Jointsmith
Well-Known Member
Money is the motive for most crimes.
Why America Must Prosecute War Crimes
- Thread starter GrowRebel
- Start date
GrowRebel
Well-Known Member
Not when it commits war crimes ... and to not speak out would be wrong.
Not when it commits war crimes ... you would have to be a pretty low life to support war criminals ...
Just because it's been around for a long time doesn't make it right ...
CrackerJax
New Member
Guys, can you please give me the address of Al Queda's prison for captured combatants?
I mean we have Gitmo....and they have ???? what?
out.
I mean we have Gitmo....and they have ???? what?
out.
GrowRebel
Well-Known Member
... and your worthless point is?Guys, can you please give me the address of Al Queda's prison for captured combatants?
I mean we have Gitmo....and they have ???? what?
out.
CrackerJax
New Member
My worthless point is.... when one side plays but the rules and the other doesn't....the other side (terrorism) will ultimately triumph. Way to help out the terrorists GR!! 
Did you see where the U.N. is suspending aid because hamas is confiscating it instead of letting it flow to their own people freely? Wonderful people....your friends GR... ur friends.
out.
Did you see where the U.N. is suspending aid because hamas is confiscating it instead of letting it flow to their own people freely? Wonderful people....your friends GR... ur friends.
out.
CrackerJax
New Member
Yes, that 9/10 mentality is such a realistic one given the state of the world. One could be given a pass before 9/11, but now it just sounds foolish....and dangerous. How dangerous will it become? We will find out together I'm afraid.
Of course, you may have been lulled into thinking it can't happen again because George Bush has kept you safe from home front attacks. I'm no big fan of George Bush but he kept his word. He kept us safe, but George has left the building and we now have an inane Dem congress followed up by an appeasement based President. So how dangerous will it get? Very..... Let's just wish it away..... isn't that how it works?
oh my....
out.
Of course, you may have been lulled into thinking it can't happen again because George Bush has kept you safe from home front attacks. I'm no big fan of George Bush but he kept his word. He kept us safe, but George has left the building and we now have an inane Dem congress followed up by an appeasement based President. So how dangerous will it get? Very..... Let's just wish it away..... isn't that how it works?
oh my....out.
GrowRebel
Well-Known Member
No ... it's a mentality that the government was behind 911 ... how dangerous will it become? ... that depends on how many PNAC members are in a position of power ... yeah ... we will find out together ... that the elite in PNAC is the only thing to fear ...
No ... I know it can't happen again ... because the bush crime family is no longer in the WH .... to plant bombs in buildings and make impossible claims that fire brought them down ... or they won't be there to have NORAD stand down ... that's why I don't worry about another flase flag attack ... he didn't keep us safe ... they just didn't do another false flag attack here in the states ... nothing more ...
Yeah you are ... kiss-ass What? ... did he promise you he wouldn't participate in another false flag attack?
No he didn't ... he allowed a false flag attack on american soil ...
Yeah ... we have a legitimate ... intelligent president for a change ...someone that can actually read and write! ... after 8 long years ... that must really shake the bushwhacked minded ...
Like I said ... that depends on how many PNAC members are still in power ... I don't think there are enough of them to pull off another 911 false flag operation ...
Naw ... you what to wish it on ... so you can feel like you are right for a change ... but as usual you are wrong ... Your type love to feed on fear and hate ... that's how it works ... what will you do with no false flag attacks in the states to support your fear mongering?Very..... Let's just wish it away..... isn't that how it works?
out.
You poor SOB ... out
Attachments
GrowRebel
Well-Known Member
Countdown: Special Comment on Dick Cheney's Remarks About a Future Terrorist Attack in the U.S.
[youtube]M9VYoJVWDx0[/youtube]
... and note folks at home ... it was the bush crime family that released those prisoners the neocons and bushwhack keep bitching about ... Olbermann makes some excellent points that the bushwhack completely ignores ... they want to blame Obama ... but it's the bush crime family ... as usual ... that shows you just how stupid the bushwhacked are ...
