEOUS ENTIGHTLEMENT BILL just now pulsing thru the Congress. Never mind that most any economist calls it an abortion of the highest order. Never mind that no republicans were utilized in authoring or contributing to the bill (thank G*D), despite all the Obama campaign RHETORIC.

Lawdy.... how many Rabbits can you fit down in your hole?


out. :blsmoke:
 

GrowRebel

Well-Known Member
Turley has it right ... if these war criminals are not prosecuted ... it will become our crime as well. A special commission is nothing more than special justice ...
KO Countdown : Bush 090210 : Truth
[youtube]wdVTRmR7ezw[/youtube]
Last night on Countdown, Keith Olbermann talked to Jonathan Turley about the possibility of a Truth Commission and his strong opposition to it and his feelings that it is just a way to make sure no one is prosecuted for war crimes in the Bush administration.


Truth and Consequences - Rachel Maddow interviews Patrick Leahy 02-10-09

[youtube]beJSd4wmiYg[/youtube]

Rachel followed with an interview with Pat Leahy where he leaves open the possibility of prosecutions if anyone either refuses to testify, lies under oath, or doesn't fully disclose what they know during that testimony.


Leahy has no intentions what so ever of prosecuting these war criminals ... it would implicate him and his friends ... that's why he wants this phoney baloney "truth commission" ... so we will shut up about it while they sweep it under the rug! NOT:cuss:
 

We Love 1

New Member
Keep up the good work GrowRebel!

To anyone that doesn't believe 911 was an inside job, please explain how WTC 7 fell down like a ton of bricks at freefall speed?

"Pull it" and it came crashing down from the explosives. Boom boom boom boom, right into its own pretty little footprint.

:lol:
 

CrackerJax

New Member
Keep up the good work GrowRebel!

To anyone that doesn't believe 911 was an inside job, please explain how WTC 7 fell down like a ton of bricks at freefall speed?

"Pull it" and it came crashing down from the explosives. Boom boom boom boom, right into its own pretty little footprint.

:lol:

it's called gravity.


out. :blsmoke:
 

GrowRebel

Well-Known Member
The reason it is completely foolish to do this, especially in public is.....
out. :blsmoke:
Yes ... well ... we all know the bushwhacked minded don't believe in prosecuting war criminals ... nothing new here ...
out:dunce:


it's called gravity.
out. :blsmoke:
It's called your a complete and total idiot ...
out ...:roll:
... folks pretty obvious this one can't handle the truth ... but who cares? Idiots aren't very helpful anyway.:bigjoint:
 

medicineman

New Member
Jeeze jax, seems like your "Opinions" don't really hold any more water than those you so freely lable as conspiracy nuts. Example: Having never seen a UFO, how in the hell could you positively say they don't exist. That would be akin to saying, having never seen Niagra Falls, they don't exist. Thousands of people have seen UFOs just as thousands have seen Niagra Falls. I havent seen Niagra and obvioulsy, you havent seen a UFO. The difference is I'll, admit Niagra Falls exist because I've been told they do, and you won't accept UFOs even though thousands, perhaps millions have seen them and explained what they saw. In this day and age to suppose that there is not other intelligent life in the universe, (I'ts a pretty large place) is nigh on to surpassing ignorance and progressing directly into stupidity.
 

CrackerJax

New Member
Yes ... well ... we all know the bushwhacked minded don't believe in prosecuting war criminals ... nothing new here ...
out:dunce:



It's called your a complete and total idiot ...
out ...:roll:
... folks pretty obvious this one can't handle the truth ... but who cares? Idiots aren't very helpful anyway.:bigjoint:
You cannot prove your case and yet you take the high moral ground. You sir are the nutty one, not I.

Your entire premise is so convoluted when compared to the simple truth of the matter. Now I know you believe in UFO's... it's that obvious.


out. :blsmoke:

out. :blsmoke:
 
Top