Voting Against Prop 19 means :

Status
Not open for further replies.

vertise

Well-Known Member
So your opinion of someones need for MMJ should mean more than a doctors?

(What does this even mean. You are saying that someones need for medical marijuana should mean more then a doctors need for mmj)

What kind of jobs are you refering to? Your words are vague, trying to evoke sympathy for some non-existant people you just made up...and how the heck are the white collar types more affected than blue?

(Any and all company's can legaly deny ANY marijuana user a job. Medicinal or not. However, under prop 19, in order to deny a marijuana user employment the employer must accurately prove his/her use of weed will affect performance. Which tech cannot be done until that person performs such job. )

This makes absolutely no sense, and you probably cant establish this with any credibility. And yes, this is ALL ABOUT THE WEED. If it wasn't why are you here?

(Not all about weed, i do not know if you are responding to something i said on another thread. The voters that make up most of the yes' are most likely none growers. The bill is the perfect compromise for growers/smoker/none marijuana users. Try thinking of a bill that would be supported by all different mindsets. Not just yours.)
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
Not where I am, they go for 100 renewal and 150 for newbs. Either way, if you are a poor or on the street without a proper ID, it's kinda hard to get a rec. The people washing our dishes and picking our food should get to smoke too.
how are they going to pay for it? :roll:
 

Needofweed

Active Member
Not where I am, they go for 100 renewal and 150 for newbs. Either way, if you are a poor or on the street without a proper ID, it's kinda hard to get a rec. The people washing our dishes and picking our food should get to smoke too.
But if someone is poor or sick then more than likely they got Medi-Cal wich will pay for a large portion of the cost.
 

Matt Rize

Hashmaster
"The cards must be annually renewed and the $100 fee is charged each year, Elliott said. Patients who are eligible for Medi-Cal can have 50% of the fee waived."

Yeah, okay...and with 19 this silly medical card system is no longer needed for those who don't have large medical needs. Are you saying that we should have to pay for a rec to smoke legally?
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
"The cards must be annually renewed and the $100 fee is charged each year, Elliott said. Patients who are eligible for Medi-Cal can have 50% of the fee waived."

Yeah, okay...and with 19 this silly medical card system is no longer needed for those who don't have large medical needs. Are you saying that we should have to pay for a rec to smoke legally?
sure, why not. you're more than willing to be taxed for it, why not just pay a SMALL, once a year fee instead and be done with it? makes A LOT more sense then trying to figure out a whole new set of laws and regulations.

"silly medical card system"
are you serious?
 

The Ruiner

Well-Known Member
Also, not every form of free health coverage is medi-cal....there are so many different kinds on the local levels its ridiculous....and yes, taxes pay for those too.
 

Needofweed

Active Member
Yeah, okay...and with 19 this silly medical card system is no longer needed for those who don't have large medical needs. Are you saying that we should have to pay for a rec to smoke legally?
silly realy,I dont think its silly at all its a very appreciated sistem of laws and rights that must be protected in its entire form.
 

Matt Rize

Hashmaster
sure, why not. you're more than willing to be taxed for it, why not just pay a SMALL, once a year fee instead and be done with it? makes A LOT more sense then trying to figure out a whole new set of laws and regulations.

"silly medical card system"
are you serious?
Hey, no one is overturning 215 here. I'm not convinced that 19 will impede on my 215 rights in any way. If my town decides to tax Cannabis out of existence, then I'm out. There will be Canna-havens here once 19 passes, and places in Cali where Cannabis is hated on.

I think Cannabis should be accepted by the public as a recreational substance, like alcohol, but actually is way safer than alcohol.
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
i don't think you will find 1 person here who doesn't agree that cannabis should be available to the public. there are other ways to do it though.
 

Matt Rize

Hashmaster
i don't think you will find 1 person here who doesn't agree that cannabis should be available to the public. there are other ways to do it though.
That we can agree on. If Jack H 2012 had a remote chance of gaining mainstream acceptance...I'd be on that train. But it's like a stoner's wet dream.

I'm not into taxation or regulation by any means. Just sick of the BS, and I think the world might be fooled into thinking we LEGALIZED IT.

This may not be the best for Cali, but possibly for the world. No one knows really, this is unprecedented legislation in America.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top