[youtube]M9VYoJVWDx0[/youtube]
... and note folks at home ... it was the bush crime family that released those prisoners the neocons and bushwhack keep bitching about ... Olbermann makes some excellent points that the bushwhack completely ignores ... they want to blame Obama ... but it's the bush crime family ... as usual ... that shows you just how stupid the bushwhacked are ...
CrackerJax
New Member
You are way down deep in the rabbit hole of conspiracies aren't you? Oh my.... seen any UFO's lately?
out.
Oh my.... seen any UFO's lately? out.
GrowRebel
Well-Known Member
Nope ... but you are way down deep in the rabbit hole of denial aren't you? In your bushwhacked mind it's a conspiracy when the government can't and won't answer questions ... it's a conspiracy when there are great inconsistencies in the official cover-up story ... in other words a "conspiracy" as the bushwhack love to call it ... is now the euphemism for disregarding the obvious ...You are way down deep in the rabbit hole of conspiracies aren't you?
out.
yep ... seen a UFO today ... and the occupants told me to tell you are a bushwhacked dumbass ... kiss-assout
medicineman
New Member
You see, there's the rub. If one has ever seen a UFO, they are automaticly branded a conspiracy nutcase. I guess the nomenclature of UFO (Unidentified flying object) doesn't ring any bells. When I was on sabatical in the AZ desert, I saw a few UFOs. Can't tell anyone what they were because they were UNIDENTIFIED. Now if I could have Identified them, they wouldn't be UFOs, now would they. I mean they were objects in the sky (Flying) and I couldn't tell what they were, hence.......UFOs. I can spot an airplane, a hot air balloon, a helicopter, a rocket, the moon and a few other objects in the sky sometimes. These were none of those. Maybe that's one reason I liked Dennis Kucinich, he wasn't afraid to tell it like he saw it.
CrackerJax
New Member
So even tho I didn't vote for him, i'm a Bushie huh... How about I just have economic horse sense and you do not. I think that is far far more probable.
yes, med man if you think you have seen a UFO 'alien" ship lawdy.... ur a whacko of the first order. Unless you can bring irrevocable proof with your claims, then you are on the front page of every newspaper in the world. NO? Which part is incorrect?
Something which is unidentified is simply that, no more. It's the leap to extraterrestials is where you have left the farm. It is exactly these type of people who ignore the probabilities which have the commonality of you and your poltical ilk. You just want what you want regardless of the economic data which exposes your huge flaws in policy. You simply ignore them and forge blindly ahead using Machievellian reasoning. Case in point is the HIDEOUS ENTIGHTLEMENT BILL just now pulsing thru the Congress. Never mind that most any economist calls it an abortion of the highest order. Never mind that no republicans were utilized in authoring or contributing to the bill (thank G*D), despite all the Obama campaign RHETORIC.
Lawdy.... how many Rabbits can you fit down in your hole?
out.
How about I just have economic horse sense and you do not. I think that is far far more probable.yes, med man if you think you have seen a UFO 'alien" ship
lawdy.... ur a whacko of the first order. Unless you can bring irrevocable proof with your claims, then you are on the front page of every newspaper in the world. NO? Which part is incorrect? Something which is unidentified is simply that, no more. It's the leap to extraterrestials is where you have left the farm. It is exactly these type of people who ignore the probabilities which have the commonality of you and your poltical ilk. You just want what you want regardless of the economic data which exposes your huge flaws in policy. You simply ignore them and forge blindly ahead using Machievellian reasoning. Case in point is the HIDEOUS ENTIGHTLEMENT BILL just now pulsing thru the Congress. Never mind that most any economist calls it an abortion of the highest order. Never mind that no republicans were utilized in authoring or contributing to the bill (thank G*D), despite all the Obama campaign RHETORIC.
Lawdy.... how many Rabbits can you fit down in your hole?
out.
GrowRebel
Well-Known Member
Turley has it right ... if these war criminals are not prosecuted ... it will become our crime as well. A special commission is nothing more than special justice ...
KO Countdown : Bush 090210 : Truth
[youtube]wdVTRmR7ezw[/youtube]
Last night on Countdown, Keith Olbermann talked to Jonathan Turley about the possibility of a Truth Commission and his strong opposition to it and his feelings that it is just a way to make sure no one is prosecuted for war crimes in the Bush administration.
