ruderalis88
Well-Known Member
I don't want to get into this 'whether the US should be in Afghanistan or not' deal, but to hark back to the original post, those CIA members died because they went to war. That's what happens in wars, opposing sides attack each other and try to cause more deaths than they concede. I don't approve of the situation, but getting upset because some of the military die is logically the same as running across a busy road blindfolded and then getting upset if you get hit by a car.
The thing that scunners me is that the bomber just walked into the base, he was supposedly 'on side' with the Americans but clearly defected. Why has the intelligence been so poor recently?
For what it's worth, I believe that both sides in this war are wrong.
The deaths of those American CIA agents who died, in terms of grief and sorrow, are not more valuable than the lives of the Taliban or whoever else America has killed. It's a war. You go to war, you might get killed. That's how it works.
The thing that scunners me is that the bomber just walked into the base, he was supposedly 'on side' with the Americans but clearly defected. Why has the intelligence been so poor recently?
For what it's worth, I believe that both sides in this war are wrong.
The deaths of those American CIA agents who died, in terms of grief and sorrow, are not more valuable than the lives of the Taliban or whoever else America has killed. It's a war. You go to war, you might get killed. That's how it works.