Truth and Consequences - Rachel Maddow interviews Patrick Leahy 02-10-09
[youtube]beJSd4wmiYg[/youtube]
Rachel followed with an interview with Pat Leahy where he leaves open the possibility of prosecutions if anyone either refuses to testify, lies under oath, or doesn't fully disclose what they know during that testimony.
Leahy has no intentions what so ever of prosecuting these war criminals ... it would implicate him and his friends ... that's why he wants this phoney baloney "truth commission" ... so we will shut up about it while they sweep it under the rug! NOT
KO Countdown : Bush 090210 : Truth
[youtube]wdVTRmR7ezw[/youtube]
Last night on Countdown, Keith Olbermann talked to Jonathan Turley about the possibility of a Truth Commission and his strong opposition to it and his feelings that it is just a way to make sure no one is prosecuted for war crimes in the Bush administration.
Truth and Consequences - Rachel Maddow interviews Patrick Leahy 02-10-09
[youtube]beJSd4wmiYg[/youtube]
Rachel followed with an interview with Pat Leahy where he leaves open the possibility of prosecutions if anyone either refuses to testify, lies under oath, or doesn't fully disclose what they know during that testimony.
Leahy has no intentions what so ever of prosecuting these war criminals ... it would implicate him and his friends ... that's why he wants this phoney baloney "truth commission" ... so we will shut up about it while they sweep it under the rug! NOT
CrackerJax
New Member
The reason it is completely foolish to do this, especially in public is.....
out.
out.
Keep up the good work GrowRebel!
To anyone that doesn't believe 911 was an inside job, please explain how WTC 7 fell down like a ton of bricks at freefall speed?
"Pull it" and it came crashing down from the explosives. Boom boom boom boom, right into its own pretty little footprint.
To anyone that doesn't believe 911 was an inside job, please explain how WTC 7 fell down like a ton of bricks at freefall speed?
"Pull it" and it came crashing down from the explosives. Boom boom boom boom, right into its own pretty little footprint.
CrackerJax
New Member
Keep up the good work GrowRebel!
To anyone that doesn't believe 911 was an inside job, please explain how WTC 7 fell down like a ton of bricks at freefall speed?
"Pull it" and it came crashing down from the explosives. Boom boom boom boom, right into its own pretty little footprint.
it's called gravity.
out.
GrowRebel
Well-Known Member
Yes ... well ... we all know the bushwhacked minded don't believe in prosecuting war criminals ... nothing new here ...The reason it is completely foolish to do this, especially in public is.....
out.
out
It's called your a complete and total idiot ...it's called gravity.
out.
out ...
... folks pretty obvious this one can't handle the truth ... but who cares? Idiots aren't very helpful anyway.
medicineman
New Member
Jeeze jax, seems like your "Opinions" don't really hold any more water than those you so freely lable as conspiracy nuts. Example: Having never seen a UFO, how in the hell could you positively say they don't exist. That would be akin to saying, having never seen Niagra Falls, they don't exist. Thousands of people have seen UFOs just as thousands have seen Niagra Falls. I havent seen Niagra and obvioulsy, you havent seen a UFO. The difference is I'll, admit Niagra Falls exist because I've been told they do, and you won't accept UFOs even though thousands, perhaps millions have seen them and explained what they saw. In this day and age to suppose that there is not other intelligent life in the universe, (I'ts a pretty large place) is nigh on to surpassing ignorance and progressing directly into stupidity.
CrackerJax
New Member
You cannot prove your case and yet you take the high moral ground. You sir are the nutty one, not I.Yes ... well ... we all know the bushwhacked minded don't believe in prosecuting war criminals ... nothing new here ...
out
It's called your a complete and total idiot ...
out ...
... folks pretty obvious this one can't handle the truth ... but who cares? Idiots aren't very helpful anyway.
Your entire premise is so convoluted when compared to the simple truth of the matter. Now I know you believe in UFO's... it's that obvious.
out.
out.